Jump to content

Talk:1996 Oman cyclone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1996 Oman cyclone has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star1996 Oman cyclone is part of the 1996 North Indian Ocean cyclone season series, a good topic. It is also part of the Arabian Peninsula tropical cyclones series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2015Good article nomineeListed
May 18, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
May 15, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 30, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a cyclone caused historic flooding in Yemen in 1996?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1996 Oman cyclone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricanehink! I will be reviewing this article tonight. Overall, I think it is pretty nice. After reading through the article, I believe I have only three issues with passing it.

  • "The World Bank assisted in a project to rebuilt the damaged infrastructure in Yemen" - "rebuilt" ---> "rebuild"
  • On reference #3, "line feed character in |title= at position 43"
  • Why no page number(s) for reference #4?

That should be it.--12george1 (talk) 02:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks @12george1:! I believe these issues should be addressed now. As for IMD and page number, I'm just proving the IMD did not designate the system as a depression or stronger in their annual report, so there wouldn't be a page number. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1996 Oman cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]