This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
There is some evidence that this is not a non-free issue, per the College Hockey Task force guidelines, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/College Ice Hockey task force/Guidelines, where it says: " Feel free to upload ice hockey team logos for any schools/team's article/infobox. Vector is preferred over raster images, however, when vector is not available, use raster instead. " The problems with this guidance are: 1)Is this valid guidance?, 2)Assuming there is/was license to use school/team logo's, this note is 8 years old, and ensuing Wikipedia policy may have significantly compromised the guideline, and 3) if the guideline conflicts with the non-free policy, the guideline should be changed/deleted. Nonetheless, in lieu of specific information regarding the validity of the guideline, I think it's OK to keep the logo. Bill McKenna (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
I was directed to this article as it was on the unassessed list since 2013. Re: importance, I am conflicted, as D-III hockey season articles are discouraged, but RIT did win the D-III Frozen Four that year, and in the subsequent year moved to D-I. I'm going to rate it as 'low' to be conservative, as it was an exceptional season. Re: Quality, the article is very incomplete and is poorly linked. I'll rate it as 'stub' with a clean-up and expansion recommended. Bill McKenna (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]