Jump to content

Talk:Mixer (appliance)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Mixer (cooking))

Untitled

[edit]

what simple machines go into the mixer? whisks go in the machine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.138.231 (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam?

[edit]

Is there any reason the KitchenAid and Sunbeam MixMaster are singled out for separate mention in the article, except promotion of those companies' products? Unless someone comes up with some sourced notability, I'm going to delete these slimy little attempts at viral marketing. --ChetvornoTALK 00:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --ChetvornoTALK 14:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

whipping disambiguation

[edit]

Egg Beater should better redirect to kitchen-robot and not to "mixer (cooking)". Țhe mixer is a handheld appliance in the kitchen not a (cooking) while a kitchen robot includes a plastic container which it uses to whip sweet-cream, beat eggs, and homogenise different pastry dows, using flower salt baking powder water eggs maybe vanilla and sygar, kitchen ingredients. what is the diffrences between a consumer Kenwood KM070 and the mixers? 188.25.51.47 (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

in excess of 100 quarts

[edit]

The article says that "Heavy duty commercial models can have bowl capacities well in excess of 100 quarts (95 liters)". This is formally correct (100 quarts is between 94 and 95 liters), but sounds strange. Isn't "well in excess of 100 quarts" more than 100 liters? --194.166.241.102 (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made another minor edit here, as using 'quarts' to refer to a volume larger than a gallon makes no sense. Colostomyexplosion (talk) 07:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mixers or hand mixers

[edit]

If this is an already decent length article about mixers in general, why was it re-titled and the lead changed to be about hand mixers? I see this was done by User:Störm in January and February.

If there doesn't turn out to be a particulary good reason to for these changes, I'm going to revert them. If hand mixers are notable enough as a subsection of mixers, then certainly a separate article could be created for them and linked to from this article with the Main template. But currently the article is about mixers in general, and the title and lead should reflect that. --Veikk0.ma 22:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Veikk0.ma done. Störm (talk) 06:58, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Stirrer (cooking)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Stirrer (cooking) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#Stirrer (cooking) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should we spinoff egg beater?

[edit]

This article has a mention of the handheld egg beater. I'd be quite interested in spinning this off as it has an interesting history. Mixers and egg beaters are quite different so I'm wondering what you think. —Panamitsu (talk) 11:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Epsa goyal

[edit]

Real name of ancient mixer 113.199.230.41 (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]