User talk:Vahurzpu

Welcome!

Hello, Vahurzpu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Nott Nott 01:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Vahurzpu! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:57, Monday, February 26, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Re your removal

On 23 April 2018 You removed the fact that Dorothy Dietrich was proclaimed the "first lady of magic" way before a latter day female magician, partly because "the citation is a tabloid". This does not change the fact that legendary magician Dorothy Dietrich was described with that reference many years before and it was most likely copied from her. No woman in magic, for even the shortest amount of time, would not be aware of the position Dorothy Dietrich has forged in the business as a early groundbreaking pioneer female magician. You as well!

That said women magician is not even in the business and has fallen by the wayside for many years as far as I can tell.

http://www.dorothydietrich.com/FirstLadyOfMagicFemaleHoudini.html ‎

Respectfully Dick Brookz The Houdini Museum, Scranton, PA magicus@comcast.net

April 2018

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to .30-06 Springfield wildcat cartridges— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 01:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C.S. Monroe Technology Center has been accepted

C.S. Monroe Technology Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False positive

Sorry about the false positive. I'm new to edit filters, and didn't correctly consider the consequences of mine. Anything with Dan should be able to go through now.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vahurzpu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. Since you had some involvement with the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going through WP:JCW much?

You seem to be doing a lot of citation-related cleanup/fixing recently. Are you making use of WP:JCW for it, or are you search for problematic citations through other means? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Headbomb: I have been using JCW, specifically the potentially problematic patterns page; I don't know of any other method that would allow me to find issues so quickly. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thought so. I was doing some similar cleanup, and I noticed you took care of several of them already, so I though the coincidence was too high. I usually take care of the following

A Publication of...
Digital libraries
Identifiers (I'm skipping the ISBNs, so do feel free to tackle those)
Legalese
Official Journal
Peer review
Special Issues
Weird stuff
Curly ’

Within a day or two of database updates, so don't spend time on those. Everything else is too numerous for me to quickly tackle, so help there is always appreciated.

Anyway, watch the page, I've been tweaking patterns. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Howard W. Gill

I want to say thanks for 'Wiki-ing' that portrait of Howard Gill, on the Worthpoint. I think Glenn L. Martin(the Martin in Lockheed-Martin) might have had it and recalled his friend Gill whose life was cut short in a crash. Koplimek (talk) 17:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 15 § Template:Use shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Nick Thorne ^talk 08:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Attribution on translations

Hey, thanks for your advice. I will do this in the pages I translate.--Limesa143 (talk) 19:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agglutination test (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I had previously marked this as promising because it is a notable topic. I could not evaluate the sources at the time as they were improperly formatted (see history of this page). Now that the references have been fixed it is clear that most of the sources do not meet WP:MEDRS standards - they are largely primary sources, sometimes very old. Furthermore several of the references that I checked do not support the statements made. e.g. ref 9 does not say anything to the effect of "This test is performed by a scientist or lab technician in the laboratory who will then provide the agglutination test results to the doctor or medical professional"; the statement that "The slide agglutination test does not provide quantitative analysis." is referenced to a paper about a quantitative slide agglutination test. I believe what happened here is that the author wrote the article first and then searched for sources to add, rather than writing the article based on the sources, and was not especially careful to check that the sources support the content. Also, there are some obvious errors such as saying that saliva and urine samples are used to detect antigens in the serum and that spinal anesthesia is a method for collecting CSF (??) Unfortunately, while this is a worthy topic I cannot accept it in this state.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agglutination test and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Agglutination test, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vahurzpu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spicy (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BotApproved

Wait for the bot flag before unleashing the bot. @Xaosflux: usually takes care of that pretty fast though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done bibliomaniac 1 5 05:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vahurzpu, please have the bot link to the BRFA in its edit summaries. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 10:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Vahurzpu, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
★Trekker (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DYK for Winnie ille Pu

On 29 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Winnie ille Pu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Latin translation of Winnie-the-Pooh spent 20 weeks on The New York Times Best Seller list? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winnie ille Pu. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Winnie ille Pu), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starry-eyed

		The Diligent Librarian Barnstar
		For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	I really appreciate your help in improving Blue check mark (Twitter)! Thanks for your excellent contributions :) Yitz (talk) 06:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving parenthetical citations to short footnotes

Hi. The decision at the RfC was to deprecate parenthetical citations to short footnotes, not tags. If you wish to convert the article similar to its parent article Actuary, by all means, but please do bot blithely use tagged format. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see detiled instruction on how to properly convert parenthetical citation to shortened footnotes at commons:File:Converting Harvard citations to shortened footnotes (sfn).pdf. Please also see WP:SFN & Help:Shortened footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 06:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray and Avraham: Neither the RFC closure statement nor Wikipedia:Citing sources#Parenthetical referencing refer to any particular successor format; rather, both state that conversion should be "into currently accepted formats". That being said, I don't object to someone converting the article to use short footnotes; I was just converting from a deprecated format to a particular well-supported one. Vahurzpu (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vahurzpu/Parenthetical editnotices for deletion

On User:Vahurzpu/Parenthetical editnotices for deletion, most of the articles had been converted to either all or predominately shortened footnote style, but the editnotices had not. I took care of updating the editnotices for those articles to {{Shortened footnote editnotice}}. There were a couple which were mixed style or all regular footnotes, & I took care of blanking those editnotices.

The only one that was on the list that truly had been parenthetical referencing was Wah-wah (music), which you converted to regular footnote style. Only when I have the time, will I revert it then immediately set about converting it to the shortened footnotes that will better suit the original editorial intent.

There was a historical inaccuracy in that shortened footnotes were lumped in with the {{Parenthetical referencing editnotice}}. This was corrected last fall. However, not all editnotices have been updated yet.

I will note that the the Parenthetical referencing editnotice does state If you have previously used this template for pages using the shortened footnote citation style, please switch to the {{Shortened footnote editnotice}}. Similarly, the {{Use Harvard referencing}} template states Please consider using shortened footnotes or another citation style instead, and forgoing the use of this template. I believe that shortened footnotes are generally the best replacement for parenthetical / Harvard referencing.

Thank you for your patience with this. Peaceray (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray: Thanks for cleaning up those editnotices. I don't intend to convert any more articles in the future, but I'll keep your note in mind if I end up doing so. Vahurzpu (talk) 07:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Variety magazine

Hello Vahurzpu, you helped me obtain a Variety page in the past on the ResourceExchange, and I was just wondering is this something you were able to find through the Wikipedia Library? I'm going far back in time at this point to 1980 for The Empire Strikes Back, and my best luck has been on Gale, but that only goes back as far as 1997 in terms of full text. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Darkwarriorblake: I found it via ProQuest, and at least some subset of ProQuest is available via the Wikipedia Library. However, I typically use my university's subscription, since it's more convenient for me; it's very possible that the article was within the scope of my university's subscription but not TWL's. Vahurzpu (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...I think I did try ProQuest but perhaps my searching was not as precise. Plus the document you got for me was post 1990 so perhaps it's just easier to get more recent stuff. Thanks for the information Vahurzpu, I'll put it to good use! Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's my fault, I was just using the default ProQuest search instead of under magazines. There's like 91000 articles here. Thanks Vahurzpu. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:45, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Law of 4 February 1794

Hello! Your submission of Law of 4 February 1794 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Clarityfiend (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing too major.

DYK for Law of 4 February 1794

On 13 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Law of 4 February 1794, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while France abolished slavery in 1794, Napoleon reinstated it in 1802? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Law of 4 February 1794. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Law of 4 February 1794), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you! Much appreciated.

HarrisonFisher1982 (talk) 20:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected twist (for me)

Hey. Not sure if you were aware of yesterday's WP:AN#Government_of_Rhodesia_problematic_process_with_consequences_in_real_life (perm link). Just noting how strange I found how this incident unraveled — "only part time in an institution ... unsupervised internet access" — what? I really shouldn't jest about such matters. Still, never a dull moment! PS: I've been to well over half the states in the US, but by far, I've spent the most time in Virginia. Beautiful state. Many fond memories. Best, El_C 01:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Yeah, that whole situation was pretty confusing. A user in the Discord server (the only one of the regulars there not linked to any particular on-wiki user) posted that link and mentioned their suspicions about potential association with Klaus Bells, as well as the other hoax articles. From there I was able to dig up enough evidence to verify the connections. I will note TNT's closing comment on the SPI, and that Klaus Bells's explanation doesn't seem entirely consistent with their behavior.

I believe it's the most complicated scenario I've waded into so far in my editing career, and it's not over yet. It raised serious doubts about the reliability of "blastingnews.com", which is used hundreds of times across the wiki, and I believe there's still one more account and one more hoax out there, though I'm waiting a bit for more evidence. Vahurzpu (talk) 03:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: multiple more hoaxes out there; someone just pointed out a couple more to me. Vahurzpu (talk) 03:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? Please let it be Rhodesia-related!

Anyway, feel free to email me any evidence you wish to keep private at this juncture. El_C 04:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bhutan–Turkey relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Bhutan–Turkey relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion on Unusual articles

Thanks for this reversion of one of my edits. It looks like it was an unrecognized misclick on my part. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot's edits to Talk:Ryan Watson (politician)

Hello Vahurzpu - I have noticed that VahurzpuBot has edited Talk:Ryan Watson (politician) several times since September, incorrectly "Remove redirect-class assessment from non-redirect" when in fact the article IS a redirect. Please fix whatever error your bot is making. Thank you, PK T(alk) 15:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PKT: Sorry about that; I've fixed the issue. It appears that the page was not technically a redirect. For a proper redirect, the "#REDIRECT" line must come at the very beginning, but the short description was interfering with the software recognizing it. Per Wikipedia:Short description#Short descriptions on redirect pages I've moved it to stop that problem. The bot shouldn't mess with it any more (unless it's converted into an article); please let me know if it does. Vahurzpu (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect - thanks very much! PK T(alk) 19:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Vahurzpu!

Happy New Year!

Vahurzpu,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing redirects from non-redirects

It would be cool if your bot, while it was at it, could also remove redirects from non-redirects since other bots and editors don't. wbm1058 (talk) 20:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

False positive?

Hi @Vahurzpu, in this edit your bot removed a redirect-class assessment from a redirect, that's currently waiting waiting for RevDel. Is that intended? Nobody (talk) 05:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@1AmNobody24: nope, not intended. I just updated the bot so it should skip things marked for RD1 in the future. That being said, I'm not too worried about it, since once the redaction is complete and the page is a true redirect again, the template will automatically sense that the page is a redirect. Vahurzpu (talk) 06:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for taking a look. Nobody (talk) 06:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vahurzpu. If you wanted to expand the scope of task 1, you could remove |class=redirect from all pages, because redirects are always detected automatically so there is no need ever to specify this — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I considered doing this originally, but it would massively expand the scope of the task (editing hundreds of thousands of pages rather than a small handful per week). Also, at least when I wrote the bot, a few templates (MILHIST's among them) couldn't auto-detect redirects. That being said, I think their template now is {{WPBannerMeta}} based, so maybe this would no longer be an issue. Vahurzpu (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to open a BRFA to see if we can get approval for this big job? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look later this week when I have some time. Vahurzpu (talk) 01:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poke ... Could also do this with other non-article classes like Disambig too, if possible — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Drone congregation area

On 25 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Drone congregation area, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that no one knows how honeybee drones from hundreds of different colonies all converge on the same drone congregation areas to mate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drone congregation area. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Drone congregation area), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VahurzpuBot: Removing incorrect redirect class failure - Fixed

VahurzpuBot's task "Removing incorrect redirect class" failed to run per the configuration specified at Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 week, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VahurzpuBot: Removing incorrect redirect class failure

VahurzpuBot's task "Removing incorrect redirect class" failed to run per the configuration specified at Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 week, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]