Talk:21 (Adele album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 21 (Adele album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

21 (Adele album) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 3, 2011	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
February 4, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Former featured article candidate

Adele Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Adele, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Adele on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AdeleWikipedia:WikiProject AdeleTemplate:WikiProject AdeleAdele articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Top‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music High‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[RIAA certification#RIAA Diamond certifications as of 5 October 2012|Diamond]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Uk sales figues

The OCC figures in the link you provide are for 5.29 million not 6 million 148.252.133.215 (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of Writing

Badly written/meaning unclear: “Composed in the aftermath of the singer's separation from her then partner, the album typifies the near dormant tradition of the confessional singer-songwriter in its exploration of heartbreak, introspection, and forgiveness.” 2A02:C7E:2D44:D500:14FF:1F35:EC59:D2FF (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Crouch, Swale (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21 (Adele album) → 21 (album) – There are only three articles for albums with this title. Given Pageviews and WP:PDAB this is the clear primary album of this title.

"The main question about PDABs is whether a PDAB itself can have a primary topic. In the example of Thriller (album), there is one album that is very well known and is considered much more highly notable than the others.

A request for comments concluded on 3 September 2019 that PDABs can have primary topics, but that "the standard for making disambiguated titles such as Foo (bar) a primary topic among all Foo's that are Bars should be tougher than the standard for titles that don't have any disambiguator". The Wikipedia guideline section known as WP:INCDAB or WP:INCOMPDAB was modified to reflect this." Tree Critter (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - pointless introduction of ambiguity for no benefit to readers, and a detriment to current and future editors who may mistakenly link to the wrong albums. Recent releases often have temporary spikes in pageviews, this doesn't mean we should set aside good sense. -- Netoholic @ 06:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. While the pageviews advantage is clear, I agree that applying WP:THRILLER here doesn't help clarity. See also WP:BROKE. 162 etc. (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Agreed with the above two points, especially the first. It is not useful to readers. ℛonherry☘ 17:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I was planning to comment in this RM but I was canvassed by the OP [1] so I will not be doing so. Others were also canvassed as well [2] [3] Calidum 20:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose and speedy close only Michael Jackson breaks the rules on Wikipedia. When Adele rises to demigod above the normal ranks of mankind only then will she be accorded this special privilege. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just realised that the nom rings a bell, it's the same one again cf. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alysson Antonio da Silva (fã da Adele)

No número total (worldwide) está errado, só com as vendas na Europa, Estados Unidos, Reino Unido e no Canadá o álbum já tem 31 milhões de cópias vendidas. Gostaria que vocês adm's atualizassem para os números certos. 168.194.64.138 (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]