Draft:Insuphishient

Submission declined on 26 September 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by KylieTastic 2 seconds ago. Last edited by KylieTastic 2 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Insuphishient is a podcast that explores the world of the jam band Phish. Known for its humorous and irreverent take on Phish’s music, culture, and fandom, the podcast is hosted by Matt Crothers and Nick Meekins. The show dives into Phish’s extensive discography, live performances, and quirky traditions, as well as playful, offbeat topics related to the band.

Format

Insuphishient takes a freeform approach to its 500-episode run, with each episode assigned a number and covering a different angle on the band. The podcast avoids chronological or numerical order, opting for spontaneity. Fans can expect a mix of deep Phish insights and absurd humor, covering everything from famous moments in Phish history to quirky fan theories and trivia.

Topics

The podcast covers a wide range of Phish-related topics. Episodes explore individual songs, iconic live performances, and deep cuts from the band’s career. The hosts often delve into fan culture and Phish’s trademark improvisational style, adding comedic twists to otherwise serious analysis.

Hosts

Matt Crothers and Nick Meekins, both passionate Phish fans, bring their unique perspectives to the podcast. Their lighthearted and comedic style helps make Insuphishient accessible to both die-hard Phish fans and newcomers alike. The chemistry between the two hosts keeps the show engaging, with Matt’s deep knowledge of the band’s history and Nick’s playful personality adding balance to each episode.

Reception

The podcast has developed a cult following within the Phish fan community. Its balance of humor and genuine appreciation for Phish’s music has resonated with listeners, setting it apart from more conventional Phish-related media.

References