Jump to content

Talk:329th Armament Systems Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article History prior to 29 May 2012

[edit]

The article was previously at 329th Fighter-Interceptor Group and was moved to an article under the unit's current designation on 29 May 2012. Article history prior to that date is at the 329th FIG. The assessments for WPMILHIST and WPAVIATION are those current for the 329th FIG article on that date--Lineagegeek (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

[edit]

G'day, have assessed as Milhist C-Class. The citations in the Lineage section are at best confusing, or at worst missing. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 10:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 329th Armament Systems Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]