Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg

Hooded Pitta

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 09:43:03 (UTC)

Reason: Another colourful Pitta. I got seriously lucky with some of these a while back. High quality, sharp image. The two second exposure is mostly a fluke!
Articles in which this image appears: Hooded Pitta
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, another beauty pageant contestant (although I wonder why modern cameras still can't entirely focus on small objects like these). Brandmeister^talk 09:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because physics. Going off the exif data and this calculator at f/4 with a 500mm focal length and the subject 6.47m away with JJ's camera there's 2.84cm of depth of field--which is smaller than the bird is. Cowtowner (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming a perfectly spherical bird in a vacuum... J Milburn (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Someone, somewhere has probably decided that's animal cruelty, but I'd be curious to see one anyways. Cowtowner (talk) 23:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Cowtowner (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 15:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support　Two second exposure time! Maybe this bird was waiting for you ✿ --Laitche (talk) 16:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eternal Support for two-second exposure – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 06:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as above. J Milburn (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 18:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Two second exposure?? A fluke but also a bit of an accident, surely? Completely inappropriate shutter speed/ISO. :) I'm shocked that you didn't get any blur. Even if you used mirror lock up, there must be some sort of vibration (wind, etc) in two seconds...? Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- My newish tripod is pretty rock solid (gitzo GT-5532LS). I broke the old one. But for this shot I was dealing with a broken (read: wobbling) tripod head. Sharp shots around 1/15th were proving difficult. Since the bird was sitting extremely still for a few seconds at a time I tried a longer exposure with a remote release and live view to avoid mirror slap. A two second shot can have less blur because there is time for vibration to die out. Eventually I'll get a new gimbal, when I can afford it. Since then I've made makeshift repairs. JJ Harrison (talk) 03:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Indefatigable2 (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]