Talk:212 (song)
Appearance
212 (song) is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by 750h+ at 09:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: 2011 single by Azealia Banks featuring Lazy Jay |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 212 (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:212 (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 09:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 15:30, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
Best, Heartfox (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Heartfox: thoughts now? 750h+ 07:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- B-Class song articles
- B-Class Hip hop articles
- Low-importance Hip hop articles
- WikiProject Hip hop articles
- B-Class Women in hip hop music articles
- Low-importance Women in hip hop music articles
- WikiProject Women in hip hop music articles
- B-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles