Talk:1859 in the United Kingdom

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1859 in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817165102/http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/icons-timeline/1840-1860 to http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/icons-timeline/1840-1860

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

@Camboxer: per WP:DOYCITE and WP:V, please provide a citation for the assertion you have added. Since 2017, we have required year-based and date-based articles to conform with the verifiability policy. It is a simple thing. The article has a source, copy it into this article. Elizium23 (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I have located a citation, which required some work, because no citation was in the source article at all so I don't want to hear from people that Wikipedia articles are a reliable source for WP:DOYCITE compliance. Elizium23 (talk) 13:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DOYCITE applies to Days of the Year articles. This is not a Days of the Year article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Camboxer (talk • contribs) 07:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, excuse me then! Please go on to violate WP:V anywhere but days of the year articles! But pleased to read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year/Archive 13 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#RFC: remove all uncited information. I will continue to request citations and I will continue to find out where editors like you are playing with unverified information. Elizium23 (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]