User talk:Rajatheexplorer

Welcome

Hello, Gopatholabs, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 11:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Possible username issue

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Gopatholabs", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate user name

According to our Username policy, user names should not be promotional (Wikipedia:Username policy#Promotional names), which means the username should be assigned to a single person, and not name or indicate a company or society.

Your declaration 'We are a couple of people' directly contradicts the policy which may cause the block of the account. I strongly recommend you to avoid using a collective account. Additionally you can ask for opinion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names, and/or start a change name procedure (see Wikipedia:Username policy#Changing your username). Remember, however, to assign one person to an account.

Additionally, if the person wants to represent a company etc., they should make an explicit disclosure of their COI (Conflict of Interest) — please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for general guidance and the Declaring an interest section there for declaring CoI. --CiaPan (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot everyone for guiding me and giving a valuable information..

Spam by you

Please quit spamming articles with your garbage! --Hyperforin (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajatheexplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi.I am new to wikipedia editing.I hadn't properly read the terms.Please unblock the account.From now on wards i will follow proper guidelines.Also i want to create another account from rajaranjans@gmail.com .Because the name gopatholabs violate the terms of wiki as it is a name of a brand and commercial.

Decline reason:

Firstly, you need to change your username to a name that is unconnected to any organisation or product, so for your next unblock request you should use the text:
{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}

Secondly, I am unconvinced that you should be editing articles where you have a significant conflict of interest. PhilKnight (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock-spamun|rajatheexplorer|Hi.I am new to wikipedia editing.I hadn't properly read the terms.Please unblock the account.From now on wards i will follow proper guidelines.Also i want to create another account from rajaranjans@gmail.com .Because the name gopatholabs violate the terms of wiki as it is a name of a brand and commercial}}

I've renamed your account. To get unblocked follow the 2 steps below:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

PhilKnight (talk) 23:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See.You can see from my account it is only 2 days old.I have told so many times i did it by mistake.And also i am from INDIA.I am going to write about indian archeology(Very OLD),medical related stuff and mathematics..

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rajatheexplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nobody is responding.I told you so many times it occurred by mistake due to ignorance on the policy.Now onward nothing will happen like this.Please help me.

Accept reason:

I'm unblocking your account. In future take care over promotional edits. PhilKnight (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Stop using your company's blog as a reference. This was already pointed out to you before. References do not have to be online to be valid, and your company's blog may not be a WP:RS, so replacing a medical journal cite with your company's webpage is not a good idea. Meters (talk) 07:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ya ,you are telling it perfect.but the thing is i found it invalid link .If you go through the link you will find the link is not there and also the journal doesn't have valid information.According to Wikipedia policy only (For best content),i gave this article as a link.You can verify with whoever you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajatheexplorer (talk • contribs) 07:11, July 25, 2016‎

I don't understand your comment. The original link still points to the journal abstract page. You are replacing it with a link to your company's webpage, which another editor has already told you is not acceptable. If you think the information in the article is incorrect then discuss it on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]