Talk:LGBTQ culture in Singapore
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGBTQ culture in Singapore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about LGBTQ culture in Singapore. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about LGBTQ culture in Singapore at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
September 2007
[edit]"On 26 December 2005, China Daily reported that Zhang Beichuan, China's foremost expert on homosexuality estimated, according to statistics, that the number of gays in the Peoples' Republic was between 39 and 52 million, or 3 to 4 percent of the population.[3]
Figures in Singapore may be broadly similar." -Citation needed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.74.187.52 (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- The section "Gay backlash" should be transferred to the article "Singapore gay history".Groyn88 (talk) 08:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- 3 to 4 % sounds very low, statistics are not a particularly reliable method for measuring such things because most people tend not to be very honest. A more accurate figure /estimate for humanity across all races and creeds is that it varies between 0% and 30% to 50% gay naturally. Today most (ie all) people are exposed to heavy cultural and social imprinting and other factors that make any attempt at direct analysis very difficult. (It is speculation and O.R. but genetic/evolutionary analysis suggests that in overpopulated societies like China, Singapore, or the UK, etc that we should expect the number of gays to rise to as much as 90%). Lucien86 (talk) 03:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Singapore public gay parties for deletion
[edit]A discussion has begun about whether the article Singapore public gay parties, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore public gay parties (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Andy Dingley (talk) 12:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Contribution to Singapore Gay Community: Fastr - Gay Social Networking SG App
[edit]Fastr gay social networking mobile app is the leading Singapore gay app that contributes to the gay community of Singapore. Search "fastr gay" in App Store or Google Play to check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xboyhunk (talk • contribs) 05:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT culture in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080713044107/http://www.todayonline.com/articles/264684.asp to http://www.todayonline.com/articles/264684.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071120103008/http://www.sgwiki.com/wiki/Singapore_sexual_slang to http://www.sgwiki.com/wiki/Singapore_sexual_slang
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT culture in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111093439/http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/Science+and+Tech/Story/A1Story20130318-409443.html to http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/Science+and+Tech/Story/A1Story20130318-409443.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050405224059/http://www.yawningbread.org/index2.htm to http://www.yawningbread.org/index2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)