Jump to content

Talk:1964 Illinois House of Representatives election/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Theleekycauldron (talk · contribs) 08:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there! I'll be taking this up :) I can't offer a firm timeline as to when to expect comments, so feel free to request a new reviewer at any time. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Sourcing

[edit]
  • It'd probably be better to rework the text to not have to rely on Chamberlain as a source.
    • I've replaced it for the sentence where it's the only source. As for the other two places it's cited, the first is to give someone a reference to the relevant part of the constitution (as a useful primary source), and the second is to determine the incumbency status of candidates. I don't see either use as problematic. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • did not appoint former governor Stratton, the architect of this redistricting process I'd probably call that OR given the source.
  • Two lawsuits were decided by the Supreme Court on January 4, 1964 don't see in source
  • Page numbers on Green 1987?

Breadth questions

[edit]

Overall

[edit]

@Elli: Fantastic job on the expansion! Prose and breadth look great; I'm going to make some sourcing spot-checks and hopefully I can get this done today. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Elli: Awesome, thank you so much :) Elli (talk | contribs) 23:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Elli: you won't believe this, but that's... all from me? I've made a bunch of fixes in-article and left some other stuff here. Once it's straightened out, you're good to go :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great :) I'll work on addressing your remaining feedback today. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: can you take a look now? I've addressed almost everything here. As for the things that I haven't: I don't have much of an opinion on whether the members of the commission should be in prose or as a list, but I don't know how best to present them as a list, so I've left them as prose. Also not sure what a more rigorous endorsements section would look like as listing them like we do on most election pages would be a huge mess. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and we are... done! very nice job :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.