Talk:2002 Pacific typhoon season

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oceania Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Oceania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceaniaWikipedia:WikiProject OceaniaTemplate:WikiProject OceaniaOceania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oceans Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

2002 Pacific typhoon season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

2002 Pacific typhoon season is the main article in the 2002 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 6, 2015.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 24, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
January 4, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted
September 29, 2014	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Other basin talkpages (2002): Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere

Todo[edit]

It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kammuri needs to be summarized a lot now that it has its own article. íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 02:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1]
[2]

Copyediting[edit]

The first sentence is real clunky, particularly the part before the semi-colon. The rest of the article needs copyediting as well. Booharv (talk) 02:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://web.kma.go.kr/eng/wea/wea_03_01.jsp
- In 1950–56 Pacific typhoon seasons on 2011-05-25 03:26:39, 404 Not Found
- In 1973 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 04:34:38, 404 Not Found
- In 1987 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 05:39:58, 404 Not Found
- In 1999 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 06:42:41, 404 Not Found
- In 2004 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 07:47:05, 404 Not Found
- In 2006 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-26 02:11:40, 404 Not Found
- In 2007 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-27 15:15:42, 404 Not Found
- In 1950–56 Pacific typhoon seasons on 2011-06-04 17:33:47, 404 Not Found
- In 1959 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-04 18:45:09, 404 Not Found
- In 1957 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-04 20:07:59, 404 Not Found
- In 1959 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-04 21:56:49, 404 Not Found
- In 1964 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 13:01:20, 404 Not Found
- In 1969 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 14:19:18, 404 Not Found
- In 1973 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 15:44:21, 404 Not Found
- In 1973 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 20:35:03, 404 Not Found
- In 1977 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 21:57:12, 404 Not Found
- In 1978 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 00:33:49, 404 Not Found
- In 1980 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 01:47:46, 404 Not Found
- In 1982 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 03:03:12, 404 Not Found
- In 1984 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 04:04:13, 404 Not Found
- In 1985 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 11:48:57, 404 Not Found
- In 1990 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 23:58:35, 404 Not Found
- In 1992 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-08 01:39:20, 404 Not Found
- In 1995 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-08 03:16:18, 404 Not Found
- In 1999 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-08 23:40:04, 404 Not Found
- In 2000 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-10 05:44:57, 404 Not Found
- In 2001 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-10 07:40:29, 404 Not Found
- In 2002 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 04:45:07, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.okinawatimes.co.jp/eng/20020907.html
- In 2002 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 07:23:44, 404 Not Found
- In 2002 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 04:45:16, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 Pacific typhoon season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 00:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per IRC, I am reviewing this article. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd retitle the season summary to season summary and predictions to be like most recent ATL storms. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OK. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"On March 6, meteorologists from University College London at TropicalStormRisk.com issued a forecast for the season, indicating the potential for average activity due to sea surface temperatures expected to be slightly warmer than usual" "due to" sounds weird here, I suggest changing it to "since". YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree - "since" doesn't have the same conjunctional properties as "due to". --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"In storm information below, wind-speed advisories differ from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) to the JMA as the JTWC uses the United States criteria of 1-minute mean to designate maximum sustained winds, while the JMA uses the 10-minute mean wind criteria to designate tropical cyclone maximum sustained winds. This difference generally results in JTWC maximum winds appearing higher than the maximum winds described by the JMA for the same cyclone. Most of the 31 cyclones that developed this year either remained out at sea or were weak at landfall." source? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The source is the summaries themselves. How could I cite that most storms remained at sea. Only Guam got struck by a strong typhoon. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - The BT. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - The BT doesn't list every landfall though. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:59, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Bad JMA. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 01:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"the typhoon continued to intensify, reaching peak winds of 175 km/h (110 mph) 10 minute sustained) on March 5.[8]" who do you mention this here and not Tapah's section. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tapah was short-lived and didn't have a significant difference in the wind speeds. I'm assuming you meant why, and not who. If you mean who, technically we shouldn't have to, since JMA is the official warning center, so officially the storm's peak was whatever they said. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The JTWC estimated peak winds of 260 km/h (160 mph 1 minute sustained)" see above. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See above. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The JTWC estimated peak winds of 260 km/h (160 mph 1 minute sustained) while the storm was located about 610 km (380 mi) east of Catanduanes in the Philippines; this made Mitag a super tyhoon, the first one on record in the month of March" Wow, big sentence. Could you break it up. Thanks. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't that big, it has a semicolon. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any other impact for Mitag? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- It has a sub-article, so I opted not to go into too much detail. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
also, why don't you put the death for Mitag in in the middle and not the end? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I did it mostly chronologically. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
any other impact for Caloy. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not that I could find. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"after which the eye began weakening.[24]" how can an eye weaken? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Its shape deteriorates and loses definition. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The developing storm dropped rainfall on Guam that ended the island's wildfire season.[25] " why is this in mid-section
- I don't get your question. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - - You do because you replied to similar comments. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd expand Chataan and Rusa section's more, they were the worst storms of the season. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- They have sub-articles, and I tried to keep the overall length of the article manageable. I kept the most important info on them. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The storm disrupted relief efforts from Chataan, causing additional power outages but little damage.[46]" why is there impact in the MH part of the section???? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
" On July 18, the typhoon reached its peak intensity of 185 km/h (115 mph 10 minute winds), according to the JMA, making it the strongest storm of the season. The JTWC estimated peak winds of 270 km/h (165 mph 1 minute winds)," We already know this. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How? I don't get your comment. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - You replied to this above, so you don't have to worry about this comment. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Across Japan, the typhoon dropped torrential rainfall peaking at 902 mm (35.5 in) in Tokushima Prefecture.[86]" plz move this to the end of the paragraph. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"On September 4, the typhoon's eye crossed over Okinawa.[9] It dropped heavy rainfall and produced strong winds that left over 100,000 people without power.[93] Damage on the island was estimated at $14.3 million.[94][nb 5] Sinlaku left about $3.6 million in damage to Kadena Air Base on Okinawa.[9]" I think you know what needs to be done here, but I am starting to think you did it for a reason. Please explain why above. Thank you. FYI, you don't do this in Higos's section. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not every storm section needs to have a MH paragraph and an impact paragraph. If a storm lasts for a while, and it impacts several areas, it's better to mention the impact when you mention the area it hits. As for Higos, its impact only happened where it made landfall, so the separate impact paragraph makes sense. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
" The JMA estimated peak winds of 150 km/h (90 mph 10 minute sustained),[8] and the JTWC estimated peak winds of 215 km/h (135 mph 1 minute sustained).[9] " no eed for 10 and 1 min sustaine dIMO as they are mentioned earlier. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane
- I mention it every time. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An area of thunderstorms increased near the FSM on September 15 within the monsoon trough." FSM? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's mentioned several times. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Late on November 24, it weakened below typhoon status, and early on November 25 Haishen became extratropical." comma after 25. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Does it need one? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why aren't the places listed in the SE chart are not linked and the storms are? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't get your question, sorry. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - WP:Overlink is why.Jason Rees (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yea, but the storms are linked and the places (which are not major for the most part. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - I removed the only place that still had a link, for consistency. I link the storms, as they are also linked in the storm names section, but didn't link the locations per WP:OVERLINK. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:59, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The following table does not include unnamed storms, and PAGASA names are in parenthesis. Storms entering from the Central Pacific only include their information while in the western Pacific, and are noted with an asterisk *." source? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- For what? I included what I did in the season summary. How can I cite that I used an asterisk? <ref>{{cite web|author=User:Hurricanehink}}</ref> :P --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the length of the article, this article is decent. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 01:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Congratulations to all the contributors to this featured article. You deserve a lot of applause, recognition and appreciation. What a wonderful article.

Bfpage |leave a message 14:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2002 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://weather.cityu.edu.hk/tc_forecast/2002_forecast_APR.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://weather.cityu.edu.hk/tc_forecast/2002_Verification.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pongsona image[edit]

This is just a question, and I don't want to start a huge debate. Why is Pongsona's image a picture of the storm after peak intensity instead of the picture shown in the article at peak intensity? HurricaneGonzalo | Talk | Contribs 12:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why, but I've put the peak one there now. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 16:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2002 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2002 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon 0209 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Typhoon 0209. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. B dash (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]