This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
The notice that there is good material to translate from another language is even less important for the general reader than the stub tag. Therefore it belongs below the stub tag. Otherwise it looks like there is something wrong with the article, which is not what this notification means. Also, a placement at the top hinders the general reader from accessing the actual content of the article. --Ettrig (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The only purpose of that notice is to draw attention of users, and to induce someone to expand the article with translated material from French Wikipedia. Therefore, it is desirable to have the notice at the top, where it can be easily spotted. But, if you are so keen to see it moved to the bottom of the article, so be it. I don't have any desire to start a talk page discussion over this... I hope that someone will soon translate the material from French Wikipedia and expand the article. Afterwards, we can remove the notice for good. --Sundostund (talk) 18:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We are many editors in Wikipedia. All of us have our own views on priorities. And we all do what we think is the best combination of pleasure and value. This tag is a notification from one user to other users about what they should do. Very seldom does it work that way. As I said. The other editors have their own views on what thay should do. So the value of this tag is very limited, although not nil. Check some tagged articles, and you will find that many of the tags are very old. So we should not let this tag make the articles ugly and less readable. --Ettrig (talk) 18:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]