Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's sport/Assessment
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Importance scale assessment criteria missing
[edit]There is no way to asses an article's importance within this WikiProject's scope as there is no criteria list, at least not what I can find. For the quality scale assessment criteria, one is refereed to the general Wikipedia guideline on content assessment, which can be applied to all articles regardless of matter.
On that page further below it says, to my understanding, that the importance scale is instead determined by every individual WikiProject. Wikipedia:Content_assessment#Importance_assessment That is reinforced here Wikipedia:Importance
On WikiProject Women's sport/Assessment it says
"The importance parameter should be assigned according to the importance scale below."
But there is none. The link leads nowhere. How have people assessed the importance of articles under this WikiProject's scope? --Mango från yttre rymden (talk) 13:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- I just found this food for discussion: Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Priority_of_topic. There it is further reinforced that every WikiProject makes their own importance assessments relative to their subject/scope.