Jump to content

User talk:Abdulsulsag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Muzikhytegh)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Muzikhytegh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MuzikHyte Ghana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 04:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MuzikHyte Ghana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 (talk) 04:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 07:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abdulsulsag (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Ceo of Muzikhyte Gh

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your inappropriate edits or describe in general terms what edits you would make if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 02:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

197.251.240.17 (talk) 02:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abdulsulsag (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I am no longer associated or have anything to do with the organisation whose name I used as my username earlier and I am not in anyway editing for any sort of payment or gifts

Decline reason:

You are saying you are not paid as the CEO of your company? I don't think so. You don't have to be specifically paid to edit Wikipedia to have a paid editing relationship. Please read about conflict of interest and paid editing. You still have not said what you want to edit about if unblocked- which is important as you won't be unblocked to edit about your company or anything related to your conflict of interest. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abdulsulsag (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I am no more the CEO of MuzikHyteGh. I no longer have any relations whatsoever with the above mentioned. I am acting on my own free will and so shall I create or edit any wikis that I can contribute to. I would like to support the community by creating some pages that people are already searching to know more information about. An example is "Best Friends In The World" - A web series that was started by a group called triple J. I found out about them after following them on Youtube a year ago. Here is their channel [1]. Also, I have already helped in editing some Wikipedia page without using my account. I want to be fully recognized as a contributor to the Wikipedia Society. Some of the pages include Davido, Nana Appiah Mensah, DJ Arafat, and Yolo_(Ghanaian TV Series) among many others Wikipedia pages. Changing the username for me will facilitate me to start/create important pages when the need be and my contributions to Wikipedia will also be noticed. NB: I created the account when I was a novice and knows little to nothing about the violations of Wikipedia, that was three years ago. I didn't even know how to create Wikipedia pages by then. From now onward, if my request for unblocking is approved I will take full responsibility and do not violate any of the Wikipedia rules.

Decline reason:

You've been spamming Wikipedia while logged out. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So you stopped being the CEO in the day or so since you said you were the CEO? Regarding "Also, I have already helped in editing some Wikipedia page without using my account."; so you have evaded your block? Someone else will review your request, but these points need to be addressed. 331dot (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Muzikhytegh to Abdulsulsag

[edit]

globally renamed Muzikhytegh to Abdulsulsag-- Deepfriedokra 03:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdulsulsag (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think you are getting me wrong with my statements. I do believe in the policies of Wikipedia and I do not believe I have been spamming Wikipedia, as I stated earlier if I ever did then it was within my naive days where I had not gone through the rules of Wikipedia and have received punishment for that. In reference to my statement that I helped edit some Wikipedia page even though I was logged out, I believe Wikipedia allows people to contribute to it anonymously and frows against copyright material and spamming and would at any time delete contents which go against the policies. I believe you might have gotten my statement wrong unless you have evidence of me spamming. My ISP provides dynamic IPs and I bet it could be a different user on the same IP. I keep on reading the rules governing Wikipedia editing each day to become abreast of them. I have no intention of spamming Wikipedia now or in the future with contributions that are not relevant to the topics I contribute to. I only love to contribute to the community ad be recognized only for that. I would like to kindly reconsider your decision and unblock me. Thank you in advance

Decline reason:

No acknowledgement of your spamming. Also block evasion and this is now a check user block which means you can only be unblocked by a CU. Enough time has been wasted on all the unblock requests. I am revoking your TPA. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2019

[edit]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Ad Orientem (talk) 05:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ title= Neptune3 Studios; Producers of Best Friends In The World | url=https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCl71WmqkG8BjVuySOSCh_Q