Talk:2008–09 Serie D

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Italian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Fifth Column for Each Division

I have edited Girone A, adding a fifth column which shows where the team played the previous year. ECC means it played in Eccellenza in 2007-08 and so on, while a blank space means it played in Serie D last year. I would appreciate it if you gave it some thought and posted your comments here. I will not edit the other eight divisions and would appreciate that Girone A not be reverted to its original form until the matter is discussed here. In my opinion, the additional column provides valid information and my only concern is that doing this to all nine divisions may make the display too wide. Juve2000 (talk) 03:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any Reliable Sources?

I am bothered that all the information presented here is not sourced, especially the information about points deductions. I checked the official Serie D website from the main Serie D article, but found it to be completely useless for finding the standings for this season. Can anyone find a source for the standings and information here? Rougue1987 (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can try this for standings and results -->http://www.speciali.raisport.rai.it/calcio/seried/index.shtml, however, I don't think they state why certain teams were penalized. I don't think the penalties are even marked, but they are deducted from the point total. Juve2000 (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. We should add a references list to this article and post this link in that section. Rougue1987 (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]