This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from A. T. L. Covey-Crump appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
It's tid-bits not tit-bits. Get it right. God my life has no meaning.
In the UK, where the phrase originated, it’s tit-bits. This is a UK phrase for a UK subject so it is perfectly correct as tit-bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.189.141.36 (talk) 07:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sic that has been added is redundant. It is perfectly proper as it is, so no 'explanation' of the spelling is required using a 'sic'. I am guessing it was added as an American had queried the spelling. But as it is correct British English, and a quotation, it needs no explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.189.141.36 (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'Sic' is normally added when something in a quotation is misspelled or otherwise erroneous, to highlight the error and show that it hasn't resulted from the editing process. By adding sic you are suggesting that 'tit-bits' is erroneous, and it is not, it is perfectly correct. 86.189.141.36 (talk) 08:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may not know whether apparently random content is in fact essential, but I do not write random content. So please discuss on the talk page before removing content which is not a crime (e.g. not copyvio, offensiveness, or other illegal matter). Thank you for trying to help, but in this case we need the formal title of his father, because the father took himself seriously, and the son was writing a compendium of rather edgy Naval slang, which he was careful not to publish, even internally, until after his father's death. There is a tension here between decency and the correlation between the father's ancient language research and the content of the slang compendium, i.e. the likelihood that they were quietly collaborating. (A.T.L. Covey-Crump didn't study ancient languages; his father did). We cannot speak of those correlations without citation, but we can just give the father his full title, and other basic facts which are in no way joined by opinion/synthesis/conjunction, and no harm done. WP is supposed to be a potential first-stop for students and researchers, so it's worth giving them all the information that is available. WP rules require common sense. Storye book (talk) 13:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.svg)
