User talk:WhiteStar2000/Archive/2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:WhiteStar2000. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Article issues
- Hello, You apparently made some edits to L. V. Locsin Building and appear to be a principal contributor. Providing a source is a good thing to affect the removal of tags. An area of concern is that this article, as well as several others, are sourced using single primary sources. The articles survived AFD by "ONLY" a "procedural close" because mass AFD's are generally frowned upon. Other issues were not dealt with and since WP:notability is not advanced by primary sources the issue of single sourcing that can be considered non-independent of the subject, could result in more nominations. The original nominator could have immediately gone this route, as echoed by consensus and the closing, so additional reliable sources would be prudent.
- When making edits that address tags, and these improvements cause or result in situations actually calling for a different or degraded tag, replacement with a proper tag is important and not unreasonable. Maintenance tags place articles in certain categories and are not a "wall of shame". I will be adding relevant tags and if you wish to make changes identified then please remove the tags. Otr500 (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Shang Salcedo Place
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. UnitedPhilippines, thanks for creating Shang Salcedo Place!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand, if possible. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Babymissfortune 13:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Lepanto Building has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable standard building, fails WP:GEOFEAT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
UTRS
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #20830 was submitted on Mar 11, 2018 03:23:56. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 03:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21089 was submitted on Apr 04, 2018 00:11:55. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Request for Unblock by MagicJulius00
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia before the first half of 2018 ends. I want to edit and create more pages in this website. I have changed my email address yesterday. My former sockpuppet account User:MagicJulius will no longer suffer from this. Thank you and have a good day.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 01:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
April 4, 2018
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand what I have been blocked for. I promise that I will be a good contributor of this website and I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. I will also promise that I will not make more accounts under my name. Thank you and have a good day.
Decline reason:
What were you blocked for then? I don't see any indication you actually understand. You will need to acknowledge your block, list any and all accounts you have edited under in the past, and then we can discuss possibly unblocking you in 6 months. If this block was a mistake, you can make an appeal here trying to explain why, but as it is a CheckUser block, only a CheckUser or ArbCom can approve an unblock. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
May 4, 2018
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia before the year 2018 ends. I want to edit and create more pages in this website. If I am unblocked, I will decide to merge this account and my former sockpuppet account, User:MagicJulius. I move that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for. I will commit that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Thank you and have a good day.
Decline reason:
Please see previous declined request. What you want is of no concern to us. Unless you demonstrate (not claim) that you understand why you were blocked, list all of your other accounts, and provide some sort of indication of what you will do if unblocked, your next appeal is likely to be your last. Yunshui 雲水 08:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Supposed to be the (My) Last Appeal
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia before the year 2018 ends because I want to edit and create more pages in this website. If I am unblocked, I will be a good and nice contributor. I will edit pages that are unsourced and articles that does not cite any references and I will not make multiple accounts anymore in Wikipedia. I move that the block is no longer necessary because I realize that sockpuppetry is illegal and prohibited by the laws that are imposed in Wikipedia. I will commit that I will make useful contributions in this website from now on if I am unblocked. This is the last time that I will appeal my block. If I cannot be unblocked, I would rather to leave Wikipedia instead or I also would move that my accounts (User: MagicJulius and User: UnitedPhilippines) should be deleted. Yesterday, my former sockpuppet account User:MagicJulius decided to leave Wikipedia and will no longer be a sockpuppet of this account. Thank you and have a good day.
Decline reason:
You demonstrate a profound lack of understanding here. MagicJulius didn't decide to leave Wikipedia, for example, it was blocked. Note that we cannot delete accounts. Thank you for agreeing to stop making any further pointless unblock requests. This stops us wasting any more time here. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Message to User:Bbb23
First of all, I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia before the year 2018 ends because I want to edit and create more pages in this website. If you will unblock me, I will be a good and nice contributor from now on. I will edit pages that are unsourced and articles that does not cite any references and I will not make multiple accounts anymore in Wikipedia. I move that the block is no longer necessary because I realize that sockpuppetry is illegal and prohibited by the laws that are imposed in Wikipedia. I admit my mistakes as a contributor and I will change myself from now on. I will commit that I will make useful contributions in this website from now on if I am unblocked. If you will not unblock me, I would rather to leave Wikipedia instead. My former sockpuppet account User:MagicJulius will no longer active. Thank you and have a good day. UnitedPhilippines (talk) 12:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- You stated previously that you would not appeal your block any further. The above statement directly contradicts this. Your best and only hope is WP:SO, which requires six months with zero edits. Even then, you'll have to demonstrate substantially more honesty and understanding of our policies, when requesting an unblock. Reminder: zero edits, for at least six months. Zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for reminder. I will commit that I will wait and will not edit for six months starting today, May 4 until November 4, 2018 and I will appeal my block after six months. Thank you and have a good day.
This user violated that promise via WowMagic18 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I am sorry and I will commit that I will not edit in English Wikipedia for more than 6 months. I am so excited to edit again but my excitement became a nonsense excitement. I will not violate any rules in this website. I will also add that I will no longer make sockpuppet accounts anymore. Thank you and have a good day. UnitedPhilippines (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- You've demonstrated we can't trust your word. You have now violated WP:3STRIKES and are banned by the community. WP:SO is no longer available to you. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I have a question, how can I appeal my ban from English Wikipedia? Thanks.UnitedPhilippines (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Competence is required. I'm revoking talk page access because you no longer have a place here. --Yamla (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You tried to appeal your case. No. Obviously not. You clearly understood that you had to make zero edits for six months, clearly agreed to do so, and then broke your word. You set up an account to evade your block. You've shown, over and over again, that we can't trust you. That's it, that's the end of the line. Don't email me again. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Response to your email
You have been given multiple opportunities to show that you understand why you were blocked, and did not do so. You repeatedly said that you would not edit for six months, but did so, attempting to hide the fact that you doing so. You said that you would no longer appeal your block, but did so. Your talk page access was removed to prevent you wasting any more administrator time with your pointless unblock requests, and you then tried to do so by email instead of by talk page posts. I shall remove your email access.I shall make a note to restore your talk page access in six months, and if you are lucky I shall see that note and follow it up: if so you may appeal your ban, though unless you do so in a very different way from anything you have done up to now your chance of success is likely to be none. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21978 was submitted on Jul 06, 2018 04:35:39. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 04:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23672 was submitted on Dec 29, 2018 05:09:06. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 05:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
2019
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Like what was advised to me after I appeal recently my block to UTRS, I read my recent block appeals in this user page and I realized that all of those appeals are weak so I will appeal again. I appeal because I want to be unblocked and unbanned in Wikipedia in these reasons: I want my three accounts be abandoned as soon as possible (User:UnitedPhilippines02, User:MagicJulius and User:WowMagic18) for to be unblocked, I want also to show my good behavior as a page mover, page creator and editor in Tagalog Wikipedia, I want to edit and create many pages in Wikipedia, I will follow the rules and regulations of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and lastly, I want to change my username. For almost ten months as a blocked user and seven months as a banned user until now, I focus on editing, creating and moving pages in Tagalog Wikipedia and creating new items in Wikidata while waiting to be unblocked. If unblocked, I will continue what I have done in Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects, will follow rules in Wikipedia, ask help from other users on how to cite sources in an article and others and will edit only under one account, User:MagicJulius00. Thank you and have a good day! MagicJulius00 (talk) 10:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Only one open unblock request is needed at a time. SQLQuery me! 06:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You've repeatedly made promises in the past and then immediately broken those promises. You've repeatedly lied in the past. We aren't talking a long time ago, we are talking May of 2018. What's changed? What specifically has changed between then and now, such that we can now trust your word? Also, is it your intention to only edit the Tagalog Wikipedia, as you imply in your request, or do you wish to edit the English Wikipedia, too? You did not address why you violated WP:SOCK in the past, nor your history of inappropriate editing. I strongly advise you to change your request to address these specific points. Finally, are you asking to be unbanned? You haven't asked that your request be copied over to the appropriate discussion board for community discussion. --Yamla (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
You'll also want to address your abuse of the email feature while you were banned. --Yamla (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Like what was advised to me after I appeal recently my block to UTRS, I read my recent block appeals in this user page and I realized that all of those appeals are weak so I will appeal again. I appeal because I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia in these reasons: I want my three accounts be abandoned as soon as possible (User:UnitedPhilippines02, User:MagicJulius and User:WowMagic18) for to be unblocked, I want also to show my good behavior as a page mover, page creator and editor in Tagalog Wikipedia, I also wish to edit the English Wikipedia, I will follow the rules and regulations of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and lastly, I want to change my username. For almost ten months as a blocked user and seven months as a banned user until now, I focus on editing, creating and moving pages in Tagalog Wikipedia and creating new items in Wikidata while waiting to be unblocked. I want to answer the question why I violated WP:SOCK in the past. The answer is because I created three other sockpuppet accounts that I mention here. If unblocked, I will continue what I have done in Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects and will edit the English Wikipedia carefully, will follow rules in Wikipedia, ask help from other users on how to cite sources in an article and others and will edit only under one account, User:MagicJulius00. I want to ask that my request be copied over to the appropriate discussion board for community discussion. Thank you and have a good day! MagicJulius00 (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Only one open unblock request is needed at a time. SQLQuery me! 06:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
"I want to answer the question why I violated WP:SOCK in the past. The answer is because I created three other sockpuppet accounts that I mention here." That indicates only that you did violate WP:SOCK, not why. Nor why we should trust you not to violate it in the future. Nor have you addressed your abuse of the email feature or why we should trust your word now, given your history of breaking it. Nor have you addressed your inappropriate edits in the past. Finally, one unban request at a time. Posting multiple unban requests makes it hard to determine which one you want copied over. --Yamla (talk) 12:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I violated WP:SOCK because I want to edit using other account and to circumvent a block. I also abused my email feature because I change my email addresses over time and I used it to email a user or administrator for him or her to read my appeal. Why should you trust me? My answer is because I had many realizations since I was blocked until today and because I showed it when I started editing in other Wikimedia projects. Since I edited Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects, I became a good editor and I don't edit a page if I feel that my edit can lead me as a blocked user and I will do it if unblocked in English Wikipedia. I made many inappropriate edits in the past to add, remove, or put fake or hoax informations in English Wikipedia. Lastly, I regret for the violations that I committed in the past. This is my last unban request. MagicJulius00 (talk) 13:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Only one open unblock request is needed at a time. SQLQuery me! 06:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You now have three unblock/unban requests. Join them into one and I'll copy them over to the noticeboard. I won't endorse unbanning you, but I'll start the process to have your ban reviewed. --Yamla (talk) 13:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Like what was advised to me after I appeal recently my block to UTRS, I read my recent block appeals in this user page and I realized that all of those appeals are weak so I will appeal again. I appeal because I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia in these reasons: I want my three accounts be abandoned as soon as possible (User:UnitedPhilippines02, User:MagicJulius and User:WowMagic18) for to be unblocked, I want also to show my good behavior as a page mover, page creator and editor in Tagalog Wikipedia, I also wish to edit the English Wikipedia, I will follow the rules and regulations of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and lastly, I want to change my username. For almost ten months as a blocked user and seven months as a banned user until now, I focus on editing, creating and moving pages in Tagalog Wikipedia and creating new items in Wikidata while waiting to be unblocked. I want to answer the question why I violated WP:SOCK in the past. The answer is because I created three other sockpuppet accounts that I mention here. If unblocked, I will continue what I have done in Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects and will edit the English Wikipedia carefully, will follow rules in Wikipedia, ask help from other users on how to cite sources in an article and others and will edit only under one account, User:MagicJulius00. I violated WP:SOCK because I want to edit using other account and to circumvent a block. I also abused my email feature because I change my email addresses over time and I used it to email a user or administrator for him or her to read my appeal. Why should you trust me? My answer is because I had many realizations since I was blocked until today and because I showed it when I started editing in other Wikimedia projects. Since I edited Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects, I became a good editor and I don't edit a page if I feel that my edit can lead me as a blocked user and I will do it if unblocked in English Wikipedia. I made many inappropriate edits in the past to add, remove, or put fake or hoax informations in English Wikipedia. And lastly, I regret for the violations that I committed in the past and remedy this. I want to ask that my request be copied over to the appropriate discussion board for community discussion. Thank you and have a good day! MagicJulius00 (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Account is abandoned per [1], editor no longer wishes to edit here. SQLQuery me! 00:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
STOP IT. You now have four open unblock requests. One. ONE. ONE UNBLOCK REQUEST, NOT FOUR. ONE UNBLOCK REQUEST. WP:CIR applies here and if your next edit is not to reduce the number of unblock requests from four to one, I will revoke your access to this page. ONE UNBLOCK REQUEST. --Yamla (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
You have refused to follow the instructions provided, and have refused to answer the questions I asked. Are you absolutely sure you want the above copied over to a discussion board? Or would you like to go back, follow the instructions, and answer the questions asked? --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23746 was submitted on Jan 11, 2019 08:14:53. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 08:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Block evasion
This user engaged in block evasion as WowMagic18 in January, 2019. Note that WowMagic18 was already blocked, so the user was only able to edit their talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #25785 was submitted on Jul 02, 2019 13:20:01. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
July 3, 2019
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appeal because I want to be unblocked in Wikipedia because: I want also to show my good behavior as a page mover, page creator and editor in Tagalog Wikipedia, I also wish to edit the English Wikipedia, I will follow the rules and regulations of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and lastly, I want to change my username. For almost a year as a blocked user and as a banned user until now, I focus on editing, creating and moving pages in Tagalog Wikipedia and creating new items in Wikidata while waiting to be unblocked. I want to answer the question why I violated WP:SOCK in the past. The answer is because I created three other sockpuppet accounts that I mention here. If unblocked, I will continue what I have done in Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects and will edit the English Wikipedia carefully, will follow rules in Wikipedia, ask help from other users on how to cite sources in an article and others and will edit only under one account, User:MagicJulius00. I violated WP:SOCK because I want to edit using other account and to circumvent a block. I also abused my email feature because I change my email addresses over time and I used it to email a user or administrator for him or her to read my appeal. Why should you trust me? My answer is because I had many realizations since I was blocked until today and because I showed it when I started editing in other Wikimedia projects. Since I edited Tagalog Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects, I became a good editor and I don't edit a page if I feel that my edit can lead me as a blocked user and I will do it if unblocked in English Wikipedia. I made many inappropriate edits in the past to add, remove, or put fake or hoax informations in English Wikipedia. And lastly, I regret for the violations that I committed in the past and remedy this. I want to ask that my request be copied over to the appropriate discussion board for community discussion. Thank you and have a good day! MagicJulius00 (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined per block evasion, socking, check user report. User is admonished for making an appeal when they have recently socked-- again. I will remind user that the WP:CBAN was for recalcitrant and recidivistic socking. I suppose a WP:standard offer appeal is theoretically possible six months from now. Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #25882 was submitted on Jul 12, 2019 10:11:21. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 10:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
unblock appeal, CBAN
@Bbb23: Carry to community? Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Dlohcierekim: I have blocked the following accounts as
Confirmed (the last three are sleepers):
- GoodLife123 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bernilyn benesio (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mycadaniellabacar (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Agundolance0613 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- The user has also evaded their block with at least one IP.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, bang goes this application. Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have removed talk page access-- again. Please do not request unblock via WP:UTRS for six months. The usual remedies listed at WP:GAB remain. Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Ramon Magsaysay Center in early 1980s.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
UTRS 30226
WhiteStar2000/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #30226 was submitted on 2020-04-22 03:22:53. This review is now closed.
--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 08:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Before I carry this to WP:AN, Checkuser needed --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 08
- 31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Based on the limited data I have access to, I can't see recent evidence of any socking in the CU results. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Callanecc: Thanks, I should like to carry CBAN appeal to WP:AN if that's OK. MagicJulius00, assuming it is OK, please let us know here when you are ready to respond. I have restored TPA. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Thank you for restoring my TPA. I am now ready to respond on the future comments here. User:MagicJulius00 08:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- My pleasure carrying over. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: I just want to say that I have many realizations after I have blocked and banned. Also, I cannot leave Wikipedia because I contribute on the other projects that are connected with English Wikipedia. I propose that if I will be unblocked and unbanned, I will edit more articles as I can, put references and sources there, will not do any vandalism, and will ask for assistance or help from other users if needed. Also, I will not do any sockpuppetry again. It became too late for me to understand why I became a banned and blocked user but now I fully understand and have reflected on my wrongdoings in the past. [I want this be inserted in WP:AN.] MagicJulius00 23:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Hi! MagicJulius00 07:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have just closed your appeal as successful and I have unblocked you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Congrats! Foxnpichu (talk) 22:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have just closed your appeal as successful and I have unblocked you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
By the way, where can I appeal my ban? Thank you (aka DQ)! Can I edit my username? MagicJulius00 10:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)