User talk:Kencf0618
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit]ICHTHUS |
January 2012 |
In this issue...
- From the Editor
- What are You doing For Lent?
- Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
- Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Ways to improve Kalyn Heffernan
[edit]Hi, I'm DCI2026. Kencf0618, thanks for creating Kalyn Heffernan!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. A slightly more encyclopedic (or a tad dryer) tone might be appropriate for the article. Notability could be further ascertained through the inclusion of more sourced content on the page; however, current references should suffice.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Cryptocurrency/blockchain standard notice
[edit]Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome Kencf0618! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Campaign Sidekick
[edit]Hi!
I am genuinely surprised at your creation of the article Campaign Sidekick, as you look like a pretty experienced editor. Sources like Vimeo and InfluenceWatch are not considered reliable, and the tone of the article appeared excessively negative, even assuming the product was mostly negatively criticized.
I see that you removed the maintenance templates, although I'm assuming that was an accident due to an edit conflict? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- The maintenance template removal was inadvertent –sorry! The Vimeo and InfluenceWatch citations came from The Guardian and can be yeeted. As for the tone, it is notable that the Trump ground game in Pennsylvania has had to fall back on manual entry & "walk books" (which is why The Guardian is covering the logistics of canvassing here); I'm sure its successful use bears some mention. kencf0618 (talk) 00:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug