Talk:African Standby Force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the African Standby Force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force

Africa Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sahrawi

I don't think it's helpful to say "The Sahrawi Republic had expressed its disposition to contribute to the African Standby Force", just like that. It gives the impression that the Sahrawi Republic is a fully-fledged country which is able to contribute regular forces to peacekeeping operations &c. I can understand how easy it is to assume that, since it's from a Sahrawi government source, but we shouldn't mislead readers. bobrayner (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the Sahrawi Republic is a full member of the AU (wich is the political body wich will control the African Standby Force), the sourced, reliable information that I added is helpful. "It gives the impression that the Sahrawi Republic is a fully-fledged country (recognized by +80 countries in the world, only Palestine and Kosovo had more recognitions, founding full member of the African Union -political body of the ASF-) which is able to contribute regular forces to peacekeeping operations (how do you know they are not able to do that? Are you a North African military expert, perhaps?)". More sources about the Sahrawi Republic involvement in the African Standby Force: SADR takes part at Sixth Meeting of African Chiefs of Defense Staff (Is participating at a Meeting of the African Chiefs of Defense Staff, wich discussed the activation the Rapid Deployment Capability of the African Standby Force, something misleading, not important or not helpful? I dont think so... And, how a country wich do not have intentions or capabilities of contributing to the ASF -thats what I understand you say- could be discussing issues concerning that force? Thats a clear non-sense). So please, stop trying to avoid the inclusion of sourced relevant content, unless you have real arguments...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with WP:NOTVANDAL? bobrayner (talk) 03:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on African Standby Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]