User talk:MikiBishop

MikiBishop

Your thread has been archived

Hi MikiBishop! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, loss of ability to edit, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi MikiBishop! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, film, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:David Paulides. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 07:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Teleohapsis. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC) I forgot that I have to be transparent here so I'm supposed to place my response here? just in case here it is:

That's fine, Doug, It looks like I won't be able to stay at wikipedia much longer. I've made one comment, and that was a message for Susan only, - Sgerbic - who is a good person. She's mature, very kind, and willing to help new people. She's knowledgeable, and wikipedia, instead of trusting her and giving her some freedom, she has to jump through even more hoops now when she's already jumped through so many hoops in these many years she's been so loyal to wikipedia. Isn't she an administrator yet? Anarchist is probably the only one powerful enough to turn that bio around, so I wonder why he isn't more inspired in his role at wikipedia to be a force for the good in everything he works on. I just don't think the answer to keeping the best people in line is transparency instead of trust, and for the "newbies," negative threats like 'straighten up or be blocked' when they reach out to you for help. Why are the rest of the people working on that page so motivated toward the negative? Maybe something is wrong with the way wikipedia handles people. wikipedia can't blame it on the individuals not being nice enough all of the time. Editors start out here and their only contact for guidance from higher-ups is some verbal abuse for doing things the wrong way. Anyway, goodbye. Wikipedia is becomming massively powerful in the world, like it's gotten a huge bump upward now. I with it wouldn't squander the opportunity MikiBishop (talk) 22:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC) MikiBishop (talk) 23:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC) [ reply ]