Talk:2024 Indian Premier League/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 11:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 09:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Expect initial remarks in 24-48 hours. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Before I start reviewing, I see that you are only the 7th biggest contributor, with less than 10% authorship, and nothing on the article talk page about you nom-ing it, which isn't good. Remember for next time you are nom-ing something for GA.
Statistics and Awards
[edit]- All good (though can make the Most Boundaries heading only have line- Total Sixes- 2174, instead of newline, and similiar for fours)(not necessary for GA, will just make it look better)
- @DoctorWhoFan91: How about the format used on this page? Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Umm, no. Shudders. Even leaving it as is would be better than this format. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Playoffs
[edit]- Add sources for the "qualified for the final for the nth time"? (I'll have to check though if the statement might not be WP:OR) Done
Lead
[edit]- Add '.' between "League" and "The tournament"
- Mention that Chennai is starting and ending venue bcs they won last year
- Done
Background
[edit]- Clarify that 2008 was also the first edition
- Format- CE first sentence, weirdly worded, and explain how the "change in group order was done"- randomly, or by some rule?
- mention the playoff is a type of Page playoff system
- Schedule- Mention the election and the possibility of being held abroad, before the confirmation it'll be held at home
- Mention due to being last year's winners for Chennai again
- Expand marketing.
- Expand broadcasting
- All done, except Marketing & Broadcasting - because, they have literally nothing else to be expanded with... Which is why instead of their own separate section, they are kept as sub-sections. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Broadcasting- mention that's it's second year of the deal of this many $, after viewership etc levels last year? And for Marketing- other brands must have advertised too, and even the sponsors would have put out advertisements? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there aren't enough WP:RS covering those, I will add what I can find. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @DoctorWhoFan91 I have added, what I could find with sources. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Will check, bit busy. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @DoctorWhoFan91 I have added, what I could find with sources. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there aren't enough WP:RS covering those, I will add what I can find. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Teams
[edit]- Add comma between returned and with Done
Opening ceremony
[edit]- remove "the" before Chennai Super Kings
- told:
stated
- First Nigam sang, then all three, then Rahmnan? Bcs kind of confusing. Also maybe hit in hit song should be quoted?
- Was this it? Is it possible to extend?
League stage
[edit]This is a big list, so I'm gonna changes by problem instead of listing individual cases.
- Are records for fours and sixes really necessary in a summary? Either by a player or in a match?
- Are records in a team really necessary most of the time? (as an example- Head's fastest fifty for SRH)
- Are records for a team really necessary? Does it matter that it was the lowest or highest-scoring powerplay and stuff?
- The last SRH qualified is not referenced.
- This is not necessary for a GA, but would make the article better- are there more details for those matches which just mention who won the match? Like I know every match doesn't make records, but is there really nothing to say regarding them?
References
[edit]That's a lot of references, many of which are unreliable as a whole, but are fine enough for cricket though. I'll ask about ones which don't seem right(based on this version)
- Ref-5: Mention ICC as publisher
- Ref-17: is socialsamosa reliable?
- Use publisher name, not websites where possible
- Ref-23 has a CS1 error
- Ref-32 has error
- Per WP:CONSISTENT, wikilink all or none of the publisher names
- Is LatestLY reliable?
- Ref-171 is a tweet?
- Ref 168, 169- Is OneCricket or Cricket.com reliable?
Images
[edit]Just to make sure, that's the extent of free images available? (Like maybe Orange and Purple Cap holders and MVP?)
Overall
[edit]Will review the rest of the article later, Vestrian24Bio. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Review finished, will do spot-check and pass article when all issues are resolved. Good luck, Vestrian24Bio. 19:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |