Draft:YellowfinBI
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 988 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 26 August 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 8 September 2023 by Stuartyeates (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Stuartyeates 13 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 13 July 2023 by Artem.G (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Artem.G 15 months ago. |
Submission declined on 19 June 2023 by Rich Smith (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Rich Smith 16 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 16 June 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 16 months ago. |
- Comment: I was asked by email to look at this again. I can't access some sources due to "disable your adblocker" messages but everything else is articles that quote company officers. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources are not even close. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: No reliable sources. The ones given are either PR fluff or trivial reporting - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Yellowfin is a Business Intelligence Software company specializing in Embedded Analytics solutions headquartered in Austin, Texas. It has been part of Idera, Inc. since January 2022.[1][2]
History
[edit]Yellowfin was founded in 2003 in Melbourne, Australia, by Glen Rabie as CEO and Justin Hewitt as COO.
In 2014 Yellowfin supplied the embedded business analytics software behind BMC Software’s Remedy Smart Reporting ITSM solution.[1]
In 2016 Yellowfin partnered with Lunit subsidiary Volpara Health to improve breast cancer screening. [3]
In 2017 Yellowfin partnered with global shipping and mailing company Pitney Bowes to deliver a Visual Insights and business intelligence tool for Pitney Bowes customers.[4][5]
In 2022 Yellowfin was acquired by private software company Idera, Inc..[1][2]
Platform
[edit]Yellowfin BI is a Business Intelligence Platform built on a scalable Java core with JavaScript UX. Yellowfin works with data in existing sources, including JDBC compliant databases such as SQLServer, Oracle, Exasol, Snowflake, Redshift, XML/A compliant cubes such as Microsoft Analysis Services, SAP BW, Oracle Essbase, CSV files (which are then loaded in to a relational database), and third-party sources including applications like Salesforce.com and Google Analytics.
Audience
[edit]The Yellowfin platform supports enterprise analytics and embedded analytics with a primary focus on Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs): Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) and Software as a Service (SaaS) application providers that want to embed dashboard and reporting capabilities into their products.
Official Website
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Avidon, Eric (31 Jan 2022). "Yellowfin acquired by B2B software specialist Idera". TechTarget.
- ^ a b Dee, Katie (February 1, 2022). "SD Times news digest: Idera acquires Yellowfin; Fastly launches Fastly Academy; Jellyfish raises $71 million in Series C". SD Times.
- ^ "Using Cloud technology to improve breast cancer detection". Microsoft News. May 12, 2016.
- ^ "Pitney Bowes and Yellowfin to Jointly Develop Visual Insights". Yahoo Finance. March 8, 2017.
- ^ "Yellowfin Partners with Pitney Bowes". Database Trends and Applications. March 7, 2017.
- Draft articles on software
- Draft articles on computing
- Draft articles on technology
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/9 days ago
- AfC submissions by date/28 October 2024
- AfC submissions by date/26 August 2024
- AfC submissions by date/16 July 2023
- AfC submissions by date/09 July 2023
- AfC submissions by date/19 June 2023
- AfC submissions by date/15 June 2023
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.