This page is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Excludeas person for started this entry. The act is symbolic with little actual impact, given that Kaliningrad is not governed by Poland, but by Russia. Carter00000 (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The act is symbolic, I certainly agree with this statement. However, the Kaliningrad issue has come at a time of hightened tensions between the West (especially Poland) and Russia so given the context I would say this is notable enough to belong here. I mean, what's the point of having a category for international relations if we don't have anything there? It has been reported on by the BBC, The Guardian, Voice of America and Associated Press. It's clearly a notable current event, symbolic or not. GWA88 (talk) 12:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Upon reading your justification and reviewing the articles you have sourced in the entry in more detail, I've re-added the entry, with the wording being more aligned with the first source. Please let me know if you have any comments on the wording. Carter00000 (talk) 14:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
