Template talk:Convert

Template:Convert

... in conception

... and in reality

Linear feature density

At Transport in Switzerland#Railways I've found a need to convert 122 km/1000 km² into imperial (probably something like miles per 100 or 1000 sqmi). Is this something convert can handled? In the article I've gone with separate conversions to come up with 76 mi per 390 sq mi which is not ideal. Thryduulf (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Best I can find is {{cvt|0.122|km/km2|mi/sqmi|3}} to display as 0.122 km/km² (0.196 mi/sq mi)

In theory we should be able to use e3km2 and e3sqmi but these don't work.  Stepho  talk  17:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Similarly at List of prominent mountains of Switzerland#Distribution there is approximately 1.09 summits per 100 km² that I've just left as I can't work out anything sensible (I don't think 0.0109/km² (0.028/sq mi) is particularly useful). Thryduulf (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Found a really clumsy and dirty technique: {{cvt|122|mi|km0|abbr=values|disp=preunit|km/1000 km<sup>2</sup>|mile/1000 sq mile}} displays as 122 km/1000 km² (196 mile/1000 sq mile)

This relies on km/km2 converting to mi/sqmi being the same ratio as mi to km - ie km/km2 is same as 1/km and 1/km -> 1/mi being the same ratio as mi -> km. Dirty, very dirty.

Sadly, this trick doesn't work for summits per area.  Stepho  talk  17:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

If there were a heap of these, new units for "1000 km2" and "100 sqmi" and "100 km2" could be defined. I'm not sure how clean the result would be but it might be reasonable. Johnuniq (talk) 03:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

A similar issue arises at Scandinavian mountains#Climate, permafrost and glaciers where there is a need to convert "1.17 °C /100 m" but the logical {{convert|1.17|C-change/e2m}} gives an error (1.17 C-change/e2m). A quick search suggests that "°C /100m" (with that exact spacing) is used in at least three other articles. Thryduulf (talk) 11:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Combining multiple components with ranges

Is it possible to combine the "multiple components" form, like {{convert|11|ft|2|in|m}} and {{convert|4|ft|5|in|m}}, with the "range" form? The only way that I've found that works is {{convert|11+2/12|x|4+5/12|ft|m|abbr=on}} - this gives 11+2⁄12 ft × 4+5⁄12 ft (3.4 m × 1.3 m) which is technically correct, but not ideal. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, no. The multiple units like feet/inches can have several components (miles, chains, ...) and making them work with a range was beyond me. However, if desperate, there is a dirty trick which I can't really recommend but which gives a reasonable result in this case:

• {{convert|3.40|x|1.35|m|ftin|order=flip}} → 11 feet 2 inches by 4 feet 5 inches (3.40 m × 1.35 m)
• {{cvt|3.40|x|1.35|m|ftin|order=flip}} → 11 ft 2 in × 4 ft 5 in (3.40 m × 1.35 m)

Johnuniq (talk) 23:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

OK, Thank you --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

A new double conversion

For Reciprocating engine#History {{convert|2,300|metric ton|short ton long ton|lk=on}} and {{convert|2,300|metric ton|ST LT|lk=on}} 2,300 metric tons () and 2,300 metric tons (2,535 short tons; 2,264 long tons) instead of {{convert|2,300|metric ton|short ton|lk=on}} or {{convert|2,300|metric ton|long ton|lk=on|sigfig=4}} 2,300 metric tons (2,535 short tons) or 2,300 metric tons (2,264 long tons) Peter Horn User talk 01:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

@Peter Horn: When a unit code such as short ton contains a space, use + to separate units:

• {{convert|2,300|metric ton|short ton+long ton|lk=on}} → 2,300 metric tons (2,500 short tons; 2,300 long tons)

Johnuniq (talk) 02:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 02:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Peter Horn User talk 02:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Possible bug report re: temperature units

Input:

{{Convert|1|K|C F|abbr=~}}
{{Convert|1|C|F|abbr=~}}
{{Convert|1|C|F|abbr=off}}
{{Convert|1|K|C F|abbr=off}}
{{Convert|1|Celsius|F|abbr=~}}
{{Convert|1|Fahrenheit|Celsius}}
{{Convert|1|C|kelvin|abbr=~}}

Output:
1 K [K] (−272.15 °C; −457.87 °F)
1 °C [°C] (34 °F)
1 degree Celsius (34 degrees Fahrenheit)
1 kelvin (−272.15 degrees Celsius; −457.87 degrees Fahrenheit)
1 °C [°C] (34 °F)
1 Fahrenheit
1 °C [°C] ()

Semi-expected output:
1: 1 kelvin [K]
2: 1 degree Celsius [°C]
3 & 4: N/A, working
5: 1 degree Celsius [°C]

And last 2, certainly slightly surprising behavior that it outputs the unit names but doesn't recognize some as input. But it does for Celsius. If that's known/intended behavior, ought to be documented somewhere. (There, then it's not a bug, b/c you documented it—now it's a feature )

Contrasted:
1 inch [in] (0.083 ft; 2.5 cm)
1 inch (2.5 cm)
1 kilometre (5.0 furlongs)
Slowking Man (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Convert has a lot of quirks due to its long history. The proper documentation is at Module:Convert/documentation/conversion data#Temperature. Various summaries of the units are available but I don't like the advice they give for temperature because they suggest that {{convert|30|°C}} is the approved method whereas it should actually be {{convert|30|C}} on the basis that unit codes are intended to be easy to type and it is not necessary to remember that it is K (kelvin) but °C (degrees Celsius). At any rate, for obscure historical reasons, Celsius was defined as an alias for C but the other names were not defined. If anything, I would recommend removing Celsius. Johnuniq (talk) 01:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

I started wondering if the OP was more concerned about the fact that abbr=~ produces °C [°C]. That option is rarely used. Most units default to showing the name for the input (for example, 30 kilograms). Using abbr=~ would display 30 kilograms [kg]). That is, it shows the symbol as well as the name. It turns out that temperature units default to showing the symbol and you have to use abbr=off to make them show the name. That means you cannot also use abbr=~ so it is not possible to show the name and symbol for a temperature unit. That is not ideal but probably is not worth fixing. See Template talk:Convert/Archive December 2014#What happened with abbr=~ ? for a discussion of whether the option should be deprecated. Johnuniq (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

WMF needs to determine your IRL identity and insure your life for $10,000,000 -- the conservative cost of hiring a staff of coders to take over maintenance of convert, should the worst happen. EEng 03:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

I would take you up on that great idea if it were not for my nervousness regarding giving someone a $10,000,000 reason for me to disappear! Johnuniq (talk) 03:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

With the right paperwork, a "reported" death and a new life in Cuba, you could have a rather nice retirement plan :)

On an unrelated note, I'd completely forgotten that I had commented on this 10 years ago. But having never used it even once, I'm in favour of removing it. Is it used much?

Sounds like the OP's gripe is that Fahrenheit and kelvin are valid outputs but not valid inputs. Considering we also have meters, miles, feet, inches, etc as inputs, I tend to agree with him.  Stepho  talk  07:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Gotta watch out for that template mafia. Extremely groan-worthy memeing attempt:

{{that's|how={{{mafia|{{{works}}}}}}}}

(for those not getting it) --Slowking Man (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Hah, not surprising (I've seen scarier corner cases in old code for sure). Wanted to be helpful mainly and ensure this was known. Certainly understand if people aren't rushing in to overhaul the template code. Would be good to document the behavior somewhere I think. Where do people think is the best place to put that? Wouldn't mind writing up a note in the docs. Thanks for the expert knowledge! --Slowking Man (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Ranges of ranges of values

In technical plant descriptions (e.g. floras), dimensions of plant parts are often given in ranges of ranges: "5-15 x 4-8 mm". Is there a way to get {{convert}} to handle that appropriately, i.e. "5-15 x 4-8 mm (0.2-0.6 x 0.2-0.3 in)"? At the moment, {{convert|5|–|15|×|4|-|8|mm|1|abbr=on}} gives "5 mm–15 mm × 4 mm–8 mm (0.2 in–0.6 in × 0.2 in–0.3 in)", which is far too repetitive for readability.

{{convert|5|–|15|mm|1|abbr=on}} x {{convert|4|–|8|mm|1|abbr=on}} is a little better, giving "5–15 mm (0.2–0.6 in) x 4–8 mm (0.2–0.3 in)", but that's still needlessly repetitive. {{convert|5|–|4|mm|1|abbr=on}} x {{convert|15|–|8|mm|1|abbr=on}} gives "5–4 mm (0.2–0.2 in) x 15–8 mm (0.6–0.3 in)", which is also still repetitive, and also incorrectly formatted.

Any advice?

-- Photosynthetic430 ❧ 15:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

According to the documentation, |x| and |abbr=on| combine to output the unit symbol multiple times, as per MOS:UNITSYMBOLS. Replace |x| with |xx| so that {{convert|5|–|15|xx|4|-|8|mm|1|abbr=on}} outputs 5–15 × 4–8 mm (0.2–0.6 × 0.2–0.3 in). Downside is that xx is deprecated and you will be violating MOS:UNITSYMBOLS. Perhaps you should raise the question of whether this format should be used at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers.  Stepho  talk  15:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

There must be some way in which{{convert|5|–|15|×|4|-|8|mm|1|abbr=values|disp=preunit|mm|in}} giving "5–15 × 4–8 mm (0.2–0.6 × 0.2–0.3 in)" is risky but I haven't figured that out yet. NebY (talk) 16:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Ah - anyone using it for anything but mm would have to take care to change both "mm" - otherwise e.g. changing only the first mm to m as {{convert|5|–|15|×|4|-|8|m|1|abbr=values|disp=preunit|mm|in}} gives "5–15 × 4–8 mm (16.4–49.2 × 13.1–26.2 in)". NebY (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Discussions here about MOS:UNITNAMES resulted in the situation shown above where unit symbols are duplicated. There was a fair bit of pressure to remove a workaround which I retained on the principle that a template should not prevent an editor from exercising judgment. The trick is to use xx instead of x.

• {{convert|5|-|15|x|4|-|8|mm|1|abbr=on}} → 5 mm–15 mm × 4 mm–8 mm (0.2 in–0.6 in × 0.2 in–0.3 in)
• {{convert|5|-|15|xx|4|-|8|mm|1|abbr=on}} → 5–15 × 4–8 mm (0.2–0.6 × 0.2–0.3 in)

Note that it is better to use a letter x and a hyphen - in the input because they are easier to type and easier for others to copy. Johnuniq (talk) 22:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! That's exactly what I needed. -- Photosynthetic430 ❧ 08:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Pint, half pint, one-third [of an] imperial pint

In Beer festival, are instances of pints related to the United Kingdom units of measurement (imperial pints) or just a type of beer glass?-- Carnby (talk) 17:05, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

@Carnby: Why are you asking here, and not at Talk:Beer festival? This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Template:Convert. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

@Redrose64: My apologies, just a mistake. But there are some problems involving {{convert}} as well:

• there is an instance of the measuring unit "half pint" that I need to convert into litres and US pints;
• using {{convert|1/3|imppt|L USpt|1|spell=in|disp=sqbr}} yields one-third imperial pint instead one-third of an imperial pint;
• there is an instance of "tubs of cider and perry"; a tub should be about four gallons, according to the Merriam-Webster.

--Carnby (talk) 19:38, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Tub (unit) lists different weights for butter/cheese (84 lb), tea (60 lb), camphire (56-86 lb), vermillion (336-448 lb), camphor (130 Dutch lb), coal (100 lb), salt (18 imperial gallons).  Stepho  talk  20:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

But for cider and perry?-- Carnby (talk) 21:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

You don't have to use Convert. If it doesn't produce the English phrasing you want, you can obtain and insert the value into your phrasing in any way you want. If you'd rather use Convert than a calculator, perhaps to give other editors confidence, you can use it to give only the output value(s) and unit(s) (or even only a value), e.g. one-third of an imperial pint ({{convert|1/3|imppt|L USpt|1|disp=out}}) -> one-third of an imperial pint (0.2 L; 0.4 US pt). More such options are available at Template:Convert/doc#Displaying parts of the result: 2 (1.5). NebY (talk) 21:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

More readable fractions

Using the fraction function such as 7 centimetres (2+3⁄4 in) with some browsers results in hard-to-read small font for the integer of the conversion as well as the fraction numerals. (The only difference is a different vertical position between the integer and numerator. The input value shows correctly in regular font.) Is there a work around to make it more browser-agnostic? Or at least to add whitespace between the integer & the fraction to make the result more readable? 71.230.16.111 (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Here is a comparison with {{frac}}:

• {{convert|7|cm|frac=8|disp=number}} → 2+3⁄4
• {{frac|2|3|4}} → 2+3⁄4

Using Special:ExpandTemplates shows the outputs are identical (except that {{frac}} has a self-closing templatestyles). The place to discuss this might be Template talk:Fraction or WP:VPT. Johnuniq (talk) 07:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I'll take it to template talk:fraction. The obvious solution is to insert a narrow non-breaking space. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks but for posterity I will mention that the identical output from convert and fraction consists of some magic span tags that separate the numbers (2, 3, 4 in the above fractions). The action takes place in Template:Fraction/styles.css. Johnuniq (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Plans for new version

I am slowly planning a new version of the module. This is mainly a result of a discussion at the Ukrainian Wikipedia regarding a bug in the way variable names are handled. Languages such as Ukrainian have more than one plural form for a unit name. Some examples are at uk:User:Johnuniq/convert with discussion at its talk.

I also want to clean up some minor issues:

• Units mile and miles will set abbr=off for that unit. That means {{convert|4|km|miles}} would display "4 kilometres (2.5 miles)" rather than the current "4 kilometres (2.5 mi)". This was mentioned in June 2021.
• Think about whether any other aliases should similarly set abbr=off. I would probably leave that for another time as it is only mile/miles that I have noticed being a problem with a result of "mi" when the editor went to the trouble of typing "miles".
• Want a fix for {{convert|10|e6kg|e6lb|abbr=unit}} so result can be "10 million kg (22 million pounds)" rather than the current "10 million kg (22 million lb)".
• Perhaps add an alias for abbr=~ (maybe adj=~?) to avoid the problem mentioned above. That would allow {{convert|1|C|K|abbr=off|adj=~}} to display "1 degree Celsius [°C] (274 kelvins)".

The abbr=unit issue has been raised several times. The problem is that abbr=off results in "million kilograms" while abbr=on gives the unappealing "10×10^⁶ kg". Using abbr=unit means the units will be abbreviated (kg and lb) while million will not.

I haven't been able to think of a clean way to specify that million should be spelled but I am currently wondering whether this trick would be ok:

• e6lb would work as it does now (million or engineering notation depending on abbr).
• E6lb would give million (never engineering notation).

Thoughts? Any clean alternative syntax? Johnuniq (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Module version 30

Some changes to the convert modules are in the sandbox and I intend switching the main modules to use the sandbox soon.

• Module:Convert • Module:Convert/sandbox • different (diff)
• Module:Convert/data • Module:Convert/data/sandbox • different (diff)
• Module:Convert/text • Module:Convert/text/sandbox • different (diff)
• Module:Convert/extra • Module:Convert/extra/sandbox • same content
• Module:Convert/wikidata • Module:Convert/wikidata/sandbox • same content
• Module:Convert/wikidata/data • Module:Convert/wikidata/data/sandbox • same content
• Option adj=~ is an alias for abbr=~ so either may be used to display the input name and symbol.
  • {{convert|1|C|K|abbr=off|adj=~}} → 1 degree Celsius [°C] (274 kelvins)
• Option link=... is an alias for lk=... so either may be used to control whether units are linked.
  • {{convert|12.3|kn|link=in}} → 12.3 knots (22.8 km/h; 14.2 mph)
• Units can be entered with an engineering factor using "e" or "E", for example, e3km or E3km. Using uppercase E3km displays the factor as a word ("thousand") rather than as ×10³. Using lowercase e3km continues to display the word if abbr=unit is used, or if abbr=off applies to the unit.
  • {{convert|10|e3mi|e3km}} → 10 thousand miles (16×10^³ km)
  • {{convert|10|e3mi|E3km}} → 10 thousand miles (16 thousand km)
  • {{convert|10|E6kg|E6lb|abbr=in}} → 10 million kg (22 million pounds)
• For ukwiki (and others), function variable_name has been enhanced to use mw.language.getContentLanguage():convertPlural rather than the inadequate home-grown code that was developed for slwiki in 2014. In addition a bug fix to prevent duplication of the local language's equivalent of "kilo" was implemented. See uk:User:Johnuniq/convert and its talk.
• For ukwiki, a unit can have a pername that will be used if the unit is the second in a "per". For example, the definition for mi can include the names that it normally has, as well as a pername that would be used in a per unit such as $/mi.
• For ukwiki, the eng_scales table in Module:Convert/text has been enhanced to allow variable names for factors such as "kilo" that depend on the value.
• Units mile and miles set abbr=off.
  • {{convert|4|km|mi}} → 4 kilometres (2.5 mi)
  • {{convert|4|km|miles}} → 4 kilometres (2.5 miles)
• Module:Convert/makeunits
  • The definition for an alias accepts abbr=off to force use of the unit name, not symbol.
  • Unit definitions can include a pername.

The above examples use fixed wikitext so the outputs won't change in the future.

For posterity, I will record that Module:Convert/extra has had unit bit since August 2022. It also had byte but I removed it as it was unused and had a small error, and was not supported in October 2020 or in April 2023. Unit bit has a good use in Patterned media so I intend to keep it. Normally, I would move extra units to the main data module but there would have to be another unit (byte) to be the default output for bit. Therefore, I'm just leaving bit as an extra unit for consideration another time.

There is a little more information at #Plans for new version above. Johnuniq (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)