Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Judaism. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
|
|
Judaism topics
[edit]- Beit Matityau Yeshiva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am not sure this yeshivah is notable. Unfortunately the Hebrew article isn’t much help in terms of providing additional sources. Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Judaism, and Israel. Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect mercifully to Yeshiva gedolah, since subject quite blatantly lacks sources that could support independent notability. -The Gnome (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Elijah Kahlenberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP that reads like an organisation article. Lots of interview and profiles, passing mentions. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 19:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Scope creep, I am the one who created the article. I have no financial relationship with the subject 66.112.246.20 (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am relatively new to wiki-editting, but happy to make any proper edits to avoid deletion. Just message me with some guided assistance and I will be happy to make changes. StepToMyLeft123 (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Judaism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and rename to Atidna (following AfD discussion). The article does read a bit WP:PROMO on the organization and could be trimmed, and coverage on Kahlenberg is in the context of coverage about Atidna. There's enough WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG nonetheless. Longhornsg (talk) 02:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Longhornsg: How is the organisation notable. It was created in 2002 and there is virtually no coverage on it, outside a few interviews with Kahlenberg. scope_creepTalk 11:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Scope creep It was created in 2022 actually and has over 30 interviews from different sources including from Al Jazeera, CNN, NPR, ABC News, Axios, etc listed. Quick search shows there are even more not even mentioned on the page. This meets notable standards. I say keep and rename, although the article is lengthy. It is probably better to split into two articles, one about Kahlenberg and one about Atidna. TheHalalanator (talk) 20:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant 2022. I would have to send the Atidna article to Afd. Its not notable as an organisation and would fail WP:NCORP. I see this is your first edit on Wikipedia. How did you managed to find this Afd I wonder. scope_creepTalk 09:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Scope creep It was created in 2022 actually and has over 30 interviews from different sources including from Al Jazeera, CNN, NPR, ABC News, Axios, etc listed. Quick search shows there are even more not even mentioned on the page. This meets notable standards. I say keep and rename, although the article is lengthy. It is probably better to split into two articles, one about Kahlenberg and one about Atidna. TheHalalanator (talk) 20:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Longhornsg: How is the organisation notable. It was created in 2002 and there is virtually no coverage on it, outside a few interviews with Kahlenberg. scope_creepTalk 11:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as is. After washing away the promotional or vanity stuff (e.g. "He aspires to become a professor of international law and contribute to peace efforts in the Middle East and, eventually, he also hopes to enter politics"), the text stands quite comfortably alone on the strong support of multiple sources of notability. -The Gnome (talk) 20:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I did a random check of a dozen or so sources and they seem to be mostly interviews in some form or another. There might be a stronger case for an article on the organisation (Atidna), but I'm undecided at this stage.-KH-1 (talk) 10:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There might indeed be a stronger presence of the Atidna organization than of our subject in the media. I confess I did not dedicate much time to Atidna. What I found about our subject, before I posted up my recommendation to Keep, was enough: We have enough sources supporting independent notability for a stand-alone article. Examples: The portrait of the "young Jewish peace activist" in the Times of Israel; a Daily Texan report on Kahlenberg's activism and on his scholarship; interviews in two major news media, one in Arab-speaking Al Jazeera, evidence of the person's media reach, and another in the Greek-speaking New World (Neos Kosmos); and so on. We're safe. -The Gnome (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)