Jump to content

Draft:Swat.wiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Swat Wiki
Type of site
Pastebin
Available inEnglish
Founder(s)Peer, Dave
CommercialNo
RegistrationOptional
Users30,000+
Current statusActive
Written inNextJS

Swat Wiki is a pastebin-style platform used primarily for sharing and leaking personal information (often referred to as doxing) of individuals.

Operators

[edit]

The operators behind Swat Wiki remain anonymous, promoting a platform where users can upload and access doxed information. In 2024, the platform's administrators stated that it was created as a space for those who seek to publish and view personal details of individuals without censorship. Despite the controversial nature, they maintain that swat.wiki is simply a tool and does not actively promote harassment.

Legality

[edit]

Swat Wiki's terms of service claim that the platform does not allow the posting of illegal content such as threats of physical violence, child-related information, or explicit content involving minors. However, the platform openly hosts and shares personal information of individuals without consent, which raises significant legal and ethical concerns.

According to the privacy policy, Swat Wiki asserts compliance with Section 230 of the United States Communications Decency Act, claiming legal immunity as a host for user-generated content. The platform states that it does not verify the legality of posted material, placing responsibility on the users.

Swat Wiki Community

[edit]

Swat Wiki has attracted a community interested in accessing and sharing sensitive information. The platform has become a hub for doxing activities, where users can exchange information and discuss methods for gathering and publishing personal data. The moderators of swat.wiki take a hands-off approach, allowing users to post freely within the platform’s loose guidelines.

Criticism and Controversy

[edit]

Swat Wiki has faced criticism for its role in facilitating harassment and privacy violations. Critics argue that the platform's hands-off approach encourages malicious behavior, while legal experts highlight the potential legal liabilities despite its claim of immunity under Section 230. Advocacy groups have called for stricter regulation and monitoring of such platforms to prevent abuse and protect individuals' privacy.

References

[edit]

Category:Internet privacy Category:Cyberstalking Category:Controversial websites