Talk:300 strikeout club

Baseball High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-modern era 300-k pitchers

@Muboshgu, @BaseballFanatic1, @Yankees10, so I created this list since the 300 K club is quite exclusive in the modern era and thought deserved its own article. What I'm unsure about is to whether or not I should add pre-modern 300 k pitchers. I'm leaning yes but I'd like some opinions before I do - should it be a seperate list or should it be incorporated into this one? Also, should the season IP total of each pitcher be added to their row? Regards, Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know if this meets WP:LISTN. Is this the only source to suggest notability? The other citations are all to B-Ref player pages, which verify stats but say nothing of a "300 strikeout club". – Muboshgu (talk) 14:10, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot more: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] [7] [8] -- just a few of many I found on google search of "300 strikeouts." There are many others as well, including on MLB.com.

The page is still a work in progress, of course. I got the basics in. Would love to improve it in terms of references. Main thing, again, is the inclusion of pre-1900. I think it should be a seperate list from the modern one but, again, not fully sure. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]