Jump to content

Talk:Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (2022–present)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overall source

[edit]

I bumped into that source but cannot integrate it a the moment.

Another merge proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine into this article for context and lack of independent notability; this had more support than the alternative proposal of a merge with 29 December 2023 Russian strikes on Ukraine. Klbrain (talk) 06:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand keeping the 29 December article as it was the biggest such attack so far in the war and it also caused a political crisis. But why do we now also have an article for 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine? We are almost two years into the war and over one year into these kinds of attacks and I see no reason now to start suddenly giving each attack its own individual article. The 2 January one did not break any records and its article is pretty short. We can easily merge it into Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (2022–present)#January 2024. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would keep page 29 December 2023 Russian strikes on Ukraine for the time being, but merge 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine somewhere, possibly even to page 29 December 2023 Russian strikes on Ukraine which then should be renamed to something like "Happy New Year strikes" [1]. It seems they are going to conduct such strikes every week (a few days are needed to prepare the next strike). My very best wishes (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be okay with that outcome. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 17:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for continuing the discussion @Super Dromaeosaurus, @My very best wishes. i think there should be separate articles for such large attacks. at least a few things should be considered: if more people had been injured, we might not be having this discussion. 2 years into the full-scale invasion, it's very possible the number of human victims of airstrikes by russia in ukraine has decreased dramatically due to military aid that has much improved ukrainian air defense since february 22nd, 2022. also there have been plenty of articles on smaller single location airstrikes, so i recommend that we continue with separate articles on airstrikes of much larger magnitude.
more generally it seems there are a few different article scopes in time and space documenting airstrikes during the Russo-Ukrainian War:
on the 2nd of january, 2024 there were around 99 missiles and 35 drones fielded by russia, and fortunately a relatively low number of people victimized because of better air defense. so i suggest we have articles for such large attacks. ~ Johnfreez (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 2 January 2024 attack does not have any distinctive feature separating it from the other dozens of attack waves that Russia has launched since October 2022, unlike the 29 December 2023 one. Its article remains short. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree with @Super Dromaeosaurus that, while the 29 December one makes sense, the 2 January article should probably be folded into the parent article. Arcendeight (talk) 23:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 17:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
support- I agree with main reason to merge. Wendylove (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  checkY Merger complete.

26 August 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine

[edit]

This article should be merged here as a paragraph would cover in prose the strikes that took place. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Second para of lead needs rewrite I think

[edit]

I think it is too detailed for the lead Chidgk1 (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can copy from this

[edit]

https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/cec49dc2-7d04-442f-92aa-54c18e6f51d6/UkrainesEnergySecurityandtheComingWinter.pdf I see at end is CC BY 4.0 Chidgk1 (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]