User talk:Joey80

This user may have left Wikipedia. Joey80 has not edited Wikipedia since February 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Joey80! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 13 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 711 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tolgahan Sayisman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ninibeth Leal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Corine Rottschäfer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mirta Massa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ilma Urrutia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ernesto Calzadilla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rajeev Singh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Karina Berger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brett Wilson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jason Erceg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Albe Geldenhuys 12. Thomas Sasse 13. Ignacio Kliche

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masterpieces of Intangible Heritage.png

Hi, you have updated this map in 2009, however I see a total mixup of the Baltic states. Estonia should be valued 3, Lithuania 2 and Latvia 1. It would be great if you could fix that. Thanks. --H2ppyme (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's because I didn't update the map. It is as of 2005, when the list is as of 2009. Maybe you could ask the editor who updated the list for 2009 to also do the same for the map. Joey80 (talk) 00:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Globe International

I have nominated Miss Globe International, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Globe International. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Angel Clinton (talk) 05:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me how you can make a map like the one in Miss Universe? Thanks

Speedy deletion of Template:Pritzker Prize Winners 1979-2000

A tag has been placed on Template:Pritzker Prize Winners 1979-2000 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Elekhh (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miss International Pageant Map.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Miss International Pageant Map.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Globe Organisation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Globe Organisation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Globe Organisation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E4024 (talk) 20:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox World Heritage Site

Template:Infobox World Heritage Site has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Miss Universe editions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Miss Universe editions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss Universe editions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 08:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Miss World hosts and invited artists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Miss World hosts and invited artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss World hosts and invited artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 16:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Memory of the World Programme logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Memory of the World Programme logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucia Liptáková

The article Lucia Liptáková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristina Slavinskaya

The article Kristina Slavinskaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jennifer Schooler

The article Jennifer Schooler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maricar Balagtas

The article Maricar Balagtas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joan Chópite

The article Joan Chópite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karin Laasmäe

The article Karin Laasmäe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minna Mäki-Kala

The article Minna Mäki-Kala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skye-Jilly Edwards

The article Skye-Jilly Edwards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yormery Ortega

The article Yormery Ortega has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karina Berger

The article Karina Berger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yajaira Vera

The article Yajaira Vera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Sasse

The article Thomas Sasse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Albe Geldenhuys

The article Albe Geldenhuys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Erceg

The article Jason Erceg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Eriksén

The article Peter Eriksén has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ernesto Calzadilla

The article Ernesto Calzadilla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brett Wilson (model)

The article Brett Wilson (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rajeev Singh

The article Rajeev Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tolgahan Sayışman

The article Tolgahan Sayışman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Miss Universe hosts and invited artists listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Miss Universe hosts and invited artists. Since you had some involvement with the List of Miss Universe hosts and invited artists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss Universe Organization

Template:Miss Universe Organization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christie Claridge

The article Christie Claridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NMODEL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]