User talk:DangalOh

Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, DangalOh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Kolkata rape case

Hey, I saw that you reincluded few sections about the accusations. Please note that wikipedia is not a news article. Also, try to include the rebuttal by the government and the make sure that the section is not one sided. VSankeerthSai1609 (talk) 17:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Replied in your talk page DangalOh (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from naming users on the edit summaries. VSankeerthSai1609 (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

ok. Wont do tht again DangalOh (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Cool🤝 VSankeerthSai1609 (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

There is no Wikipedia guideline stating you to refrain from mentioning users in edit summaries. @VSankeerthSai1609, Please note that, as I have explained in my talk page. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

@The Herald OK, noted VSankeerthSai1609 (talk) 01:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Advice

Please take care not to make comments that could be construed as racist or sectarian. Even if that is not your intention any such comments can only cause you trouble that you can better do without. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Never delete someone's reply to you. If I wanted to live a trouble-free life, I wouldn't be involved in topics like these where I know I don't have enough support for my point of view. DangalOh (talk) 21:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Genesis

Oh la la, you're following me diff? Do I have a fanbase? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Ha Ha. I would say our interests are pretty aligned, and yes, if I had to choose any senior editor to follow, it would definitely be you. It’s extremely difficult to find people with the interests we share in today’s world. I always strive to maintain a proper balance and be fair to every human, regardless of their religious or political views, and I'm not afraid to share mine. I might have some biases towards certain cultures based on my understanding of their philosophies or scriptures, but I am always open to learning something new, adapting, and changing my worldview. I believe one should always be a seeker, never a blind believer. I like how you are bold in expressing both your critical and traditional views. I believe you can be reasoned with, which is why, even when I feel there might be a minor issue with your editing, I don’t hesitate to tell you, as I did earlier. But don’t worry, I have many other interests that might not overlap with yours, so I won’t be following you all the time :P. But yes, in this case, my blood boiled because I hate it when people disregard scholarship based on religion and have absolute disregard for philosophy, so I thought I’d give my two cents there. Hope you have a good time editing! DangalOh (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)