User talk:Conollyb

License tagging for Image:Snake man.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Snake man.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Bourke cemetery mosque.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Bourke cemetary mosque.jpg. The copy called Image:Bourke cemetary mosque.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Conollyb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

Mattinbgn\^talk 07:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Railway Station Photos

Hello - thank you for your photos of various places around New South Wales. I was wondering whether, if you come across a town with a currently functioning railway station in NSW, you might be able to help by taking a photo of the railway station? this page shows all the places wherre we need railway station photos in the country (outside of the CityRail network in Newcastle, Sydney & Wollongong) and this page shows where we need photos inside the CityRail network. Any help (even one photo) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for considering. JRG (talk) 06:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from user page

Hi - I don't know a better way to contact you on Wikipedia so here goes.. sorry to whoever if this is in the wrong place.

Just wondering if you have any proof that the building you uploaded the picture of in the cemetery in Bourke was actually a mosque? Really curious to know. Salaam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jookieapc (talk • contribs) 15:49, 11 March 2008

Hi Brian - thanks for the info. I don't suppose you have some photos of the inside of the mosque at Burke or of the sign? Interesting stuff indeed. I'm might have to go on a road trip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jookieapc (talk • contribs) 09:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source for Image:Brewarrina fish traps 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brewarrina fish traps 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Brewarrina cafe deluxe interior Feb 07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brewarrina cafe deluxe interior Feb 07.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war/BLP

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. .

Also kindly take a read of our WP:BLP policy. Nil Einne (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Matthew Johns, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I have allowed a bit of latitude but you have now crossed the line. Feel free to write what you like about Johns elsewhere but here on Wikipedia you will follow WP:BLP whatever your personal thoughts about the subject. Mattinbgn\^talk 08:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid I had to revert the material you added to Matthew Johns, for two reasons. The first was that it was very much from a particular point of view, with overly strong and emotive language, which fails to meet Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. The second was that it was taken directly, word for word, from the source - while you did reference it, exact copies from sources, when not presented as quotes, fall under the general heading of copyright violations. - Bilby (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Wentworth NSW Australia roadside art.jpg

File:Wentworth NSW Australia roadside art.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wentworth NSW Australia roadside art.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Wentworth NSW Australia roadside art.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Broken hill silver city comet.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Broken hill silver city comet.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now Commons

File:Wentwort terrain.jpg, an image uploaded to Wikipedia from this account in September 2007 (log), was transferred to commons with the new file name File:Wentworth terrain.jpg (Commons:File:Wentworth terrain.jpg) by Mattinbgn (I updated the local link I found here). — Athaenara ✉ 08:44, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silverton location map in New South Wales.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Silverton location map in New South Wales.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Silverton location map in New South Wales.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Silverton location map in New South Wales.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Silverton location map in New South Wales.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Silverton location map in New South Wales.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. An editor tries to do the right thing and improve the encyclopedia - even identifying a source for his/her modified image and instead of an explanation and/or some help, he/she gets a myriad of official, vaguely threatening templates referring to obscure rules. Well done Wikipedia!!! -- Mattinbgn (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bootie bicycle.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —JmaJeremy ✆✎ 03:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Conollyb. The reason your submission was declined is because it was blank. I've now changed the status to "draft." You should only submit the article again after you have written something. You at least need to write enough to establish the subject of article as being notable. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask on my talk page or at the teahouse. Cheers! —JmaJeremy ✆✎ 02:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Conollyb. You have new messages at Jmajeremy's talk page.
Message added 14:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—JmaJeremy ✆✎ 14:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Conollyb. You have new messages at Jmajeremy's talk page.
Message added 14:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—JmaJeremy ✆✎ 14:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bootie bicycle.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 01:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bootie bicycle.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Bootie bicycle

Hello, Conollyb. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bootie bicycle.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I have taken the content you added for this article and merged it with the existing one at Bootie (bicycle), which is now greatly expanded. Thanks for helping to improve Wikipedia! --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bourke bowls.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Conollyb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Conollyb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]