Catley v Herbert
| Catley v Herbert | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Catley v Herbert |
| Decided | 14 August 1988 |
| Citation | [1988] 1 NZLR 606 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Richardson, Somers and Hardie Boys JJ |
Catley v Herbert [1988] 1 NZLR 606 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether a contract illegal under law, can be subsequently validated under the Illegal Contracts Act 1970.[1]
Background
[edit] |
Catley and Herbert were joint shareholders in a company, and had agreed that Herbert would buy out Catley's shares. This sale entailed the selling of some of the company property in order to purchase his shares. The law saw this as financing the purchase of a company's own shares, which was illegal under section 62 of the Companies Act 1950.
As a result, Herbert refused to pay Catley, on the basis that to do so would be illegal. Catley sought validation of the contract in the court.
Held
[edit]Validation of the contract was ordered.
Footnote: This case is often discussed with NZI Bank Ltd v Euro-National Corp Ltd [1992] 3 NZLR 528, where a similar transaction that also contravened section 62(1) was not validated
References
[edit]- ^ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. [page needed]. ISBN 0-86472-555-8.
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |