Talk:Qlik

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Qlik article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

This is a real company with thousands of customers. It is really growing as fast as the articles explain and should be added to Wikipedia. Any company that has been listed as Technology Pioneer of the Year for 2008 should be listed here. Let me know how I can make this post stick so that others may learn about QlikTech.

The article sounds like an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. It should be written from a neutral point of view (i.e., not by the company or an employee thereof). Player 03 (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, seconded. I've added a NPOV to it. "....enables organizations to make better and faster decisions....ability to provide users with detailed data analysis with a single click", etc. Sounds like the QlikView is writing its resume.Walker222 (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd originally nominated this for deletion, but upon further searching, I'm not convinced the company isn't notable. I am, however, convinced that the enormous "Awards" section at the end is spammy and self-promoting, so I've removed it in an effort to make the article more encyclopedic.evildeathmath 21:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to QlikTech International

I suggest that this article be moved to QlikTech International, the company's full name. Does anyone have any comments on the proposed move? --Eastmain (talk) 02:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to be written in advertisement literature and contains personal judgments about some companies instead of facts and figures —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.127.26.170 (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Qlik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

missing data point

the article doesn't say when has the company moved from Sweden to the US. צחי (talk) 11:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing out non-RSes in a few days

This article's been a sea of primary sources for a long while. I'll be clearing out everything cited only to a non-WP:RS in a few days - David Gerard (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page cleanup

Hi everyone, I just started what I consider a clean-up, namely trying to add more neutral references, etc. Please help me to brainstorm what has to be done before the templates for verification can be removed. The following is on my to-do list:

Summarize what https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2016/08/31/qlik-stock-withdrawn-as-thoma-bravo-completes-acquisition/#7d51c82aa4f8 is about.
Summarize and cite https://www.heise.de/ix/meldung/Business-Intelligence-Qlik-zeigt-neue-Software-fuer-Entwickler-4026480.html
Elaborate on the difference between QlikView and QlikSense given my discussion with the Qlik hotline.
Inquire about when the company moved to US.
Figure out, what is known in the Swedish web about the company.

Hou710 (talk) 09:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Proposed information to be added to make the article more robust: 1) Information about Qlik's acquisition of Podium Data ^[1]; ^[2] 2) Details on the history of Qlik ^[3] 3) Updated product range with Idevio GeoAnalytics and Podium Data acquisitions ^[4] 4) Company's work around data literacy ^[5] 5) Qlik industry recognition ^[6]; ^[7] Wooly2727 (talk) 07:58, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Reply 11-DEC-2018

Clarification needed

It is not known how the changes you are requesting to be made are to be worded in the final implemented version. Please specify all requested changes verbatim in the form of "Change x to y using z".

Change x to y using z
x	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
y	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
z	A reference which verifies the requested change

Example edit request:

Please change:

The Sun's diameter is 25 miles. (This is x)

to read as:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles. (This is y)

using as a reference:

Sjöblad, Tristan (2018). The Sun. Academic Press. p. 1. (This is z)

When ready to proceed, please alter the {{request edit}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes to |ans=no.
Regards, Spintendo 09:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up mass reversion

Hi @MrOllie:, I appreciate your edits on the page and your vigilance on Wikipedia. I understand some of the content was poorly sourced or too bussiness related. I'd like to add a small amount of the existing edits back in that were associated with sources that meet WP:RS. I will also tone down any promotional language in my revision. Here are some of the sources I'm talking about:

https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-us-co-qlik-buys-attunity-in-560m-cash-deal-1001274304 (Israel Business News)

https://www.computerworlduk.com/data/qlik-launches-industrys-only-end-end-data-platform-3696832/

https://www.zdnet.com/article/qlik-acquires-podium-data-as-bi-and-big-data-coalesce/ (Author is expert in the field)

Snappytimez (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All three of them look like thinly rewritten press releases to me. - MrOllie (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nasdaq

This article is included in the Companies formerly listed on the Nasdaq category. However, there is no mention of Nasdaq in the article. This Nasdaq press release is the announcement that Nasdaq: QLIK would start trading on July 16, 2010. It appears that QLIK traded up to 2016.

This June 2016 web article about The Rise and Fall of Qlik mentions that QLIK had agreed to be acquired by the private equity firm Thoma Bravo. I'm guessing that caused QLIK to be removed from Nasdaq though don't know the exact date that happened.

Overall, the company trading on Nasdaq for six years seems significant enough that it should be mentioned in the article. --Marc Kupper|talk 06:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://searchbusinessanalytics.techtarget.com/news/252445579/Qlik-Podium-acquisition-aims-to-boost-BI-data-management

[2] ttps://digitizingpolaris.com/heres-why-qlik-bought-podium-data-87797412e872

[3] ttps://oresundstartups.com/success-stories-might-missed-qlik/

[4] ttps://siliconangle.com/2017/01/04/qlik-buys-location-data-firm-idevio-bolster-geospatial-capabilities/

[5] ttps://insidebigdata.com/2018/10/15/new-research-uncovers-500-million-enterprise-value-opportunity-data-literacy/

[6] ttps://searchbusinessanalytics.techtarget.com/feature/Mike-Capone-Qlik-CEO-says-roadmap-targets-cloud-big-data

[7] ttps://www.datanami.com/2017/09/15/forrester-reshuffles-deck-bi-analytics-tools/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]