Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 March 8

< March 7	March 9 >

March 8[edit]

Image:HAHAHA!!!.JPG[edit]

Image:HAHAHA!!!.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by ANNAfoxlover (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Iamunknown 00:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse. Also appears to be a possible copyright violation since the original image may not be under GFDL.

Image:Ipodnanos.jpg[edit]

Image:Ipodnanos.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Limetolime (notify | contribs).

CV - also note this user has been previously banned for irresponsibly uploading copyrighted images both without tags and in violation of WP policies related to such — – Fʀɪɺøʟɛ _{( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs )} 01:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Salary 10266 image001.png[edit]

Image:Salary 10266 image001.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by PadreNuestro (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. -- BJBot 05:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Now that's a great pair of tits.jpg[edit]

Image:Now that's a great pair of tits.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Theresa knott (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. -- BJBot 05:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I am here to defend Theresa's tits. If Theresa wants to show her tits, I think that's ok. ~ Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 08:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm curious as to why this has been listed. The image is not used in an article but it's not a copyvio, and doesn't harm wikipedia in any way. What is the reasoning for the proposed deletion? Can we no longer have a joke with each other?Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I nominated the image here over a month ago as unencyclopedic. While not my strongest IfD nomination ever, it garnered no discussion and was deleted by User:Nv8200p on 8-February-2007. At the time I nominated the image, it was listed as being uploaded by User:SGBailey. On 7-March-2007, User:Rdsmith4 undeleted the image but left the IfD tag on it. At the time I did not review the image links, just the usage - which made it look like it was a joke image that was only used in 2 year old archived discussions. Since Theresa Knott is using the image as a link from her user page, I'm fine with keeping it. ~ BigrTex 17:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Doesn't anyone else think that this image should be renamed? It can be a little misleading...I could tell you what I expected to see when I clicked the link. Just wondering why no one has brought this up. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 00:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - It's intended to be misleading! That's what the joke is all about. The name makes much more sense if you look at the link from my userpage rather than from here (where the joke is not obvious). Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 06:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - According to Theresa's statement, we have enough evidence to support keeping this picture. --Der yck C. 07:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image kept. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 18:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2pulse.gif[edit]

Image:2pulse.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Flyingidiot (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. -- BJBot 05:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an original work, but since it's orphaned, if the owner doesn't give a statement until this nom expires, we should delete the image. --Der yck C. 07:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Basibozuk.jpg[edit]

Image:Basibozuk.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Macukali (notify | contribs).

OB by Gérôme-Black Bashi-Bazouk-c. 1869.jpg — grendel|khan 06:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:L_a69e296d5ae339d4e586f71de393d327.jpg[edit]

Image:L_a69e296d5ae339d4e586f71de393d327.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Halummms (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, AT, no source or license information -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 14:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stockxchng_internet_browsers.jpg[edit]

Image:Stockxchng_internet_browsers.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Zanimum (notify | contribs).

Lots of contradictory licence information; image contains copyrighted symbols. No use in main space and therefore no possibility to keep this as fair use. —xyzzy_n 16:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was the one who tagged it as being fair use. As the main objects are three icons; the purpose is to show the copyrighted icons and as such this can be considered derivative work of the icons. Bryan 22:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anti-IE.JPG[edit]

Image:Anti-IE.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Johntex (notify | contribs).

Derivative of previous item, same problems. —xyzzy_n 16:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this should be deleted. I am deleting it now. Thanks, Johntex\^talk 23:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WNYU_Sports.jpg[edit]

Image:WNYU_Sports.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by WNYUSports (notify | contribs).

Screwed up the upload criteria. Please delete. — — Preceding unsigned comment added by WNYUSports (talk • contribs)

Image:Peteringe.jpg[edit]

Please delete image (I am the uploader) as copyright is contested and it has not been used anyway DORMSKIRK

Speedy Delete as reqested by uploader and CI. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 00:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]