Talk:1952 Swiss Mount Everest expedition

Climbing Mid‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article name

This probably should be renamed to 1952 Swiss Mount Everest Expedition to follow the naming conventions used for 1924 British Mount Everest Expedition. There is a complication for this article because there were two Swiss expeditions in 1952; in the spring and fall (northern hemisphere). I suggest that both be put into the one article although perhaps the article title should be ... Expeditions in that case. RedWolf (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.sfar-evev06.ch/en/expeditions/everest52f.html
- In 1952 Swiss Mount Everest Expedition on 2011-05-25 03:29:30, 404 Not Found
- In 1952 Swiss Mount Everest Expedition on 2011-06-04 17:47:59, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:48, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archive URL added. RedWolf (talk) 18:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surely there were 2 Swiss expeditions in 1952, in spring and autumn, with both of them Tenzing and Lambert got high up. PatGallacher (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1952 Swiss Mount Everest expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070414143647/http://imagingeverest.rgs.org/Concepts/Virtual_Everest/-116.html to http://imagingeverest.rgs.org/Concepts/Virtual_Everest/-116.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad wikilinks

Whenever a wikilink turns RED, as in 1956_Swiss_Everest–Lhotse_expedition, this means that something has gone seriously wrong, and this is unacceptable. It must be corrected. This means that there is either a typographical error in the link, or the article does not exist at all. There is no purpose in allowing red wikilinks to exist, and they should be eliminated. 24.156.78.205 (talk) 18:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What you're saying is contrary to accepted practice on Wikipedia. Redlinks should be rare, but they may legitimately exist in certain circumstances, such as when a clearly notable topic has no article or a new article is pending. The guideline is here, if you'd like to read it. Incidentally, I left a note on your talk page, but please stop "correcting" other users' comments on talk pages. I have reverted you here and elsewhere because you've been doing that. Edit articles; leave existing talk-page comments alone. Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 20:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim

I just noticed the unsourced claim, flagged as "dubious" in Nov 2018, that "The team never even considered an attempt at an ascent of Everest", after someone added similar words to the South Col article. This unreferenced claim flies in the face of the description of Lambert and Tenzing trying to reach the summit, as well as Edmund Hillary's account of the Swiss Expedition when he talks about meeting them at their base camp and how disappointed they were at having failed to reach the summit. Furthermore, the South Col is part of Mount Everest, as is the Southeast ridge that they went up, so it makes no sense to say they weren't ascending Everest. So I am removing the sentence from this and the related articles Edouard Wyss-Dunant and South Col. Samatarou (talk) 01:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autumn expedition?

The last section of this article mentions an Autumn expedition, but I don't think there was one. I think the editor who added this section was confusing the failed push by the second team who were going to attempt a summit, but after 4 days on the south col of bad weather called it quits. This section mentions that this autumn expedition had some of the same members of the first, which seems highly unlikely after 2 months these men would return. Thoughts? StarHOG (Talk) 13:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, there definitely was an autumn expedition, see "Tiger of the Snows" by Ullman and Tenzing for an account of it. PatGallacher (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]