Talk:Gyanmati
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gyanmati article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 27 August 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Gyanmati Mataji → Gyanmati – honorific-suffix should not be there on wikipedia title -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This is covered at MOS:BIO; the honorific being non-English doesn't exempt it from that guideline. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment
[edit]Note that she is invariable referred to as "Gyanmati Mataji". No one ever calls her Gyanmati. Shastri (an academic degree) in Lal Bahadur Shastri, Mahatma in Mahatma Gandhi, Pope in Pope Paul VI are all honorific. However until there is someone else famous with the name Gyanmati, I wouldn't mind reserving the article title "Gyanmati" for her. She is a very well known personality.Malaiya (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC).
Issues
[edit]The article needs total rewrite. The notability of person should also be assessed. Please check for references.--Nizil (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- It is true that the language of the article needs some work. However I could not see anything obviously questionable or incorrect in the article. Can you comment in some detail? Thanks.Malaiya (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Malaiya, there are three tags which should be considered. Article is not according to WP:MOS. It should be divided in Early life/Monastic career/Literary career/Construction activities etc. Achievements is something different. References are poorly formatted/unclear. Sentences such as
Reading and reviewing the same developed a strong desire to further share study and spread the noble concept of Ahimsa (Non Violence) as described in Jainism.
andAt the tender age of 18 exactly on auspicious day of Sharad Purnima 1952, she decided to dedicate herself in preaching and practicing this religiously and vowed of lifelong Celibacy following the Seven Pratimas as Brahmacharini under the guidance of Acharya Deshbhushan ji Maharaj.
violate WP:MOSWTW and WP:NCIN. In Infobox, honorifics are used. The language is flowery and puffed. There are several unclear words and confusing sentences like what isfollowing the Seven Pratimas as Brahmacharini
. So I have requested complete rewrite. -Nizil (talk) 04:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)- I have rewritten lede and Early life section to illustrate how it should have been written. Watch for grammar, honorifics, capitals etc too.-Nizil (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have done further cleanup and have added some tags.-Nizil (talk) 05:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have rewritten lede and Early life section to illustrate how it should have been written. Watch for grammar, honorifics, capitals etc too.-Nizil (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Malaiya, there are three tags which should be considered. Article is not according to WP:MOS. It should be divided in Early life/Monastic career/Literary career/Construction activities etc. Achievements is something different. References are poorly formatted/unclear. Sentences such as
- It is true that the language of the article needs some work. However I could not see anything obviously questionable or incorrect in the article. Can you comment in some detail? Thanks.Malaiya (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)