Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 April 15
April 15
[edit]- - uploaded by Aivazovsky (notify | contribs).
- Image doesn't seem to be based on any source. I suspect original research. This is a map so it should be verifiable. Also the range seems to be a bit unhelpful jumping from 90K to 3000K -- Cat chi? 17:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Uploader was never notified about this deletion request. Relisting on May 11. howcheng {chat} 17:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not relevant to calculus, likely it is a low-resolution copy of another website's material, user seems to have been set-up to upload this image, image was used to vandalise Calculus [1] —
♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 08:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC). - As above. Radio Orange 14:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lesserredpanda (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, questionable encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Lesserredpanda (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, questionable licensing User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unsure of an encyclopedic use, questionable licensing User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, recently absent uploader, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not delete this image, as it is used in the article Bowing. I took the photo myself and added the text there myself. So please do not delete this, it is also very useful for the bowing article. ( Seong0980 13:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC) )
- Note, as has now been mentioned to the user, Image:Bownew.jpg is the image used in the article and the image being nominated for deletion is Image:Bow1_copy.jpg. As they are not identical, I am not able to tag as redundant.--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Compare Image:Bownew.jpg with Image:Bow1 copy.jpg. Bownew says it was taken "outside [uploader's] home". Bow copy says it was "taken during [uploader's] visit back to Seoul." Next, Bownew claims to be a "scanned personal photo". Bow copy is obviously scanned from print, with the ghosted lettering from the back of the page showing through. This looks pretty questionable, but assuming good faith, I guess the uploaded could have taken the photo himself and had it published which he then, in turn, scanned in and summarized incorrectly. This leaves two issues: Why not scan the original photo? Also, if he had the photo published he may not have sufficient rights to the license anymore. –Gunslinger47 18:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bluestripe (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Caruntu alex (notify | contribs).
- orphaned document, sole contribtution of user, is user's resume User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Dimplescutie (notify | contribs).
- orpahned image, absent uploader, I question the PD license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, low quality and unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Springeragh (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 00:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose you have plans to also delete Image:A username graphic for Sango123.png, Image:Sango1234.jpg and all other user graphics and images? After all, it's unencyclopedic too. — $PЯINGrαgђ 02:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, go ahead and delete it. I have another version that a friend fixed. — $PЯINGrαgђ 23:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, superseded by Image:Think outside the box.svg. (and yes, I am "that friend" :) Will (I hope they cannot see, I AM THE GREAT DESTROYER!) 20:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by The Statue With The Dictionary (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality BigDT 00:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, probably a copyvio BigDT 00:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, date watermark BigDT 00:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, date watermark BigDT 00:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Cedriconline (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, probably non-free BigDT 00:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Fossjunkie (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, a self-made logo, presumably for an A7-deleted article BigDT 00:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Prohacvice (notify | contribs).
- Tagged as pd-self, but gives a source website. It might be public domain as a Philippine government work (no idea if they are), but there isn't enough context to find out exactly where the image is from BigDT 00:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chipkomafia (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, a photo of somebody's basketball team BigDT 00:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Michael144 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
.JPG&action=delete){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=history){kind=link}
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, NOT free webhosting BigDT 00:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mohamadrejali (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, a very nice image of a bench, but given that this image is completely unlike this user's user-authored images, I suspect it is non-free BigDT 00:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 00:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Image is a logo "for a group of friends located in Louisiana. This group was formed randomly in the year 2006 by a girl named Su." — BazookaJoe 01:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic.- BazookaJoe 01:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chikinpotato11 (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Thelikelylad (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chris is me (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like this kept... takes up a tiny bit of space and it's supposed to be on my user page... If I were more active I'd re-add it sooner. -- Chris is me (user/review/talk) 14:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, most likely Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 02:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Tuntun Lopez (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by BScar23625 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
As the uploader, I have no problem with deletion. The image was used on the Cross Fell article until a better one was substituted in the same slot. Bob BScar23625 06:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by F16vipers@yahoo.com (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by CheetahKeeper (notify | contribs).
- Incorrectly tagged as a logo when it blatantly isn't one. — exolon 03:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- My appologies please help me change it, i must have hit the wrong tag button, once again my apologies.CheetahKeeper 04:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- See below
- Nominated on behalf of an anonymous user. These images can either be deleted alongside Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoff Johnson, or treated as orphans once the article is deleted. — Sigma 7 04:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, I think it may have been used in the now-deleted article "Rob Bryan" (judging by the user's talk page), insufficient context to determine encyclopedic value Iamunknown 06:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- No license given at source (ru:Image:Sholohov.jpg) Iamunknown 06:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by [[User talk:User:Ebinviswanath#Image:Blank Manorama2.jpg listed for deletion|User:Ebinviswanath]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:User:Ebinviswanath|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/User:Ebinviswanath|contribs]]).
- unecyclopedic image loaded to support the users' pov — Rajamankkan 09:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by [[User talk:User:Ebinviswanath#Image:Blank Manorama1.jpg listed for deletion|User:Ebinviswanath]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:User:Ebinviswanath|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/User:Ebinviswanath|contribs]]).
- unecyclopedic, pov-pushing — Rajamankkan 09:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Dantheman247 (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE, LQ —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- obsoleted by Image:Facebook Logo.svg Plop 13:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It's the new logo. The other version is the old logo. They changed it with the complete redesign of the website. It's almost the same, but not quite. If you look, they're 2 different logos. The new one needs to be kept, since it's the logo the site is currently using. - - hmwith 15:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Primeromundo (notify | contribs).
- OB by Philtower_in_Tulsa.jpg Primeromundo 17:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- CV - author asserts fair use, but there is no need to have a whole gallery of copyrighted catalog cover. One image of an inside page (which is what the article discusses) should be sufficient, and the article has this (and I haven't nominated it for deletion). — Calliopejen1 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- CV - author asserts fair use, but there is no need to have a whole gallery of copyrighted catalog cover. One image of an inside page (which is what the article discusses) should be sufficient, and the article has this (and I haven't nominated it for deletion). — Calliopejen1 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- CV - author asserts fair use, but there is no need to have a whole gallery of copyrighted catalog cover. One image of an inside page (which is what the article discusses) should be sufficient, and the article has this (and I haven't nominated it for deletion). — Calliopejen1 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- CV - author asserts fair use, but there is no need to have a whole gallery of copyrighted catalog cover. One image of an inside page (which is what the article discusses) should be sufficient, and the article has this (and I haven't nominated it for deletion). — Calliopejen1 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- CV - author asserts fair use, but there is no need to have a whole gallery of copyrighted catalog cover. One image of an inside page (which is what the article discusses) should be sufficient, and the article has this (and I haven't nominated it for deletion). — Calliopejen1 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- CV - author asserts fair use, but there is no need to have a whole gallery of copyrighted catalog cover. One image of an inside page (which is what the article discusses) should be sufficient, and the article has this (and I haven't nominated it for deletion). — Calliopejen1 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
- - uploaded by Michaelb1983 (notify | contribs).
- We can't assume the uploader meant to release it under the GFDL, although it is likely. This image was deleted by me from commons so in order to prevent further confusion (someone trying to move it again) it should be deleted from en too. Yonatan talk 18:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Philharmoni (notify | contribs).
- No attribution of sources, likely original research. — intgr 20:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Big Boss 0 (notify | contribs).
- derivative copyrighted image, no license cohesion 00:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Already checked over by admin User: Metros232 and copyright tag was correct.
- I never said it was correct as far as I can remember. Metros232 04:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- It may seem a little odd, but the logos for wikipedia are not GFDL and are actually fully copyrighted by the foundation. This means they can't be used to make derivative works without permission of the foundation, or a fair use claim. I'm not claiming it's the best solution in the world, but it is what the foundation has decided. - cohesion 03:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
