Talk:AIMStar

Launch date (for expansion)

It seems that the launch date is more likely somewhere around the year 2037. I hope I am corect. Fbs. 13 19:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Launch date isn't specified by the (single) linked reference. I've rewritten the article text to cite a reference and to give more detail where possible (numbers given must come from references, as explained in WP:V). --Christopher Thomas 02:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Launch date is indefinite - it is not yet possible,according to both source articles. An exciting proposal, and one that might be realized, but nowhere in the medium term. Ottawakismet (talk) 16:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is their any further information about AIMStar, or has it been combined into Project Orion ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.21.30.4 (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not combined into Project Orion, just a project on the drawing board, that might be revisited if antimatter production makes it a viable option. Ottawakismet (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Project Orion is gone, cancelled, it no longer exists and never will. We may yet get nuclear pulsed propulsion, but it will be a derivation/advancement of Orion.178.15.151.163 (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AIMStar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423202610/http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/introduction.html to http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/introduction.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AIMStar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306065325/http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/Papers/NASA_anti.pdf to http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/papers/nasa_anti.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fake table data

The linked paper contains a table with fake data (the DHe3 side being a near exact multiple of the DT side) compared to a bad scan from another source. This is also semi-confirmed by another NASA paper relating to the DHe3 side [1]. I suggest to include the correct table in the article. Mightyname (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]