Jump to content

User talk:Speculoos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:David Descamps)

Brussels-Capital Region

[edit]

Hi David, I reverted your names-changing cf. [1]: besides art. 3, there are also art. 134, 138 etc; both names are quite official and in the constitution, the region itself seems to prefer the long names. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 31 Dec2006 20:15 (UTC)

Allright. Thanx David Descamps 20:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move regarding municipalities in the Walloon Region

[edit]

David, would you have a look at my response to your request. May I ask to please reinstate 'municipality' everywhere you had put 'commune' in place, for the reason explained there. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 1 Jan2007 00:25 (UTC)

WikiProject France

[edit]

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Frans Willems

[edit]

Hi, there seems to be a misunderstanding of the word "costitution" in the article of Jan Frans Willems. I think it should be changed to "foundation" as it refers to the foundation of the United Kingdom of the Nenterlands, not to its constitution. It is probably a "Dutchism" and unclear to readers? Pvosta 10:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oprichting and not grondwet, is that what you meant? David Descamps 19:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, so "foundation" might be the right word. Pvosta 06:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

[edit]

I noticed a pair of small typos on your personal page. I lives in Tournai, a flemish town in Belgium located in the Walloon Region should be:

I live in Tournai, a Flemish town in Belgium located in the Walloon Region.

Regards,

Funnyhat 02:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thx David Descamps 09:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Care to take a look at the latest developments? Bradipus (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fr:Histoire du terme Wallon

[edit]

Hi, I'll have a look at that; at least seeing how the Wallonia articles are organised on the French Wikipedia would be a good idea. I don't mean any offence by questioning the articles. I don't know Stephane.dohet or have an opinion on Wallonia or Belgian politics. I'm simply a neutral editor who's trying to ensure articles/disambiguation etc. is organised so as to be most useful to a read who knows nothing about the topic. I'm quite willing to discuss and help improve the articles so that they are useful to the layman. Regards, JRawle (Talk) 15:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN

[edit]

Hi Speculoos,
Take care that here such complains : [2] are not politically correct and per WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA, they are not usually welcome.
By the way, if you have real problems (but not content issues, only behavioural issues), you should complain on WP:AN/I and not on WP:AN.
Hope user:Fram can help.
Regards, Ceedjee (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment. On wp:en, the policy is to warn an editor when you complain about him, whether on WP:AN or WP:AN/I. Your motivations could be badly perceived if you would not take care of this...
Ceedjee (talk) 20:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome.
FYI, on wp:en, the interaction between contributors is quite different than the one on wp:fr.
Here, animosity and even light personal attacks are more badly perceived than on wp:fr.
In case of trouble, admins will only take behaviour into account and completely do not mind who is right or not, and who is pov-pushing or not, but contributors are expected, far more than on wp:fr, to be wp:civil with this famous British flegmatism...
When the other side gets upset, contributors are also expected to take distance and to leave the other side cool down before to go on the discussion.
Take care, Ceedjee (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Informative template

[edit]

Template:Informative template has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Speculoos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Belgium Municipality/Economy

[edit]

Template:Infobox Belgium Municipality/Economy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Speculoos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BelgianMunicipality eco

[edit]

Template:BelgianMunicipality eco has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BelgianMunicipality pop

[edit]

Template:BelgianMunicipality pop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]