Jump to content

User talk:MShefa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Keyfilmation)

A tag has been placed on Adalantis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sigma 7 03:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2825237-1-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Calvin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 07:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

[edit]

Hello, you are welcome to contribute constructively in Afghanistan-related articles. However, I noticed that you kept inserting the Nastaliq tag in the names of cities written in Persian script. I think it is completely useless to insert the Nastaliq tag because the name/word will never show up in Nastaliq script and will always be in Naskh script. Plus, inserting a tag into another tag will not work either. Can you please revert all your such edits for the Afghan cities? Thank you.

You also mistyped the Persian writing for Fayzabad, Badakhshan ([1]), I corrected it. Cabolitæ (talk) 16:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do have the Nastaliq font, but it doesn't show up for me. Probably you've got the Urdu/Pakistani Nastaliq. Even if it shows up, it is not scholarly. In Afghanistan and in Iran, all the official documents, academic books and all other written materials are written with Naskh script. That's because it is easy to read when the font size is small, and the letters are distinguishable. However, Nastaliq is mostly used in poetry and some calligraphic works, or in everyday hand-writing in Afghanistan and Iran. So in English wikipedia articles, we should also write them in Naskh script, just like the Persian wikipedia.
By double tag, I meant that you are inserting the Nastaliq tag within the Persian-script tag. Cabolitæ (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I have reverted all of my edits. By the way, I'm a big history buff, so are there any articles having to do with Afghan history (&c.) that need work/info/sources? I'd love to help out in any way I can!
Hi! Thank you for reverting them :-) Well you can browse through the articles, and almost all articles need a lot of work. To start with, you can choose a specific period in the Afghan history on which you feel more comfortable in editing, and then you can start improving the related articles; like Pre-Islamic period, Middle-Ages, or modern history. You can also check some categories and templates from where you can easily browse into the other articles; for example Category:History_of_Afghanistan and Template:History_of_Afghanistan. Cabolitæ (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On the wikipedia article, History of Afghanistan, the user "Lagoo sab" reverted my edits once more. I had fixed many grammatical issues and punctuation and it seems as though you had tried to revert it back to my edits again. Well, the user reverted it again...can you help me out?--MShefa (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan remained under the control of the British empire until 1919? This is wrong Afghanistan was never under British empire but Pakistan and India were.--Lagoo sab (talk) 22:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan's foreign affairs remained controlled by the British Empire, however, the country in total was not. Such is why you will see "1919" printed on the Afghan flag as the year of the country's independence.--MShefa (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know all the details about the history but British never controlled Afghanistan. British controlling Afghanistan's foreign affairs at the time, which was just with Russia and British, is not controlling the country. They way you wrote the sentence makes unaware people assume that British ruled Afghanistan like all the other countries they did at the time. The 1919 printed on the flag is irrelevant.--Lagoo sab (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well then I will just have to refer you to the main wikipedia article on Afghanistan, in which it says, very simply, "On August 19, 1919, following the third Anglo-Afghan war, the country regained independence from the United Kingdom over its foreign affairs."
It says "the country regained independence", over the first time in 1709 or 1747. August 19, 1919 is when Afghanistan finally gained recognition by Britian as a completely independent sovereign state as it was before their involvement. This is similar to how a nation is recognized today by the United Nations but at that time (in 1919) there was no U.N. and Britian was in charge of all affairs in Asia, they controlled most of the region except Afghanistan and Russia.--Lagoo sab (talk) 17:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Day Drunk Gays (series) (April 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paghman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarobi District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Day Drunk Gays (series), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conjugate Edit

[edit]

Please allow scholars to edit important linguistics points in a given language. This is very important for an encyclopedia. With average knowledge of language that goal cannot be achieved. One does not alter language heritage of nation with guesses. Shoma farsi zabanid but in your house 'ketaab -e- shahname hast. Please read rahbarekherad.blogspot.com for a Persian text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.47.92 (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MShefa. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Day Drunk Gays (series)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Day Drunk Gays (series)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Episcopal Church (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American colonies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bel Air Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, MShefa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fujifilm superia

[edit]

Howdy. We shouldn't just keep track of current things. This is an encyclopedia not a product catalog. An appropriate action is to mark the items as having fallen out of production not sanitize all mention of them from the encyclopedia. Please reapply my edits and update the article text to clarify which products are current. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostwickenator (talkcontribs) 20:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MShefa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, MShefa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]