Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/California State Capitol

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2019 at 14:42:08 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – It's an OK 2014 pic. of a building, but I don't see anything really first-class about it. Meh. Sca (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, I'm not sure how this could be improved, it looks very high quality and great EV. Mattximus (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment looks over-exposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I don't think it's overexposed — that would have blown out the sky and/or the details on the bride's dress. Good EV, high-quality capture, nice slice-of-life details. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geoffroi (talk) 01:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support - Seems like a pretty good capture. I rather like the light for a straight-forward shot of this kind of subject. Nothing fancy, but we don't need fancy. Weak support because there's purple chromatic aberration in the trees that should be fixed. Weak support rather than neutral because it's not on the main subject and I feel like enwiki's FPC should be less pixel-peepery than Commons :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:18, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Rhododendrites. MER-C 17:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 12:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sacramento,-California---State-Capitol.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:44, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]