User talk:MarialeegRVT
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| For your hard work on animal health pages and animal pages in general. ApproximateLand (talk) 02:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]
Your edit to Swimmer puppy syndrome has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about the rather totalitarian tone of this pre-written message. To clarify a bit: it's not OK to copy even limited amounts of non-free text from external sources into this project unless it is clearly identified as a quotation – it's against our copyright policy to do so, and such copied text is routinely removed and hidden from view. If you think there might be other pages where you have done the same thing, even on a small scale, would you kindly mention them here so that they too can be cleaned up? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I now see that you were warned about this by Diannaa in 2020. Please take extra care to write entirely in your own words from now on – another problem of this nature might lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to message you re: another article you have been editing. Specifically the veterinary dentistry article. How can I message you properly? I don't use this platform very often and I have spent 30 minutes trying to figure out how to contact you. MarialeegRVT (talk) 15:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- [1] was this edit a quotation/copy of the article? Traumnovelle (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Are these also copied? [2] [3] Traumnovelle (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please respond, even if you don't remember if they were copied or not. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- [1] was this edit a quotation/copy of the article? Traumnovelle (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Cat massage
[edit]MarialeegRVT, you wrote on my user talk-page: "The added content was the rewording of the existing paragraphs to sound less colloquial and more encyclopedic; no additional information was inserted. Please take a moment to review the revision and you will find that the history corroborates this". Could you please identify in this revision of that page the content that you were trying to rephrase? And explain why you rewrote it using content from here? To help you understand why this is a problem, here is a comparison of your addition to the page with the text of the source:
| Our article | The source |
|---|---|
| Massage should not be performed over open wounds, around unstable fractures, or when a cat is experiencing pain that is not yet appropriately controlled. Massage should be applied with caution in cats with blood-clotting problems. Do not massage directly over tumors. | Massage should not be performed over open wounds, around unstable fractures, or when a cat is experiencing pain that is not yet appropriately controlled. Massage should be applied with caution in cats with blood-clotting problems, and we should not massage directly over areas that are infected or over tumors. |
I've left a similar comparison of your edit with the source text at Talk:Veterinary dentistry. I've said before that I find all this deeply disappointing; it's beginning to look as if we will need to check every single one of your 1700+ edits. I've spent more time than I wanted to looking into this today, and will have to look further tomorrow. It'd be helpful if you could acknowledge that you understand why such edits are unacceptable in this project, and how you plan to avoid making any more of them in future. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I was referring to my edit on cat massage re: the rewording of the paragraph. I am not able to see that edit anymore so I don't know how to show you it was just a grammar update. I could see it yesterday though. Look, I was just trying to be helpful and make veterinary articles on Wikipedia better. I thought as long as I was citing the source, then I wasn't doing anything wrong. I am sorry for creating work for you - it was unintentional. I won't edit anything again, even if the block is removed. This has all been very upsetting for me and I don't want to fight about it. It was an honest mistake and I have gotten the point. Any physical sources I ever used are listed in the reference sections of the articles, so I don't think I can be of any further assistance in the investigation. Honestly, just go ahead and delete every edit I ever made. I give up. Take care. MarialeegRVT (talk) 16:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)- MarialeegRVT, I'm afraid that there's just too much evidence – both in your edits and in your discussion of them – that you don't understand our copyright policy well enough to be allowed to continue to contribute here, so with great regret I have suspended your editing rights.
- I intend to request a contributor copyright investigation of all your edits to date, with clean-up where required. However, I recognise that your purpose here has always been to improve the encyclopaedia, so I want you to understand that 'indefinite' does not mean 'permanent'. I will be pleased to unblock your account once the investigation is complete, provided that you can by then demonstrate clear understanding of our copyright policy. In the meanwhile, it would be very helpful if you would identify for us where you have copied content from external sources into our pages, and where from. You're in a much better position to do this than many of us who do not have unlimited access to veterinary textbooks. Please let me know if you'd be prepared to help with this; if so, I'll post a list of articles to be checked on this page for you to work from. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
CCI Notice
[edit]Hello, MarialeegRVT. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)