Talk:2012 AFC Challenge Cup qualification

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football box scores

So the unspaced endashes in the scores are being enforced in this article. OK, it's MoS, but the users who are enforcing it haven't done so in previous football articles they've contributed to and are not doing so by changing other articles that need changing. I don't want to make too much fuss about this especially since this is considered a dead issue. But that's part of the point, a dead issue which the discussion took place over a year ago and nothing has changed. Therefore, can we not keep the spaced endashes in the football box templates to continue to be inline with other football articles? And yes, I do prefer the spaced version. Banana Fingers (talk) 18:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ENDASH is clear. There are no exceptions, since reapplying mistakes in other articles is not within WP:IAR. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 11:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the related discussion at Template talk:Football box#WP:ENDASH where every claim to use spaced endashes had been decisively debunked. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 11:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why all of a sudden now though? You were there at the Suzuki Cup article yet no enforcement. Yes I've already read through that entire discussion before. But like I said, nothing has changed since that discussion from over a year. Most notably the 2010 World Cup page... it's spaced. Banana Fingers (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to try first here. There should be at least a million pages where footballbox is used, changing them will take a century. If you want, you can do that there (Suzuki Cup page), or I can bring this up at WT:MOS and I probably know how it'll turn out: spaced endashes are contrary to MOS.

There's nothing wrong in following MOS, and there are a plenty of wrongs committed in not following MOS w/ no good reason. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've already left a message at MoS regarding this a few days ago but no response. Maybe it's because of where I've put the message. lol Banana Fingers (talk) 11:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try putting it on a separate section and place it at the bottom. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 11:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See, told ya I knew how this would turn out. A million wrongs doesn't make a right. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 03:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2012 AFC Challenge Cup qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]